Top

Published in:

01-04-2022 | Laparotomy | Original Article

Prevention of incisional hernia with a reinforced tension line (RTL) versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies: 3-year follow-up in a randomized clinical trial

Authors: E. E. Lozada-Hernández, J. C. Mayagoitía-González, R. L. Smolinski-Kurek, L. Montiel-Hinojosa, L. Hernández-Villegas, J. M. Morales-Vargas, K. D. Pérez-Sánchez, A. Orozco-Mosqueda, M. Cano-Rosas

Published in: Hernia | Issue 2/2022

Abstract

Purpose

Incisional hernia (IH) has an incidence of 10–23%, which can increase to 38% in specific risk groups. The objective of this study is to report the results at 3 years of follow-up of the use of the reinforced tension line (RTL) technique compared with primary suture only (PSO) closure in the prevention of IH in high-risk patients undergoing laparotomy.

Methods

Open randomized controlled clinical trial. Included were patients older than 18 years who underwent midline laparotomy, emergency or scheduled, who were considered high risk, and who completed 3-year follow-up. The patients were randomized 1:1 to the RTL technique or to PSO. The objective was to report the incidence of IH and the complications associated with the closure method. Intention-to-treat analysis and Cox regression were performed.

Results

A total of 124 patients were randomized; 51 patients from the RTL group and 53 patients from the PSO group finished the 3-year follow-up. The incidence of IH was higher in the PSO group (15/53, 28.3%) than the RTL group (5/51, 9.8%) (p = 0.016, OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14–0.88, number needed to treat 5.4, log-rank test p = 0.017). The groups were similar in the rates of surgical site infection, hematoma, seroma, and postoperative pain during follow-up.

Conclusions

The RTL technique is useful in the prevention of IH when compared with PSO in high-risk midline laparotomy patients, and it is not associated with a higher percentage of complications.

Trial registration

Local Committee CI-HRAEB-2013-020. March 13, 2013.

Clinical trials

NCT02136628, retrospectively registered.

Available only for authorised users

Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW et al (2015) Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 386:1254–1260CrossRefPubMed

Jairam AP, Timmermans L, Eker HH, PRIMA Trialist group et al (2017) Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-years follow-up of a multicenter, double blind, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 390(10094):567–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31332-6CrossRefPubMed

Harris HW, Hope WH, Adrales G, Andersen DK, Deerenberg E et al (2018) Contemporary concepts in hernia prevention: selected proceedings from the 2017 international simposium of prevention of Incisional Hernia. Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.02.020CrossRefPubMed

Khorgami Z, Shoar S, Laghaie B, Aminian A, Araghi NH et al (2013) Prophylactic retention sutures in midline laparotomy in high-risk patients for wound dehiscence: a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res 180:238–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss2012.05.012CrossRefPubMed

Thorup T, Tolstrup MB, Gögenur I (2019) Reduced rate of incisional hernia after standardized fascial closure in emergency laparotomy. Hernia 23:341–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01893-0CrossRefPubMed

De Beaux AC (2019) Abdominall wall closure. BJS 106:163–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11081CrossRef

Ponce LF, Manso JEF, Abud VL, Nogueira W, Martinez R (2018) Sublay repair results in superior mesh incorporation and histological fibrogenesis in comparison to onlay and primary suture in a experimental rat model. Hernia 22:1089–1100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1808-yCrossRef

Payne R, Aldwinckle J, Ward S (2017) Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing the use of prophylactic mesh to standard midline closure in the reduction of incisional herniae. Hernia 21:843–853CrossRefPubMed

San Miguel C, Melero D, Jimenez E, Lopez P et al (2018) Long-term outcomes after prophylactic use of onlay mesh in midline laparotomy. Hernia 22:1113–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1833-xCrossRefPubMed

10.

Glauser PM, Brosi P, Speich B, Käser SA, Heigl A et al (2019) Prophylactic intraperitoneal onlay mesh following midline laparotomy-long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 43(7):1669–1675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-04964-6CrossRefPubMed

11.

Caro-Tarrago A, Olona C, Millan M, Olona M, Espina B, Jorba R (2019) Long-term results of a prospectiv randomized trial of midline laparotomy closure with onlay mesh. Hernia 23:335–340CrossRefPubMed

12.

Kohler A, Lavanchy JL, Lenoir U, Kurmann A, Candinas D, Beldi G (2019) Effectiveness of prophylactic intraperitoneal mesh implantation for prevention of incisional hernia in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 154(2):109–115CrossRefPubMed

13.

Lima HVG, Rasslan R, Novo FCF, Lima TMA, Damous SHB et al (2020) Prevention of fascial dehiscence with onlay prophylactic mesh in emergency laparotomy: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg 230:76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.09.010CrossRefPubMed

14.

Fischer JP, Harris HW, Lopez Cano M, Hope WW (2019) Hernia prevention: practice patterns and surgeons´attitudes about abdominal wall closure and the use of prophylactic mesh. Hernia 23:329–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01894-zCrossRefPubMed

15.

Warren J, Desai SS, Boswell ND, Hancock BH, Abbad H, Ewing JA, Carbonell AM, Cobb WS (2020) Safety and efficacy of synthetic mesh for ventral hernia repair in a contaminated field. J Am Coll Surg 230(4):405–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.008CrossRefPubMed

16.

Dumanian GA, Lanier ST, Souza JM, Young MW, Mlodinow AS et al (2018) Mesh sutured repairs of contamined incisional hernias. Am J Surg 216(2):267–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.10.025CrossRefPubMed

17.

Lozada-Hernández EE, Mayagoitia-Gonzalez JC, Smolinski-Kurek R, Alvarez-Canales JJ, Montiel-Hinojosa L et al (2016) Comparación de dos técnicas de sutura para cierre aponeurótico en laparotomía media en pacientes con alto riesgo de evisceración posquirúrgica. Rev Hispanoam Hernia 4(4):137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehah.2016.08.001CrossRef

18.

Van Ramshorst GH, Nieuwenhuizen J, Hop WC, Arends P, Boom J, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2010) Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model. World J Surg 34(1):20–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0277-yCrossRefPubMed

19.

Gómez Díaz CJ, Rebasa Cladera P, Navarro Soto S, Hidalgo Rosas JM, Luna Aufroy A, Montmany Vioque S, Corredera Cantarín C (2014) Validación de un modelo de riesgo de evisceración [Validation of abdominal wound dehiscence's risk model]. Cir Esp 92(2):114–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2012.12.008 (Spanish)CrossRefPubMed

20.

Hollinsky C, Sandberg S (2007) A biomechanical study of the reinforced tension line (RTL)–a technique for abdominal wall closure and incisional hernias. Eur Surg 39:122–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-006-0304-2CrossRef

21.

Hollinsky C, Sandberg S, Kocijan R (2007) Preliminary results with the reinforced tension line: a new technique for patients with ventral abdominal wall hernias. Am J Surg 194(2):234–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.09.045CrossRefPubMed

22.

Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, de Beaux AC, Deerenberg EB, East B, Fortelny RH, Gillion JF, Henriksen NA, Israelsson L, Jairam A, Jänes A, Jeekel J, López-Cano M, Miserez M, Morales-Conde S, Sanders DL, Simons MP, Śmietański M, Venclauskas L, Berrevoet F, European Hernia Society (2015) European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia 19(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1342-5CrossRefPubMed

23.

Webster C, Neumayer L, Smout R, Horn S, Daley J, Henderson W, Khuri S, National Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2003) Prognostic models of abdominal wound dehiscence after laparotomy. J Surg Res 109(2):130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4804(02)00097-5CrossRefPubMed

24.

Veljkovic R, Protic M, Gluhovic A, Potic Z, Milosevic Z, Stojadinovic A (2010) Prospective clinical trial of factors predicting the early development of incisional hernia after midline laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg. 210(2):210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.10.013CrossRefPubMed

25.

Goodenough CJ, Ko TC, Kao LS, Nguyen MT, Holihan JL, Alawadi Z, Nguyen DH, Flores JR, Arita NT, Roth JS, Liang MK (2015) Development and validation of a risk stratification score for ventral incisional hernia after abdominal surgery: hernia expectation rates in intra-abdominal surgery (the HERNIA Project). J Am Coll Surg 220(4):405–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.027CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Cherla DV, Moses ML, Mueck KM, Hannon C, Ko TC, Kao LS, Liang MK (2017) External validation of the HERNIAscore: an observational study. J Am Coll Surg 225(3):428–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.05.010CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Fischer JP, Basta MN, Mirzabeigi MN, Bauder AR, Fox JP, Drebin JA, Serletti JM, Kovach SJ (2016) A risk model and cost analysis of incisional hernia after elective, abdominal surgery based upon 12,373 cases: the case for targeted prophylactic intervention. Ann Surg 263(5):1010–1017. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001394CrossRefPubMed

28.

Basta MN, Kozak GM, Broach RB, Messa CA 4th, Rhemtulla I, DeMatteo RP, Serletti JM, Fischer JP (2019) Can we predict incisional hernia?: Development of a surgery-specific decision-support interface. Ann Surg 270(3):544–553. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003472CrossRefPubMed

29.

Lozada-Hernandez EE, Gonzalez-Gonzalez MA, Molina-Rodriguez JF, Obregon-Moreno E, Jimenez-Herevia AE, Cano Rosas M (2019) Comparison of two predictive scores for the development of incisional hernia. J Surg 6:188–193. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20190706.17CrossRef

30.

Hernández-Granados P, López-Cano M, Morales-Conde S, Muysoms F, García-Alamino J, Pereira-Rodríguez JA (2018) Incisional hernia prevention and use of mesh. A narrative review. Cir Esp 96(2):76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2018.01.003 (English, Spanish)CrossRefPubMed

31.

Yheulon C, Davis SS Jr (2019) Adopting the STITCH trial: crossing the chasm from publication to practice. JAMA Surg 154(12):1087–1088. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3358CrossRefPubMed

Title: Prevention of incisional hernia with a reinforced tension line (RTL) versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies: 3-year follow-up in a randomized clinical trial
Authors: E. E. Lozada-Hernández
J. C. Mayagoitía-González
R. L. Smolinski-Kurek
L. Montiel-Hinojosa
L. Hernández-Villegas
J. M. Morales-Vargas
K. D. Pérez-Sánchez
A. Orozco-Mosqueda
M. Cano-Rosas
Publication date: 01-04-2022
Publisher: Springer Paris
Keywords: Laparotomy
Laparotomy
Incisional Hernia
Published in: Hernia / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02338-9

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Prevention of incisional hernia with a reinforced tension line (RTL) versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies: 3-year follow-up in a randomized clinical trial

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Trial registration

Clinical trials

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Trial registration

Clinical trials

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

The use of a novel synthetic resorbable scaffold (TIGR Matrix®) in a clinical quality improvement (CQI) effort for abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR)

It’s time to re-acknowledge the differences: author’s reply

When to use a prophylactic mesh after stoma closure: author's reply

Comment to: Prophylactic retromuscular mesh placement for parastomal hernia prevention. Author’s reply

Inadequate awareness of adherence to ARRIVE guidelines, regarding reporting quality of hernia models repaired with meshes: a systematic review

Self-adhesive hydrogel meshes reduce tissue incorporation and mechanical behavior versus microgrips self-fixation: a preclinical study