Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2013

01-01-2013

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: results of a prospective multicentre analysis of 4,970 patients

Authors: J. Lujan, G. Valero, S. Biondo, E. Espin, P. Parrilla, H. Ortiz

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To compare laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer and analyse the results of the multidisciplinary audited project on total mesorectal excision conducted in Spain.

Background

The safety and therapeutic efficiency of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer are controversial due to the technical difficulties it involves. A deviation from the oncological principles of mesorectal excision would mean a potential increase in local recurrence and shorter survival.

Methods

This prospective non-randomised multicentre study includes 4,970 patients with rectal cancer. The study compares perioperative, postoperative, anatomicopathological and survival variables.

Results

Five hundred and sixty five patients were excluded. Of the remaining 4,405, 3,018 (68.51 %) had open surgery (OS) and 1,387 (31.49 %) laparoscopic surgery (LS). The rate of anterior resections was higher in the LS group. The rate of intraoperative tumour perforation, number of red blood cell concentrates transfused and length of hospital stay were greater in the OS group, whereas surgical time was longer in the LS group. The incidence of complications was 45.6 % in the OS group and 38.3 % in the LS group. Involvement of the circumferential and distal margin, as well as unsatisfactory and partially satisfactory quality of the mesorectum, were greater in the OS group. There were no differences for local recurrence and survival rates.

Conclusions

According to these results, laparoscopic surgery is the best option for the surgical treatment of rectal cancer, with similar rates of local recurrence and survival, although there are oncological indicators in this study to suggest that these results can be improved with laparoscopic surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed
2.
go back to reference Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Brown JM, Medical Research Council Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery In Colorectal Cancer Trial Group (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRefPubMed Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Brown JM, Medical Research Council Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery In Colorectal Cancer Trial Group (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645CrossRefPubMed Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, Sanchez A, Frutos MD, Parrilla P (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:982–989CrossRefPubMed Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, Sanchez A, Frutos MD, Parrilla P (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:982–989CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Holm T, Johansson H, Cedermark B, Ekelund G, Rutqvist LE (1997) Influence of hospital and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Br J Surg 84:657–663CrossRefPubMed Holm T, Johansson H, Cedermark B, Ekelund G, Rutqvist LE (1997) Influence of hospital and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Br J Surg 84:657–663CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Rodríguez-Cuellar E, Ruiz López P, Romero Simó M, Landa García JI, Roig Vila JV, Ortiz Hurtado H (2010) Analysis of the quality of surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. A national study. Cir Esp 88:238–246CrossRefPubMed Rodríguez-Cuellar E, Ruiz López P, Romero Simó M, Landa García JI, Roig Vila JV, Ortiz Hurtado H (2010) Analysis of the quality of surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. A national study. Cir Esp 88:238–246CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ortiz H (2007) Total mesorectal excision: an audited training process by the Spanish Association of Surgeons. Cir Esp 82:193–194CrossRefPubMed Ortiz H (2007) Total mesorectal excision: an audited training process by the Spanish Association of Surgeons. Cir Esp 82:193–194CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Wibe A, Moller B, Norstein J, Carlsen E, Wiig JN, Heald RJ, Langmark F, Myrvold HE, Søreide O, Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group (2002) A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer-implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A National audit. Dis Colon Rectum 45:857–866CrossRefPubMed Wibe A, Moller B, Norstein J, Carlsen E, Wiig JN, Heald RJ, Langmark F, Myrvold HE, Søreide O, Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group (2002) A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer-implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A National audit. Dis Colon Rectum 45:857–866CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Heald RJ (1995) Total mesorrectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer. A Scandinavian consensus. Br J Surg 82:1297–1299CrossRefPubMed Heald RJ (1995) Total mesorrectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer. A Scandinavian consensus. Br J Surg 82:1297–1299CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bianche PP, Rosati R, Bona S, Rottoli M, Elmore U, Ceriani C, Malesci A, Montorsi M (2007) Laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: a prospective analysis of patient survival and outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 50:2047–2053CrossRef Bianche PP, Rosati R, Bona S, Rottoli M, Elmore U, Ceriani C, Malesci A, Montorsi M (2007) Laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: a prospective analysis of patient survival and outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 50:2047–2053CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Badvie S, Hallan RI (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96(12):1494–1495 (author reply 1496)CrossRefPubMed Badvie S, Hallan RI (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96(12):1494–1495 (author reply 1496)CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Shrikhande SV, Marda S, Goel M, Shetty G (2010) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Lancet Oncol 11(10):919–920 (author reply 920–921)CrossRefPubMed Shrikhande SV, Marda S, Goel M, Shetty G (2010) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Lancet Oncol 11(10):919–920 (author reply 920–921)CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Breukink S, Pierie J, Wiggers T (2006) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:4 Breukink S, Pierie J, Wiggers T (2006) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:4
15.
go back to reference Huang MJ, Liang JL, Wang H, Kang L, Deng YH, Wang JP (2011) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 26(4):415–421CrossRefPubMed Huang MJ, Liang JL, Wang H, Kang L, Deng YH, Wang JP (2011) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 26(4):415–421CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, Lei WZ, Yu YY, Cheng Z, Li L, Shu Y, Wang TC (2004) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 18:1211–1215CrossRefPubMed Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, Lei WZ, Yu YY, Cheng Z, Li L, Shu Y, Wang TC (2004) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 18:1211–1215CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Miyajima N, Fukunaga M, Hasegawa H, Tanaka J, Okuda J, Watanabe M, Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery (2009) Results of a multicenter study of 1057 cases of rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23:113–118CrossRefPubMed Miyajima N, Fukunaga M, Hasegawa H, Tanaka J, Okuda J, Watanabe M, Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery (2009) Results of a multicenter study of 1057 cases of rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23:113–118CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P (1998) A prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187:46–54CrossRefPubMed Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P (1998) A prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187:46–54CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Scheidbach H, Rose J, Huegel O, Yildirim C, Köckerling F (2004) Results of laparoscopic treatment of rectal cancer: analysis of 520 patients. Tech Coloproctol 8:S22–S24CrossRefPubMed Scheidbach H, Rose J, Huegel O, Yildirim C, Köckerling F (2004) Results of laparoscopic treatment of rectal cancer: analysis of 520 patients. Tech Coloproctol 8:S22–S24CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Sröhlein MA, Grützner KU, Jauch KW, Heiss MM (2008) Comparison of laparoscopic vs open access surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 51:385–391CrossRef Sröhlein MA, Grützner KU, Jauch KW, Heiss MM (2008) Comparison of laparoscopic vs open access surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 51:385–391CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Couture J, O’Callaghan C, Myint AS, Bessell E, Thompson LC, Parmar M, Stephens RJ, Sebag-Montefiore D, MRC CR07/NCIC-CTG CO16 Trial Investigators, NCRI Colorectal Cancer Study Group (2009) Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 373:821–828CrossRefPubMed Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Couture J, O’Callaghan C, Myint AS, Bessell E, Thompson LC, Parmar M, Stephens RJ, Sebag-Montefiore D, MRC CR07/NCIC-CTG CO16 Trial Investigators, NCRI Colorectal Cancer Study Group (2009) Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 373:821–828CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wibe A, Rendedal PR, Svensson E, Norstein J, Eide TJ, Myrvold HE, Søreide O (2002) Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 89:327–334CrossRefPubMed Wibe A, Rendedal PR, Svensson E, Norstein J, Eide TJ, Myrvold HE, Søreide O (2002) Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 89:327–334CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Biondo S, Ortiz H, Lujan J, Codina-Cazador A, Espin E, Garcia-Granero E, Kreisler E, de Miguel M, Alos R, Echeverria A (2010) Quality of mesorectum alter laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Results of an audited teaching programme in Spain. Colorectal Dis 12(1):23–32CrossRef Biondo S, Ortiz H, Lujan J, Codina-Cazador A, Espin E, Garcia-Granero E, Kreisler E, de Miguel M, Alos R, Echeverria A (2010) Quality of mesorectum alter laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Results of an audited teaching programme in Spain. Colorectal Dis 12(1):23–32CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tang R, Chen HH, Wang YL, Changchien CR, Chen JS, Hsu KC, Chiang JM, Wang JY (2001) Risk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection of the colon and rectum: a single-center prospective study of 2,809 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 234:181–189CrossRefPubMed Tang R, Chen HH, Wang YL, Changchien CR, Chen JS, Hsu KC, Chiang JM, Wang JY (2001) Risk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection of the colon and rectum: a single-center prospective study of 2,809 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 234:181–189CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Amato A, Pescatori M (2006) Perioperative blood transfusions for the recurrence of colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD005033 Amato A, Pescatori M (2006) Perioperative blood transfusions for the recurrence of colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD005033
26.
go back to reference Mynster T, Nielsen HJ (2000) The impact of storage time of transfused blood on postoperative infectious complications in rectal cancer surgery. Danish RANX05 Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Scand J Gastroenterol 35:212–217CrossRefPubMed Mynster T, Nielsen HJ (2000) The impact of storage time of transfused blood on postoperative infectious complications in rectal cancer surgery. Danish RANX05 Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Scand J Gastroenterol 35:212–217CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Fleshman JW, Wexner SD, Anvari M, LaTulippe JF, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Read TE, Nogueras JJ, Weiss EG (1999) Laparoscopic vs open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42:930–939CrossRefPubMed Fleshman JW, Wexner SD, Anvari M, LaTulippe JF, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Read TE, Nogueras JJ, Weiss EG (1999) Laparoscopic vs open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42:930–939CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke Ph, Thorpe H, Walker J, Quirke P, Guillou PJ (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASSICC trial): multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed Guillou PJ, Quirke Ph, Thorpe H, Walker J, Quirke P, Guillou PJ (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASSICC trial): multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Capretti G, Di Carlo V (2007) Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 50:464–471CrossRefPubMed Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Capretti G, Di Carlo V (2007) Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 50:464–471CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: results of a prospective multicentre analysis of 4,970 patients
Authors
J. Lujan
G. Valero
S. Biondo
E. Espin
P. Parrilla
H. Ortiz
Publication date
01-01-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2444-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2013 Go to the issue