Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2022

01-02-2022 | Laparoscopy

Comparison of three-dimensional (3D) endovision system versus ultra-high-definition 4K endovision system in minimally invasive surgical procedures: a randomized-open label pilot study

Authors: Rajinder Parshad, Shashikiran Nanjakla Jayappa, Hemanga Kumar Bhattacharjee, Suhani Suhani, Mohit Kumar Joshi, Debesh Bhoi, Lokesh Kashyap

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Experimental work comparing 3-Dimensional (3D) and 4K ultra-high-definition endovision system (4K) indicates that the latter with double the resolution of standard 2D high-definition systems may provide additional visual cues to compensate for the lack of stereoscopic vision. There is paucity of studies comparing 3D and 4K system in clinical settings. This randomized study compares 3D and 4K systems in three laparoscopic procedures of increasing complexity.

Methods

139 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (60 patients), transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair (49 patients) and laparoscopic Heller’s cardiomyotomy with anti- reflux procedure (30 patients) between May 2018 and February 2020 were randomized to undergo surgery using either 3D or 4K systems. Primary objective was to measure total operative time. Secondary objectives were to compare workload perceived by surgeons using SURG-TLX and surgeon satisfaction score. Timings of key surgical steps and peri-operative course of the patients was also recorded. Data were analyzed using Stata Corp. 2015.

Results

Patients undergoing surgery with 3D and 4K systems were comparable in their clinical and demographic profiles. The mean total operative time in 3D and 4K groups was comparable in cholecystectomy (52.7 vs 56.2, p = 0.50), TAPP (63.8 vs 69.6, p = 0.25) and Heller’s cardiomyotomy (124.7 vs 143.3, p = 0.14) with faster hiatal dissection in 3D group
(8 min, p = 0.02). Operative time was better in patients undergoing Heller’s myotomy with Angle of His accentuation with 3D by 28 min (p = 0.03). Total workload was similar in 3D and 4K groups in all the procedures but mental & physical demand was lower in 3D group in Heller’s cardiomyotomy (p = 0.03, p = 0.01), Surgeon satisfaction score was comparable in all three procedures.

Conclusion

Overall, 3D HD and 4K systems are comparable in performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, TAPP and Heller’s Cardiomyotomy. Hiatal dissection time, mental and physical task load was better with 3D in Heller’s Cardiomyotomy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kelley WE (2008) The evolution of laparoscopy and the revolution in surgery in the decade of the 1990s. JSLS 12:351–357PubMedPubMedCentral Kelley WE (2008) The evolution of laparoscopy and the revolution in surgery in the decade of the 1990s. JSLS 12:351–357PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Kourambas J, Preminger GM (2001) Advances in camera, video, and imaging technologies in laparoscopy. Urol Clin N Am 28(1):5–14CrossRef Kourambas J, Preminger GM (2001) Advances in camera, video, and imaging technologies in laparoscopy. Urol Clin N Am 28(1):5–14CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hagiike M, Phillips EH, Berci G (2007) Performance differences in laparoscopic surgical skills between true high-definition and three-chip CCD video systems. Surg Endosc 21(10):1849–1854CrossRef Hagiike M, Phillips EH, Berci G (2007) Performance differences in laparoscopic surgical skills between true high-definition and three-chip CCD video systems. Surg Endosc 21(10):1849–1854CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pierre SA, Ferrandino MN, Simmons WN, Fernandez C, Zhong P, Albala DM (2009) High definition laparoscopy: objective assessment of performance characteristics and comparison with standard laparoscopy. J Endourol 23(3):523–528CrossRef Pierre SA, Ferrandino MN, Simmons WN, Fernandez C, Zhong P, Albala DM (2009) High definition laparoscopy: objective assessment of performance characteristics and comparison with standard laparoscopy. J Endourol 23(3):523–528CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ukai K, Howarth PA (2008) Visual fatigue caused by viewing stereoscopic motion images: background, theories, and observations. Displays 29(2):106–116CrossRef Ukai K, Howarth PA (2008) Visual fatigue caused by viewing stereoscopic motion images: background, theories, and observations. Displays 29(2):106–116CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schwab K, Smith R, Brown V, Whyte M, Jourdan I (2017) Evolution of stereoscopic imaging in surgery and recent advances. World J Gastrointest Endosc 9(8):368CrossRef Schwab K, Smith R, Brown V, Whyte M, Jourdan I (2017) Evolution of stereoscopic imaging in surgery and recent advances. World J Gastrointest Endosc 9(8):368CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bilgen K, Üstün M, Karakahya M, Işik S, Şengül S, Çetinkünar S (2013) Comparison of 3D imaging and 2D imaging for performance time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(2):180–183CrossRef Bilgen K, Üstün M, Karakahya M, Işik S, Şengül S, Çetinkünar S (2013) Comparison of 3D imaging and 2D imaging for performance time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(2):180–183CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fergo C, Burcharth J, Pommergaard H-C, Kildebro N, Rosenberg J (2017) Three-dimensional laparoscopy vs 2-dimensional laparoscopy with high-definition technology for abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Am J Surg 213(1):159–170CrossRef Fergo C, Burcharth J, Pommergaard H-C, Kildebro N, Rosenberg J (2017) Three-dimensional laparoscopy vs 2-dimensional laparoscopy with high-definition technology for abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Am J Surg 213(1):159–170CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Francis NK, Bonino MA, Curtis NJ, Amparore D (2019) The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018. Surg Endosc 33(10):3251–3274CrossRef Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Francis NK, Bonino MA, Curtis NJ, Amparore D (2019) The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018. Surg Endosc 33(10):3251–3274CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Woo P (2015) 4K video-laryngoscopy and video-stroboscopy: preliminary findings. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 127:77 Woo P (2015) 4K video-laryngoscopy and video-stroboscopy: preliminary findings. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 127:77
11.
go back to reference Rigante M, Rocca GL, Lauretti L, D’Alessandris GQ, Mangiola A, Anile C (2017) Preliminary experience with 4K ultra-high definition endoscope: analysis of pros and cons in skull base surgery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 37:237–241CrossRef Rigante M, Rocca GL, Lauretti L, D’Alessandris GQ, Mangiola A, Anile C (2017) Preliminary experience with 4K ultra-high definition endoscope: analysis of pros and cons in skull base surgery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 37:237–241CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Harada H, Kanaji S, Hasegawa H, Yamamoto M, Matsuda Y, Yamashita K (2018) The effect on surgical skills of expert surgeons using 3D/HD and 2D/4K resolution monitors in laparoscopic phantom tasks. Surg Endosc 32(10):4228–4234CrossRef Harada H, Kanaji S, Hasegawa H, Yamamoto M, Matsuda Y, Yamashita K (2018) The effect on surgical skills of expert surgeons using 3D/HD and 2D/4K resolution monitors in laparoscopic phantom tasks. Surg Endosc 32(10):4228–4234CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dunstan M, Smith R, Schwab K, Scala A, Gatenby P, Whyte M (2020) Is 3D faster and safer than 4K laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A randomised-controlled trial. Surg Endosc 34(4):1729–1735CrossRef Dunstan M, Smith R, Schwab K, Scala A, Gatenby P, Whyte M (2020) Is 3D faster and safer than 4K laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A randomised-controlled trial. Surg Endosc 34(4):1729–1735CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Walraven J (1975) Amblyopia screening with random-dot stereograms. Am J Ophthalmol 80(5):893–900CrossRef Walraven J (1975) Amblyopia screening with random-dot stereograms. Am J Ophthalmol 80(5):893–900CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 351(9098):248–251CrossRef Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 351(9098):248–251CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wilson MR, Poolton JM, Malhotra N, Ngo K, Bright E, Masters RSW (2011) Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX). World J Surg 35(9):1961–1969CrossRef Wilson MR, Poolton JM, Malhotra N, Ngo K, Bright E, Masters RSW (2011) Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX). World J Surg 35(9):1961–1969CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Advances in psychology. Elsevier; 139–183. Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Advances in psychology. Elsevier; 139–183.
18.
go back to reference Tung KL, Yang GP, Li MK (2015) Comparative study of 2-D and bichanneled 3-D laparoscopic images: Is there a difference? Comparative study of 2-D and 3-D images. Asian J Endosc Surg 8(3):275–280CrossRef Tung KL, Yang GP, Li MK (2015) Comparative study of 2-D and bichanneled 3-D laparoscopic images: Is there a difference? Comparative study of 2-D and 3-D images. Asian J Endosc Surg 8(3):275–280CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Destro F, Cantone N, Lima M (2014) 3D laparoscopic monitors. Med Equip Insights 5:9–12 Destro F, Cantone N, Lima M (2014) 3D laparoscopic monitors. Med Equip Insights 5:9–12
20.
go back to reference Kunert W, Storz P, Kirschniak A (2013) For 3D laparoscopy: a step toward advanced surgical navigation: how to get maximum benefit from 3D vision. Surg Endosc 27(2):696–699CrossRef Kunert W, Storz P, Kirschniak A (2013) For 3D laparoscopy: a step toward advanced surgical navigation: how to get maximum benefit from 3D vision. Surg Endosc 27(2):696–699CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bosten JM, Goodbourn PT, Lawrance-Owen AJ, Bargary G, Hogg RE, Mollon JD (2015) A population study of binocular function. Vision Res 110:34–50CrossRef Bosten JM, Goodbourn PT, Lawrance-Owen AJ, Bargary G, Hogg RE, Mollon JD (2015) A population study of binocular function. Vision Res 110:34–50CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bohr I, Read JCA (2013) Stereoacuity with Frisby and Revised FD2 Stereo Tests. Lappe M, editor. PLoS ONE. 8(12): e82999. Bohr I, Read JCA (2013) Stereoacuity with Frisby and Revised FD2 Stereo Tests. Lappe M, editor. PLoS ONE. 8(12): e82999.
25.
go back to reference Sahu PK (2014) 3D laparoscopy—help or hype: initial experience of a tertiary health centre. J Clin Diagn Res. 8(7):1–3 Sahu PK (2014) 3D laparoscopy—help or hype: initial experience of a tertiary health centre. J Clin Diagn Res. 8(7):1–3
27.
go back to reference Patrzyk M, Klee M, Stefaniak T, Heidecke CD, Beyer K (2018) Randomized study of the influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging using a novel 3D head-mounted display (HMS-3000MT) on performance of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 32(11):4624–31CrossRef Patrzyk M, Klee M, Stefaniak T, Heidecke CD, Beyer K (2018) Randomized study of the influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging using a novel 3D head-mounted display (HMS-3000MT) on performance of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 32(11):4624–31CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Milone M, Manigrasso M, Vertaldi S, Velotti N, Aprea G, Maione F (2019) Robotic versus laparoscopic approach to treat symptomatic achalasia: systematic review with meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 32(10):1–8CrossRef Milone M, Manigrasso M, Vertaldi S, Velotti N, Aprea G, Maione F (2019) Robotic versus laparoscopic approach to treat symptomatic achalasia: systematic review with meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 32(10):1–8CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Leon P (2017) 3D vision provides shorter operative time and more accurate intraoperative surgical performance in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair compared with 2D vision: a case-control analysis. Surg Innov 24(2):155–161CrossRef Leon P (2017) 3D vision provides shorter operative time and more accurate intraoperative surgical performance in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair compared with 2D vision: a case-control analysis. Surg Innov 24(2):155–161CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hart SG, Field M (2006) NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proc Human Factors Ergon Soc Annual Meet 50(9):904–908CrossRef Hart SG, Field M (2006) NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proc Human Factors Ergon Soc Annual Meet 50(9):904–908CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Mouraviev V, Klein M, Schommer E, Thiel DD, Samavedi S, Kumar A (2016) Urology residents experience comparable workload profiles when performing live porcine nephrectomies and robotic surgery virtual reality training modules. J Robot Surg 10(1):49–56CrossRef Mouraviev V, Klein M, Schommer E, Thiel DD, Samavedi S, Kumar A (2016) Urology residents experience comparable workload profiles when performing live porcine nephrectomies and robotic surgery virtual reality training modules. J Robot Surg 10(1):49–56CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Yu D, Dural C, Morrow MMB, Yang L, Collins JW, Hallbeck S (2017) Intraoperative workload in robotic surgery assessed by wearable motion tracking sensors and questionnaires. Surg Endosc 31(2):877–886CrossRef Yu D, Dural C, Morrow MMB, Yang L, Collins JW, Hallbeck S (2017) Intraoperative workload in robotic surgery assessed by wearable motion tracking sensors and questionnaires. Surg Endosc 31(2):877–886CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Szeto GPY, Ho P, Ting ACW, Poon JTC, Cheng SWK, Tsang RCC (2009) Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms in surgeons. J Occup Rehabil 19(2):175–184CrossRef Szeto GPY, Ho P, Ting ACW, Poon JTC, Cheng SWK, Tsang RCC (2009) Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms in surgeons. J Occup Rehabil 19(2):175–184CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Park A, Lee G, Seagull FJ, Meenaghan N, Dexter D (2010) Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg 210(3):306–313CrossRef Park A, Lee G, Seagull FJ, Meenaghan N, Dexter D (2010) Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg 210(3):306–313CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of three-dimensional (3D) endovision system versus ultra-high-definition 4K endovision system in minimally invasive surgical procedures: a randomized-open label pilot study
Authors
Rajinder Parshad
Shashikiran Nanjakla Jayappa
Hemanga Kumar Bhattacharjee
Suhani Suhani
Mohit Kumar Joshi
Debesh Bhoi
Lokesh Kashyap
Publication date
01-02-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08377-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2022 Go to the issue