Skip to main content
Top

28-11-2023 | Laparoscopy | Original Article

Comparative Study of the Short-Term Outcomes and Long-Term Outcomes using Total 3D and 2D Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy with Delta-Shaped Anastomosis for Gastric Cancer

Authors: Zhenxing Zhang, Zhongda Luan, Shan Wang, Minfeng Ye, Kewei Ji, Yu Zhang, Honghai Li, Yaoqing Li, Feng Tao, Kelong Tao, Guangen Xu

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery

Login to get access

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy has advantages over two-dimensional (2D) in gastric cancer (GC) surgery, but there is still no comparative study of 3D versus 2D for delta-shaped anastomosis (DA). The objective of this study was to investigate the short-term and long-term efficacy and safety of 3D laparoscopy in distal gastrectomy with DA. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 134 patients treated with 3D (n = 70) and 2D (n = 64) laparoscopic D2 lymphadenectomy for distal GC at the Shaoxing People’s Hospital from 07/2016 to 03/2022. The effects on baseline, pathology, perioperative data (operative time, anastomosis time, operation blood loss, diameter, splenic injury, number of lymph nodes, time to first flatus, time to liquid diet, postoperative hospital days, and inpatient costs), complications, and 5-year follow-up were analyzed. The difference between the baseline (general information and postoperative pathology) of the two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The 3D group was associated with a shorter anastomosis time (15.76 min vs 17.89 min, P < 0.0001) but a similar operative time (175.70 vs 182.80 min, P = 0.1664). Shorter time to liquid diet (2.09 vs 2.47 days, P < 0.0001) and postoperative hospital days (7.56 vs 8.75 days, P < 0.0001) of 3D group were observed. The complications, 5-year follow-up overall survival and disease-free survival rates between the groups were not statistically significant. 3D laparoscopy is safe and effective with a faster procedure and recovery time.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K (1994) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4(2):146–148PubMed Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K (1994) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4(2):146–148PubMed
2.
go back to reference Nicolau S, Soler L, Mutter D et al (2011) Augmented reality in laparoscopic surgical oncology. Surg Oncol 20:189–201CrossRefPubMed Nicolau S, Soler L, Mutter D et al (2011) Augmented reality in laparoscopic surgical oncology. Surg Oncol 20:189–201CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Chan AC, Chung SC, Yim AP, Lau JY, Ng EK, Li AK (1997) Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11:438–440CrossRefPubMed Chan AC, Chung SC, Yim AP, Lau JY, Ng EK, Li AK (1997) Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11:438–440CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sinha R, Sundaram M, Raje S et al (2013) 3D laparoscopy: technique and initial experience in 451 cases. Gynecol Surg 10:123–128CrossRef Sinha R, Sundaram M, Raje S et al (2013) 3D laparoscopy: technique and initial experience in 451 cases. Gynecol Surg 10:123–128CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chiu CJ, Lobo Prabhu K, Tan-Tam CC et al (2015) Using threedimensional laparoscopy as a novel training tool for novice trainees compared with two-dimensional laparoscopy. Am J Surg 209(5):824–827CrossRefPubMed Chiu CJ, Lobo Prabhu K, Tan-Tam CC et al (2015) Using threedimensional laparoscopy as a novel training tool for novice trainees compared with two-dimensional laparoscopy. Am J Surg 209(5):824–827CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Agrusa A, di Buono G, Chianetta D et al (2016) Three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a case-control study. Int J Surg 28(Suppl 1):S114–S117CrossRefPubMed Agrusa A, di Buono G, Chianetta D et al (2016) Three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a case-control study. Int J Surg 28(Suppl 1):S114–S117CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Aykan S, Singhal P, Nguyen DP et al (2014) Perioperative, pathologic, and early continence outcomes comparing three-dimensional and two-dimensional display systems for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy–a retrospective, single-surgeon study. J Endourol 28(5):539–543CrossRefPubMed Aykan S, Singhal P, Nguyen DP et al (2014) Perioperative, pathologic, and early continence outcomes comparing three-dimensional and two-dimensional display systems for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy–a retrospective, single-surgeon study. J Endourol 28(5):539–543CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadière GB et al (2007) Comparison of learning curves and skill transfer between classical and robotic laparoscopy according to the viewing conditions: implications for training. Am J Surg 194:115–121CrossRefPubMed Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadière GB et al (2007) Comparison of learning curves and skill transfer between classical and robotic laparoscopy according to the viewing conditions: implications for training. Am J Surg 194:115–121CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Association JGC (2017) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, 15th edn. Kanehara Publisher, Tokyo Association JGC (2017) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, 15th edn. Kanehara Publisher, Tokyo
12.
go back to reference Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F et al (2016) AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th edn. Springer, New York Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F et al (2016) AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th edn. Springer, New York
14.
go back to reference Fock KM (2014) Review article: the epidemiology and prevention of gastric cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 40(3):250–260CrossRefPubMed Fock KM (2014) Review article: the epidemiology and prevention of gastric cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 40(3):250–260CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sun CC, Chiu AW, Chen KK et al (2000) Assessment of a threedimensional operating system with skill tests in a pelvic trainer. Urol Int 64:154–158CrossRefPubMed Sun CC, Chiu AW, Chen KK et al (2000) Assessment of a threedimensional operating system with skill tests in a pelvic trainer. Urol Int 64:154–158CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mueller MD, Camartin C, Dreher E, Hänggi W et al (1999) Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13:469–472CrossRefPubMed Mueller MD, Camartin C, Dreher E, Hänggi W et al (1999) Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13:469–472CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kanaya S, Gomi T, Momoi H et al (2002) Delta-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic Billroth I gastrectomy: new technique of intraabdominal gastroduodenostomy. J Am Coll Surg 195:284–287CrossRefPubMed Kanaya S, Gomi T, Momoi H et al (2002) Delta-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic Billroth I gastrectomy: new technique of intraabdominal gastroduodenostomy. J Am Coll Surg 195:284–287CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Huang CM, Lin JX, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lu J, Chen QY (2013) Application of delta-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 16(2):140–143 ChinesePubMed Huang CM, Lin JX, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lu J, Chen QY (2013) Application of delta-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 16(2):140–143 ChinesePubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparative Study of the Short-Term Outcomes and Long-Term Outcomes using Total 3D and 2D Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy with Delta-Shaped Anastomosis for Gastric Cancer
Authors
Zhenxing Zhang
Zhongda Luan
Shan Wang
Minfeng Ye
Kewei Ji
Yu Zhang
Honghai Li
Yaoqing Li
Feng Tao
Kelong Tao
Guangen Xu
Publication date
28-11-2023
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgery
Print ISSN: 0972-2068
Electronic ISSN: 0973-9793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03993-9