Top

Hernia

Published in:

26-06-2021 | Laparotomy | Comment

Comment to: “Use of a bioabsorbable mesh in midline laparotomy closure to prevent incisional hernia: randomized controlled trial.”

Author: J. Li

Published in: Hernia | Issue 5/2022

Excerpt

Dear Editors: …

Valverde S, Arbós MA, Quiles MT, Espín E, Sánchez-Garcia JL, Rodrigues V, Pereira JA, Villalobos R, García-Alamino JM, Armengol M, López-Cano M (2021) Use of a bioabsorbable mesh in midline laparotomy closure to prevent incisional hernia: randomized controlled trial. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02435-3CrossRefPubMed

Jairam AP, Timmermans L, Eker HH, Pierik REGJM, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, Timman R, van der Ham AC, Dawson I, Charbon JA, Schuhmacher C, Mihaljevic A, Izbicki JR, Fikatas P, Knebel P, Fortelny RH, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF, Jeekel HJ, PRIMA Trialist Group (2017) Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 390(10094):567–576CrossRef

Reinforcement of Closure of Stoma Site (ROCSS) Collaborative and West Midlands Research Collaborative (2020) Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 395(10222):417–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32637-6CrossRef

Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW et al (2015) Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386(10000):1254–1260CrossRef

Köckerling F, Alam NN, Antoniou SA, Daniels IR, Famiglietti F, Fortelny RH, Heiss MM, Kallinowski F, Kyle-Leinhase I, Mayer F, Miserez M, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Muysoms F, Narang SK, Petter-Puchner A, Reinpold W, Scheuerlein H, Smietanski M, Stechemesser B, Strey C, Woeste G, Smart NJ (2018) What is the evidence for the use of biologic or biosynthetic meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction? Hernia 22(2):249–269CrossRef

Pizza F, D’Antonio D, Ronchi A, Lucido FS, Brusciano L, Marvaso A, Dell’Isola C, Gambardella C (2021) Prophylactic sublay non-absorbable mesh positioning following midline laparotomy in a clean-contaminated field: randomized clinical trial (PROMETHEUS). Br J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab068CrossRefPubMed

Title: Comment to: “Use of a bioabsorbable mesh in midline laparotomy closure to prevent incisional hernia: randomized controlled trial.”
Author: J. Li
Publication date: 26-06-2021
Publisher: Springer Paris
Keywords: Laparotomy
Laparotomy
Incisional Hernia
Published in: Hernia / Issue 5/2022
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02452-2

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Comment to: “Use of a bioabsorbable mesh in midline laparotomy closure to prevent incisional hernia: randomized controlled trial.”

Excerpt

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Excerpt

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 5/2022

The combination of the three modifications of the component separation technique in the management of complex subcostal abdominal wall hernia

The definition of elderly patients in surgical practice is old

Surgical technique in the laparoscopic repair of Morgagni hernia in adults. How do we do it?

Perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal resection (APR) with the laparoscopic-peritoneal dual fixation technique

National epidemiologic trends (2008–2018) in the United States for the incidence and expenditures associated with incisional hernia in relation to abdominal surgery

Comment to: Implementing a protocol to prevent incisional hernia in high-risk patients—a mesh is a powerful tool