Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Scientific Report

Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Posterior Sectionectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a High-Volume Center: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Authors: Jinsoo Rhu, Sung Joo Kim, Gyu Seong Choi, Jong Man Kim, Jae-Won Joh, Choon Hyuck David Kwon

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

While minimal invasive surgery is becoming popular in liver resection, right posterior sectionectomy (RPS) is still considered as a difficult procedure. We summarize the clinical data and investigate the feasibility of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by comparing its outcomes with those of open right posterior sectionectomy (ORPS).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 191 patients who underwent RPS for HCC during January 2009 to August 2016 at Samsung Medical Center. After 1:2 propensity score matching, 53 patients in LRPS group were matched to 97 patients in ORPS group.

Results

There was no statistical difference in preoperative data. While operation time was significantly longer in LRPS group (381.1 ± 118.7 vs. 234.4 ± 63.7 min, P < 0.001), transfusion rate (13.2 vs. 2.1%, P = 0.061) and complication rate (9.4 vs. 8.3%, P = 0.709) were not statistically different between groups. Clustered Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for matched paired data showed no difference in both disease-free survival (P = 0.607) and overall survival (P = 0.858).

Conclusions

In HCC, LRPS can be performed safely compared to ORPS, regarding the operative outcome, patient recovery, and oncological outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Grazi GL, Ercolani G, Pierangeli F et al (2001) Improved results of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis give the procedure added value. Ann Surg 234:71–78CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grazi GL, Ercolani G, Pierangeli F et al (2001) Improved results of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis give the procedure added value. Ann Surg 234:71–78CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Regimbeau JM, Kianmanesh R, Farges O et al (2002) Extent of liver resection influences the outcome in patients with cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery 131:311–317CrossRefPubMed Regimbeau JM, Kianmanesh R, Farges O et al (2002) Extent of liver resection influences the outcome in patients with cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery 131:311–317CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bryant R, Laurent A, Tayar C et al (2009) Laparoscopic liver resection-understanding its role in current practice: the Henri Mondor Hospital experience. Ann Surg 250:103–111CrossRefPubMed Bryant R, Laurent A, Tayar C et al (2009) Laparoscopic liver resection-understanding its role in current practice: the Henri Mondor Hospital experience. Ann Surg 250:103–111CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cheung TT, Poon RT, Yuen WK et al (2013) Long-term survival analysis of pure laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a single-center experience. Ann Surg 257:506–511CrossRefPubMed Cheung TT, Poon RT, Yuen WK et al (2013) Long-term survival analysis of pure laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a single-center experience. Ann Surg 257:506–511CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Tranchart H, Di Giuro G, Lainas P et al (2010) Laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study. Surg Endosc 24:1170–1176CrossRefPubMed Tranchart H, Di Giuro G, Lainas P et al (2010) Laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study. Surg Endosc 24:1170–1176CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS et al (2009) Outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection for lesions located in the right side of the liver. Arch Surg 144:25–29CrossRefPubMed Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS et al (2009) Outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection for lesions located in the right side of the liver. Arch Surg 144:25–29CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gigot JF, Glineur D, Santiago Azagra J et al (2002) Laparoscopic liver resection for malignant liver tumors: preliminary results of a multicenter European study. Ann Surg 236:90–97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gigot JF, Glineur D, Santiago Azagra J et al (2002) Laparoscopic liver resection for malignant liver tumors: preliminary results of a multicenter European study. Ann Surg 236:90–97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Kaneko H, Takagi S, Shiba T (1996) Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy and left lateral segmentectomy: technique and results of a clinical series. Surgery 120:468–475CrossRefPubMed Kaneko H, Takagi S, Shiba T (1996) Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy and left lateral segmentectomy: technique and results of a clinical series. Surgery 120:468–475CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830CrossRefPubMed Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629PubMed Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629PubMed
11.
go back to reference Kang SH, Kim KH, Shin MH et al (2016) Surgical outcomes following laparoscopic major hepatectomy for various liver diseases. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e5182CrossRefPubMedCentral Kang SH, Kim KH, Shin MH et al (2016) Surgical outcomes following laparoscopic major hepatectomy for various liver diseases. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e5182CrossRefPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Yoon YS, Han HS, Choi YS et al (2006) Total laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:274–277CrossRefPubMed Yoon YS, Han HS, Choi YS et al (2006) Total laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:274–277CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS et al (2015) Outcomes of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 158:135–141CrossRefPubMed Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS et al (2015) Outcomes of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 158:135–141CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lee W, Han HS, Yoon YS et al (2016) Comparison of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma located in the posterosuperior segments or anterolateral segments: a case-matched analysis. Surgery 160:1219–1226CrossRefPubMed Lee W, Han HS, Yoon YS et al (2016) Comparison of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma located in the posterosuperior segments or anterolateral segments: a case-matched analysis. Surgery 160:1219–1226CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ban D, Kudo A, Ito H et al (2015) The difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection. Updates Surg 67:123–128CrossRefPubMed Ban D, Kudo A, Ito H et al (2015) The difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection. Updates Surg 67:123–128CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H et al (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21:745–753CrossRefPubMed Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H et al (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21:745–753CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS et al (2008) Experiences of laparoscopic liver resection including lesions in the posterosuperior segments of the liver. Surg Endosc 22:2344–2349CrossRefPubMed Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS et al (2008) Experiences of laparoscopic liver resection including lesions in the posterosuperior segments of the liver. Surg Endosc 22:2344–2349CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Costi R, Capelluto E, Sperduto N et al (2003) Laparoscopic right posterior hepatic bisegmentectomy (segments VII–VIII). Surg Endosc 17:162PubMed Costi R, Capelluto E, Sperduto N et al (2003) Laparoscopic right posterior hepatic bisegmentectomy (segments VII–VIII). Surg Endosc 17:162PubMed
21.
go back to reference Gumbs AA, Gayet B (2008) Video: the lateral laparoscopic approach to lesions in the posterior segments. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1154CrossRefPubMed Gumbs AA, Gayet B (2008) Video: the lateral laparoscopic approach to lesions in the posterior segments. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1154CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Lee N, Cho CW, Kim JM et al (2017) Application of temporary inflow control of the Glissonean pedicle method provides a safe and easy technique for totally laparoscopic hemihepatectomy by Glissonean approach. Ann Surg Treat Res 92:383–386CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee N, Cho CW, Kim JM et al (2017) Application of temporary inflow control of the Glissonean pedicle method provides a safe and easy technique for totally laparoscopic hemihepatectomy by Glissonean approach. Ann Surg Treat Res 92:383–386CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Austin PC (2008) A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Stat Med 27:2037–2049CrossRefPubMed Austin PC (2008) A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Stat Med 27:2037–2049CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 46:399–424CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 46:399–424CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Normand ST, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E et al (2001) Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores. J Clin Epidemiol 54:387–398CrossRefPubMed Normand ST, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E et al (2001) Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores. J Clin Epidemiol 54:387–398CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Jung KU, Kim HC, Cho YB et al (2014) Outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal and hepatic resection for patients with colorectal cancers: a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:229–235CrossRefPubMed Jung KU, Kim HC, Cho YB et al (2014) Outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal and hepatic resection for patients with colorectal cancers: a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:229–235CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Lee S, Hyuck David Kwon C, Man Kim J et al (2014) Time of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver resection and alpha-fetoprotein are important prognostic factors for salvage liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 20:1057–1063CrossRefPubMed Lee S, Hyuck David Kwon C, Man Kim J et al (2014) Time of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver resection and alpha-fetoprotein are important prognostic factors for salvage liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 20:1057–1063CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Rhu J, Heo JS, Choi SH et al (2017) Streamline flow of the portal vein affects the lobar distribution of colorectal liver metastases and has a clinical impact on survival. Ann Surg Treat Res 92:348–354CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rhu J, Heo JS, Choi SH et al (2017) Streamline flow of the portal vein affects the lobar distribution of colorectal liver metastases and has a clinical impact on survival. Ann Surg Treat Res 92:348–354CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Posterior Sectionectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a High-Volume Center: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis
Authors
Jinsoo Rhu
Sung Joo Kim
Gyu Seong Choi
Jong Man Kim
Jae-Won Joh
Choon Hyuck David Kwon
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4531-z

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

World Journal of Surgery 9/2018 Go to the issue