Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 6/2021

01-12-2021 | Laparotomy | Original Article

Re-laparoscopy for the treatment of complications after laparoscopic appendectomy: is it possible to maintain the minimally invasive approach?

Authors: María A. Casas, Francisco Laxague, Francisco Schlottmann, Emmanuel Ezequiel Sadava

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Despite laparoscopy is considered an adequate tool for the diagnosis and management of postoperative surgical complications, its role after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether laparoscopy is useful for treating complications after laparoscopic appendectomy. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing LA, who needed a reoperation for postoperative complications during the period 2006–2020, was performed. Demographics, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. A total of 2019 LA were performed, and 41 patients (2%) underwent a RL for post appendectomy complications. Twenty-three patients (56%) were male. The mean age was 32 years old (16–92 years). The majority of patients (75%) had a complicated acute appendicitis in the first operation. The most common findings at RL were generalized peritonitis (36.4%) and intraabdominal abscesses (26.8%). Five patients (12.1%) developed stump appendicitis, all of them as a late complication. The procedures were completed laparoscopically in 85% and 6 patients (15%) required conversion to an open approach. Three patients (7.3%) required a percutaneous drainage and two patients (4.9%) needed an additional surgery (laparotomy) after RL, all of them presenting with generalized peritonitis at the RL. No mortality was registered. Re-laparoscopy is feasible, safe, and highly effective for the diagnosis and treatment of post appendectomy complications. RL should be encouraged to avoid more aggressive procedures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bhangu A, Søreide K, Saverio Di et al (2015) Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 386(10000):1278–1287CrossRef Bhangu A, Søreide K, Saverio Di et al (2015) Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 386(10000):1278–1287CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS et al (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132(5):910–925CrossRef Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS et al (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132(5):910–925CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jaschinski T, Mosch CG, Eikermann M et al (2018) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11(11):CD001546PubMed Jaschinski T, Mosch CG, Eikermann M et al (2018) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11(11):CD001546PubMed
4.
go back to reference Erenoglu C, Akin ML, Kayaoglu H et al (2001) Is helium insufflation superior to carbon dioxide insufflation in bacteremia and bacterial translocation with peritonitis? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 11(2):69–72CrossRef Erenoglu C, Akin ML, Kayaoglu H et al (2001) Is helium insufflation superior to carbon dioxide insufflation in bacteremia and bacterial translocation with peritonitis? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 11(2):69–72CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Horattas MC, Haller N, Ricchiutti D et al (2003) Increased transperitoneal bacterial translocation in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 17:1464–1467CrossRef Horattas MC, Haller N, Ricchiutti D et al (2003) Increased transperitoneal bacterial translocation in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 17:1464–1467CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Arnell TD (2006) Minimally invasive reoperation following laparotomy. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 19:223–227CrossRef Arnell TD (2006) Minimally invasive reoperation following laparotomy. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 19:223–227CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rosin D, Zmora O, Khaikin M et al (2004) Laparoscopic management of surgical complications after a recent laparotomy. Surg Endosc 18:994–996CrossRef Rosin D, Zmora O, Khaikin M et al (2004) Laparoscopic management of surgical complications after a recent laparotomy. Surg Endosc 18:994–996CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kirshtein B, Domchik S, Mizrahi S et al (2009) Laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment of postoperative complications. Am J Surg 197:19–23CrossRef Kirshtein B, Domchik S, Mizrahi S et al (2009) Laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment of postoperative complications. Am J Surg 197:19–23CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebaur E et al (2002) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1121–1143CrossRef Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebaur E et al (2002) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1121–1143CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Clara L et al (2018) Infecciones intraabdominales: puesta al día y recomendaciones de la sociedad argentina de infectología. Medicina (Buenos Aires) 78:417–426 Clara L et al (2018) Infecciones intraabdominales: puesta al día y recomendaciones de la sociedad argentina de infectología. Medicina (Buenos Aires) 78:417–426
12.
go back to reference Gorter RR, Eker HH, Gorter-Stam MAW et al (2016) Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015. Surg Endos 30:4668–4690CrossRef Gorter RR, Eker HH, Gorter-Stam MAW et al (2016) Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015. Surg Endos 30:4668–4690CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kirshtein B, Roy-Shapira A, Domchik S et al (2008) Early relaparoscopy for management of suspected postoperative complications. J Gastrointest Surg 12(7):1257–1262CrossRef Kirshtein B, Roy-Shapira A, Domchik S et al (2008) Early relaparoscopy for management of suspected postoperative complications. J Gastrointest Surg 12(7):1257–1262CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wind J, Koopman AG, van Berge Henegouwen MI et al (2007) Laparoscopic reintervention for anastomotic leakage after primary laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 94:1562–1566CrossRef Wind J, Koopman AG, van Berge Henegouwen MI et al (2007) Laparoscopic reintervention for anastomotic leakage after primary laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 94:1562–1566CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Vennix S, Abegg R, Bakker OJ et al (2013) Surgical re- interventions following colorectal surgery: open versus laparoscopic management of anastomotic leakage. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:739–744CrossRef Vennix S, Abegg R, Bakker OJ et al (2013) Surgical re- interventions following colorectal surgery: open versus laparoscopic management of anastomotic leakage. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:739–744CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dexter SP, Miller GV, Davides D et al (2000) Relaparoscopy for the detection and treatment of complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 179(4):316–319CrossRef Dexter SP, Miller GV, Davides D et al (2000) Relaparoscopy for the detection and treatment of complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 179(4):316–319CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chang KH, Bourke MG, Kavanagh DO et al (2016) A systematic review of the role of re-laparoscopy in the management of complications following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surgeon 14(5):287–293CrossRef Chang KH, Bourke MG, Kavanagh DO et al (2016) A systematic review of the role of re-laparoscopy in the management of complications following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surgeon 14(5):287–293CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lee CM, Huh JW, Yun SH et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus open reintervention for anastomotic leakage following minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 29(4):931–936CrossRef Lee CM, Huh JW, Yun SH et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus open reintervention for anastomotic leakage following minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 29(4):931–936CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Aziz DAA, Said S, Osman M et al (2017) The role of delayed laparoscopic suction for intra-abdominal collection or abscess post appendectomy in paediatric patients: case series and review of literature. Mini-invasive Surg 1:143–147 Aziz DAA, Said S, Osman M et al (2017) The role of delayed laparoscopic suction for intra-abdominal collection or abscess post appendectomy in paediatric patients: case series and review of literature. Mini-invasive Surg 1:143–147
20.
go back to reference Abularrage CJ, Bloom S, Bruno DA (2008) Laparoscopic drainage of postappendectomy-retained fecalith and intra-abdominal abscess in the pediatric population. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(4):644–650CrossRef Abularrage CJ, Bloom S, Bruno DA (2008) Laparoscopic drainage of postappendectomy-retained fecalith and intra-abdominal abscess in the pediatric population. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(4):644–650CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Clark JJ, Johnson SM (2011) Laparoscopic drainage of intraabdominal abscess after appendectomy: an alternative to laparotomy in cases not amenable to percutaneous drainage. J Pediatr Surg 46(7):1385–1389CrossRef Clark JJ, Johnson SM (2011) Laparoscopic drainage of intraabdominal abscess after appendectomy: an alternative to laparotomy in cases not amenable to percutaneous drainage. J Pediatr Surg 46(7):1385–1389CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kassahun WT, Mehdorn M, Wagner TC (2019) The effects of reoperation on surgical outcomes following surgery for major abdominal emergencies. A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 72:235–240CrossRef Kassahun WT, Mehdorn M, Wagner TC (2019) The effects of reoperation on surgical outcomes following surgery for major abdominal emergencies. A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 72:235–240CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Allaway MGR, Clement K, Eslick GD et al (2019) Early laparoscopic washout may resolve persistent intra-abdominal infection post-appendicectomy. World J Surg 43(4):998–1006CrossRef Allaway MGR, Clement K, Eslick GD et al (2019) Early laparoscopic washout may resolve persistent intra-abdominal infection post-appendicectomy. World J Surg 43(4):998–1006CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Perez KS, Allen SR (2018) Complicated appendicitis and considerations for interval appendectomy. JAAPA 31(9):35–41CrossRef Perez KS, Allen SR (2018) Complicated appendicitis and considerations for interval appendectomy. JAAPA 31(9):35–41CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Emil S, Elkady S, Shbat L et al (2014) Determinants of postoperative abscess occurrence and percutaneous drainage in children with perforated appendicitis. Pediatr Surg Int 30:1265–1271CrossRef Emil S, Elkady S, Shbat L et al (2014) Determinants of postoperative abscess occurrence and percutaneous drainage in children with perforated appendicitis. Pediatr Surg Int 30:1265–1271CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Isaksson K, Montgomery A, Moberg AC et al (2014) Long-term follow-up for adhesive small bowel obstruction after open versus laparoscopic surgery for suspected appendicitis. Ann Surg 259:1173–1177CrossRef Isaksson K, Montgomery A, Moberg AC et al (2014) Long-term follow-up for adhesive small bowel obstruction after open versus laparoscopic surgery for suspected appendicitis. Ann Surg 259:1173–1177CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Schlottmann F, Sadava EE, Peña ME et al (2017) Laparoscopic appendectomy: risk factors for postoperative intraabdominal abscess. World J Surg 41(5):1254–1258CrossRef Schlottmann F, Sadava EE, Peña ME et al (2017) Laparoscopic appendectomy: risk factors for postoperative intraabdominal abscess. World J Surg 41(5):1254–1258CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Reid RI, Dobbs BR, Frizelle FA (1999) Risk factors for postappendicectomy intra-abdominal abscess. Aust N Z J Surg 69:373–374CrossRef Reid RI, Dobbs BR, Frizelle FA (1999) Risk factors for postappendicectomy intra-abdominal abscess. Aust N Z J Surg 69:373–374CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Subramanian A, Liang MK (2012) A 60-year literature review of stump appendicitis: the need for a critical view. Am J Surg 203(4):503–507CrossRef Subramanian A, Liang MK (2012) A 60-year literature review of stump appendicitis: the need for a critical view. Am J Surg 203(4):503–507CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Greenberg JJ, Thomas TJ (1996) Appendicitis after laparoscopic appendectomy. A warning. J Laparoendosc Surg 6:185–187CrossRef Greenberg JJ, Thomas TJ (1996) Appendicitis after laparoscopic appendectomy. A warning. J Laparoendosc Surg 6:185–187CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Uludag M, Isgor A, Basak M (2006) Stump appendicitis is a rare delayed complication of appendectomy. A case report. World J Gastroenterol 12:5401–5403CrossRef Uludag M, Isgor A, Basak M (2006) Stump appendicitis is a rare delayed complication of appendectomy. A case report. World J Gastroenterol 12:5401–5403CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Mangi AA, Berger DL (2000) Stump appendicitis. Am Surg 66:739–741PubMed Mangi AA, Berger DL (2000) Stump appendicitis. Am Surg 66:739–741PubMed
33.
go back to reference Ismail I, Iusco D, Jannaci M et al (2009) Prompt recognition of stump appendicitis is important to avoid serious complications. A case report. Cases J 2:7415CrossRef Ismail I, Iusco D, Jannaci M et al (2009) Prompt recognition of stump appendicitis is important to avoid serious complications. A case report. Cases J 2:7415CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Liang MK, Lo HG, Marks JL (2006) Stump appendicitis. A comprehensive review of literature. Am Surg 72:162–166CrossRef Liang MK, Lo HG, Marks JL (2006) Stump appendicitis. A comprehensive review of literature. Am Surg 72:162–166CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Geraci G, Lena A, D’Orazio B et al (2019) A rare clinical entity: stump appendicitis. Case report and complete review of literature. Clin Ter 170(6):e409–e417PubMed Geraci G, Lena A, D’Orazio B et al (2019) A rare clinical entity: stump appendicitis. Case report and complete review of literature. Clin Ter 170(6):e409–e417PubMed
Metadata
Title
Re-laparoscopy for the treatment of complications after laparoscopic appendectomy: is it possible to maintain the minimally invasive approach?
Authors
María A. Casas
Francisco Laxague
Francisco Schlottmann
Emmanuel Ezequiel Sadava
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00917-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

Updates in Surgery 6/2021 Go to the issue