Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2023

01-12-2023 | Laparoscopy | RESEARCH

A comparative study between transanal and transabdominal approaches in treatment of complete rectal prolapse

Authors: Han Deok Kwak, Jun Seong Chung, Jae Kyun Ju

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Mini abstract

Formulating clear guidelines for the most reliable treatment methods for complete rectal prolapse appears challenging. The authors designed this study to compare the results according to the approaches for female complete rectal prolapse and to suggest a more effective method. The transanal and abdominal groups showed differences in operating time, hospital stay, and recurrence rate. However, both groups demonstrated improvement in postoperative functional evaluation.

Purpose

There is a wide variety of surgical methods to treat rectal prolapse; however, to date, no clear agreement exists regarding the most effective surgical method. This study was designed to compare the results according to the surgical approach for complete rectal prolapse in women.

Methods

This study was conducted from March 2016 to February 2021 on female patients with rectal prolapse who underwent surgery. First, all patients were classified into mucosal and complete layer groups to confirm the difference in results between the two groups, and only complete layer prolapse patients were divided into transanal and abdominal approaches to compare parameters and functional outcomes in each group.

Results

A total of 180 patients were included, with an average age of 71.7 years and 102 complete prolapses. The complete layer group was found to have more abdominal access, longer operating time, and higher recurrence rates compared to the mucosal layer group. (p<0.001) When targeting only the complete layer patients, there were 65 patients with the transanal and 37 with the abdominal (laparoscopic) approaches. The abdominal approach group had a longer operating time and hospital stay (p<0.001, respectively) and lower recurrence rate than the transanal group (transanal vs. abdominal, 38% vs. 10.8%, p=0.003), while the Wexner constipation and incontinence scores showed improved results in both groups.

Conclusion

Although operating time and hospitalization period were shorter in the transanal group, laparoscopic abdominal surgery is a procedure that can reduce the recurrent rate for complete rectal prolapse.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ashrafian H (2014) Arius of Alexandria (256–336 ad): the first reported mortality from rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:539CrossRefPubMed Ashrafian H (2014) Arius of Alexandria (256–336 ad): the first reported mortality from rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:539CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cunin D, Siproudhis L, Desfourneaux V, Berkelmans I, Meunier B, Bretagne J-F, Bouguen G (2013) No surgery for full-thickness rectal prolapse: what happens with continence? World J Surg 37:1297–1302CrossRefPubMed Cunin D, Siproudhis L, Desfourneaux V, Berkelmans I, Meunier B, Bretagne J-F, Bouguen G (2013) No surgery for full-thickness rectal prolapse: what happens with continence? World J Surg 37:1297–1302CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA, Robers RA (2002) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 89:35–39CrossRefPubMed Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA, Robers RA (2002) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 89:35–39CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rothenhoefer S, Herrle F, Herold A, Joos A, Bussen D, Kieser M, Schiller P, Klose C, Seiler CM, Kienle P, Post S (2012) DeloRes trial: study protocol for a randomized trial comparing two standardized surgical approaches in rectal prolapse-Delorme’s procedure versus resection rectopexy. Trials 13:1–10CrossRef Rothenhoefer S, Herrle F, Herold A, Joos A, Bussen D, Kieser M, Schiller P, Klose C, Seiler CM, Kienle P, Post S (2012) DeloRes trial: study protocol for a randomized trial comparing two standardized surgical approaches in rectal prolapse-Delorme’s procedure versus resection rectopexy. Trials 13:1–10CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Senapati A, Gray RG, Middleton LJ, Harding J, Hills RK, Armitage NCM, Buckley L, Northover JMA (2013) PROSPER: a randomised comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 15:858–868CrossRefPubMed Senapati A, Gray RG, Middleton LJ, Harding J, Hills RK, Armitage NCM, Buckley L, Northover JMA (2013) PROSPER: a randomised comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 15:858–868CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW, Merrie AEH, Plank LD, Bissett IP (2010) Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Di 12:504–512CrossRef Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW, Merrie AEH, Plank LD, Bissett IP (2010) Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Di 12:504–512CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hotouras A, Ribas Y, Zakeri S, Bhan C, Wexner SD, Chan CL, Murphy J (2015) A systematic review of the literature on the surgical management of recurrent rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 17:657–664CrossRefPubMed Hotouras A, Ribas Y, Zakeri S, Bhan C, Wexner SD, Chan CL, Murphy J (2015) A systematic review of the literature on the surgical management of recurrent rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 17:657–664CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tou S, Brown SR, Nelson RL (2015) Surgery for complete (full‐thickness) rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11 Tou S, Brown SR, Nelson RL (2015) Surgery for complete (full‐thickness) rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11
9.
go back to reference Bordeianou L, Paquette I, Johnson E, Holubar SD, Gaertner W, Feingold DL, Steele SR (2017) Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 60:1121–1131CrossRefPubMed Bordeianou L, Paquette I, Johnson E, Holubar SD, Gaertner W, Feingold DL, Steele SR (2017) Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 60:1121–1131CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Van der Schans EM, Paulides TJC, Wijffels NA, Consten ECJ (2018) Management of patients with rectal prolapse: the 2017 Dutch guidelines. Tech Coloproctol 22:589–596CrossRefPubMed Van der Schans EM, Paulides TJC, Wijffels NA, Consten ECJ (2018) Management of patients with rectal prolapse: the 2017 Dutch guidelines. Tech Coloproctol 22:589–596CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Emile SH, Elbanna H, Youssef M, Thabet W, Omar W, Elshobaky A, Abd El-Hamed TM, Farid M (2017) Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs Delorme’s operation in management of complete rectal prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Colorectal Dis 19:50–57CrossRefPubMed Emile SH, Elbanna H, Youssef M, Thabet W, Omar W, Elshobaky A, Abd El-Hamed TM, Farid M (2017) Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs Delorme’s operation in management of complete rectal prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Colorectal Dis 19:50–57CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Salkeld G, Bagia M, Solomon M (2004) Economic impact of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg 91:1188–1191CrossRefPubMed Salkeld G, Bagia M, Solomon M (2004) Economic impact of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg 91:1188–1191CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kellokumpu I, Vironen J, Scheinin T (2000) Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse. Surg Endosc 14:634–640CrossRefPubMed Kellokumpu I, Vironen J, Scheinin T (2000) Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse. Surg Endosc 14:634–640CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Jonkers HF, Maya A, Draaisma WA, Bemelman WA, Broeders IA, Consten ECJ, Wexner SD (2014) Laparoscopic resection rectopexy versus laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 18:641–646CrossRef Jonkers HF, Maya A, Draaisma WA, Bemelman WA, Broeders IA, Consten ECJ, Wexner SD (2014) Laparoscopic resection rectopexy versus laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 18:641–646CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bjerke T, Mynster T (2018) One decade of rectal prolapse surgery: a national study. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:299–304CrossRefPubMed Bjerke T, Mynster T (2018) One decade of rectal prolapse surgery: a national study. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:299–304CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rogers AC, McCawley N, Hanly AM, Deasy J, McNamara DA, Burke JP (2018) Trends in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a population analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:459–465CrossRefPubMed Rogers AC, McCawley N, Hanly AM, Deasy J, McNamara DA, Burke JP (2018) Trends in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a population analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:459–465CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Dixon A, Greenslade G, Lindsey I (2011) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse is safe and effective in the elderly. Does this make perineal procedures obsolete? Colorectal Dis 13:561–566CrossRefPubMed Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Dixon A, Greenslade G, Lindsey I (2011) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse is safe and effective in the elderly. Does this make perineal procedures obsolete? Colorectal Dis 13:561–566CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Laubert T, Bader FG, Kleemann M, Esnaashari H, Bouchard R, Hildebrand P, Schlöricke E, Bruch H-P, Roblick UJ (2012) Outcome analysis of elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:789–795CrossRefPubMed Laubert T, Bader FG, Kleemann M, Esnaashari H, Bouchard R, Hildebrand P, Schlöricke E, Bruch H-P, Roblick UJ (2012) Outcome analysis of elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:789–795CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A comparative study between transanal and transabdominal approaches in treatment of complete rectal prolapse
Authors
Han Deok Kwak
Jun Seong Chung
Jae Kyun Ju
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-023-04371-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2023 Go to the issue