Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Laparotomy in women with severe acute maternal morbidity: secondary analysis of a nationwide cohort study

Authors: Tom Witteveen, Athanasios Kallianidis, Joost J. Zwart, Kitty W. Bloemenkamp, Jos van Roosmalen, Thomas van den Akker

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although pregnancy-related laparotomy is a major intervention, literature is limited to small case-control or single center studies. We aimed to identify national incidence rates for postpartum laparotomy related to severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM) in a high-income country and test the hypothesis that risk of postpartum laparotomy differs by mode of birth.

Methods

In a population-based cohort study in all 98 hospitals with a maternity unit in the Netherlands, pregnant women with SAMM according to specified disease and management criteria were included from 01/08/2004 to 01/08/2006. We calculated the incidence of postpartum laparotomy after vaginal and cesarean births. Laparotomies were analyzed in relation to mode of birth using all births in the country as reference. Relative risks (RR) were calculated for laparotomy following emergency and planned cesarean section compared to vaginal birth, excluding laparotomies following births before 24 weeks’ gestation and hysterectomies performed during cesarean section.

Results

The incidence of postpartum laparotomy in women with SAMM in the Netherlands was 6.0 per 10,000 births. Incidence was 30.1 and 1.8 per 10,000 following cesarean and vaginal birth respectively. Compared to vaginal birth, RR of laparotomy after cesarean birth was 16.7 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 12.2-22.6). RR was 21.8 (95% CI 15.8-30.2) for emergency and 10.5 (95% CI 7.1-15.6) for planned cesarean section.

Conclusions

Risk of laparotomy, although small, was considerably elevated in women who gave birth by cesarean section. This should be considered in counseling and clinical decision making.
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research. Evaluating the quality of care for severe pregnancy complications. In: The WHO near-miss approach for maternal health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research. Evaluating the quality of care for severe pregnancy complications. In: The WHO near-miss approach for maternal health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
2.
go back to reference Ashwal E, Yogev Y, Melamed N, Khadega R, Ben-Haroush A, Wiznitzer A, Peled Y. Characterizing the need for re-laparotomy during puerperium after cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290(1):35–9.CrossRefPubMed Ashwal E, Yogev Y, Melamed N, Khadega R, Ben-Haroush A, Wiznitzer A, Peled Y. Characterizing the need for re-laparotomy during puerperium after cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290(1):35–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Gedikbasi A, Akyol A, Asar E, Bingol B, Uncu R, Sargin A, Ceylan Y. Re-laparotomy after cesarean section: operative complications in surgical birth. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278(5):419–25.CrossRefPubMed Gedikbasi A, Akyol A, Asar E, Bingol B, Uncu R, Sargin A, Ceylan Y. Re-laparotomy after cesarean section: operative complications in surgical birth. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278(5):419–25.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kessous R, Danor D, Weintraub YA, Wiznitzer A, Sergienko R, Ohel I, Sheiner E. Risk factors for relaparotomy after cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(11):2167–70.CrossRefPubMed Kessous R, Danor D, Weintraub YA, Wiznitzer A, Sergienko R, Ohel I, Sheiner E. Risk factors for relaparotomy after cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(11):2167–70.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Levin I, Rapaport AS, Salzer L, Maslovitz S, Lessing JB, Almog B. Risk factors for relaparotomy after cesarean birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;119(2):163–5.CrossRefPubMed Levin I, Rapaport AS, Salzer L, Maslovitz S, Lessing JB, Almog B. Risk factors for relaparotomy after cesarean birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;119(2):163–5.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lurie S, Sadan O, Golan A. Re-laparotomy after cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;134(2):184–7.CrossRefPubMed Lurie S, Sadan O, Golan A. Re-laparotomy after cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;134(2):184–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ragab A, Mousbah Y, Barakat R, Zayed A, Badawy A. Re-laparotomy after cesarean births: risk factors and how to avoid? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;24:1–3. Ragab A, Mousbah Y, Barakat R, Zayed A, Badawy A. Re-laparotomy after cesarean births: risk factors and how to avoid? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;24:1–3.
8.
go back to reference Seal SL, Kamilya G, Bhattacharyya SK, Mukherji J, Bhattacharyya AR. Relaparotomy after cesarean birth: experience from an Indian teaching hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007;33(6):804–9.CrossRefPubMed Seal SL, Kamilya G, Bhattacharyya SK, Mukherji J, Bhattacharyya AR. Relaparotomy after cesarean birth: experience from an Indian teaching hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007;33(6):804–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Shinar S, Hareuveni M, Ben-Tal O, Many A. Relaparotomies after cesarean sections: risk factors, indications, and management. J Perinat Med. 2013;41(5):567–72.CrossRefPubMed Shinar S, Hareuveni M, Ben-Tal O, Many A. Relaparotomies after cesarean sections: risk factors, indications, and management. J Perinat Med. 2013;41(5):567–72.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Levitt L, Sapir H, Kabiri D, Ein-Mor E, Hochner-Celnikier D, Amsalem H. Re-laparotomy following cesarean birth - risk factors and outcomes. J Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;24:1–3. Levitt L, Sapir H, Kabiri D, Ein-Mor E, Hochner-Celnikier D, Amsalem H. Re-laparotomy following cesarean birth - risk factors and outcomes. J Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;24:1–3.
13.
go back to reference van Dillen J, Zwart JJ, Schutte J, Bloemenkamp KW, van Roosmalen J. Severe acute maternal morbidity and mode of birth in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(11):1460–5.CrossRefPubMed van Dillen J, Zwart JJ, Schutte J, Bloemenkamp KW, van Roosmalen J. Severe acute maternal morbidity and mode of birth in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(11):1460–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Ory F, de Vries JI, Bloemenkamp KW, van Roosmalen J. Severe maternal morbidity during pregnancy, birth and puerperium in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based study of 371,000 pregnancies. BJOG. 2008;115(7):842–50.CrossRefPubMed Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Ory F, de Vries JI, Bloemenkamp KW, van Roosmalen J. Severe maternal morbidity during pregnancy, birth and puerperium in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based study of 371,000 pregnancies. BJOG. 2008;115(7):842–50.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hendriks J, Zwart JJ, Briët E, Brand A, van Roosmalen J. The clinical benefit of blood transfusion: a hypothetical experiment based on a nationwide survey of severe maternal morbidity. Vox Sang. 2013;104(3):234–9.CrossRefPubMed Hendriks J, Zwart JJ, Briët E, Brand A, van Roosmalen J. The clinical benefit of blood transfusion: a hypothetical experiment based on a nationwide survey of severe maternal morbidity. Vox Sang. 2013;104(3):234–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Vogel JP, Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Tunçalp Ö, Mori R, Morisaki N, Ortiz-Panozo E, Hernandez B, Pérez-Cuevas R, Qureshi Z, Gülmezoglu AM. Temmerman M; WHO multi-country survey on maternal and newborn Health Research network. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(5):e260–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70094-X. Epub 2015 Apr 9CrossRefPubMed Vogel JP, Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Tunçalp Ö, Mori R, Morisaki N, Ortiz-Panozo E, Hernandez B, Pérez-Cuevas R, Qureshi Z, Gülmezoglu AM. Temmerman M; WHO multi-country survey on maternal and newborn Health Research network. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(5):e260–70. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S2214-109X(15)70094-X. Epub 2015 Apr 9CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ramires de Jesus G, Ramires de Jesus N, Peixoto-Filho F, Lobato G. Cesarean rates in Brazil: what is involved? BJOG. 2015;122(5):606–9.CrossRefPubMed Ramires de Jesus G, Ramires de Jesus N, Peixoto-Filho F, Lobato G. Cesarean rates in Brazil: what is involved? BJOG. 2015;122(5):606–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland. Perinatale Registratie Nederland Grote Lijnen 1999 - 2012 [The Netherlands Perinatal Registry Trends 1999-2012]. Utrecht: Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland; 2011:26-27. Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland. Perinatale Registratie Nederland Grote Lijnen 1999 - 2012 [The Netherlands Perinatal Registry Trends 1999-2012]. Utrecht: Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland; 2011:26-27.
19.
go back to reference Deng W, Klemetti R, Long Q, Wu Z, Duan C, Zhang WH, Ronsmans C, Zhang Y, Hemminki E. Cesarean section in shanghai: women's or healthcare provider's preferences? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:285.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Deng W, Klemetti R, Long Q, Wu Z, Duan C, Zhang WH, Ronsmans C, Zhang Y, Hemminki E. Cesarean section in shanghai: women's or healthcare provider's preferences? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:285.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Schuitemaker N, van Roosmalen J, Dekker G, van Dongen P, van Geijn H, Gravenhorst JB. Maternal mortality after cesarean section in The Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76:332–4.CrossRefPubMed Schuitemaker N, van Roosmalen J, Dekker G, van Dongen P, van Geijn H, Gravenhorst JB. Maternal mortality after cesarean section in The Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76:332–4.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Nederlandse Vereniging voor Obstetrie & Gynecologie. Zwangerschap en bevalling na een voorgaande sectio cesarea [Pregnancy and birth after previous cesarean section]. [http://www.nvog-documenten.nl/]. Accesed 30 Jul 2016. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Obstetrie & Gynecologie. Zwangerschap en bevalling na een voorgaande sectio cesarea [Pregnancy and birth after previous cesarean section]. [http://​www.​nvog-documenten.​nl/]. Accesed 30 Jul 2016.
22.
go back to reference van Ham MA, van Dongen PW, Mulder J. Maternal consequences of cesarean section. A retrospective study of intra-operative and postoperative maternal complications of cesarean section during a 10-year period. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997;74:1–6.CrossRefPubMed van Ham MA, van Dongen PW, Mulder J. Maternal consequences of cesarean section. A retrospective study of intra-operative and postoperative maternal complications of cesarean section during a 10-year period. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997;74:1–6.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Zelop C, Heffner LJ. The downside of cesarean birth: short- and long-term complications. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2004;47:386–93.CrossRefPubMed Zelop C, Heffner LJ. The downside of cesarean birth: short- and long-term complications. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2004;47:386–93.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Ye J, Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, Torloni MR, Gulmezoglu AM, Betran AP. Association between rates of cesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG. 2015;123:745–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ye J, Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, Torloni MR, Gulmezoglu AM, Betran AP. Association between rates of cesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG. 2015;123:745–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Laparotomy in women with severe acute maternal morbidity: secondary analysis of a nationwide cohort study
Authors
Tom Witteveen
Athanasios Kallianidis
Joost J. Zwart
Kitty W. Bloemenkamp
Jos van Roosmalen
Thomas van den Akker
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1688-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018 Go to the issue