Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2010

01-02-2010

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison

Authors: Hong-Bo Wei, Jiang-Long Huang, Zong-Heng Zheng, Bo Wei, Feng Zheng, Wan-Shou Qiu, Wei-Ping Guo, Tu-Feng Chen, Tian-Bao Wang

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Whether laparoscopy offers a benefit over open surgery in the management of acute appendicitis or not remains a subject of controversy despite the publication of numerous randomized studies. This study aimed to compare laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) with open appendectomy (OA) and to ascertain its therapeutic benefit.

Methods

Adult patients older than 14 years presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of acute appendicitis were randomized to undergo either LA or OA from January 2006 to December 2007. Comparisons were based on operating time, time until return to a general diet, time until return to normal activity and work, length of hospital stay, billed charges, and postoperative complications.

Results

The study enrolled 220 patients: 108 to undergo OA and 112 to undergo LA. The groups were similar in terms of clinicopathologic characteristics. The operating time seemed to be shorter for the OA patients than for the LA patients, but the difference was not significant (LA, 30 ± 15.2 min vs. OA, 28.7 ± 16.3 min; p > 0.05). The hospital stay of 4.1 ± 1.5 days for the LA group and 7.2 ± 1.7 days for the OA group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Laparoscopic appendectomy remained associated with a shorter time until return to a general diet (LA, 20.2 ± 12.4 h vs. OA, 36.5 ± 10 h; p < 0.05), to normal activity (LA, 9.1 ± 4.2 days vs. OA, 13.7 ± 5.8 days; p < 0.05), and to work (LA, 21.2 ± 3.5 days vs. OA, 27.7 ± 4.9 days; p < 0.05). The billed charges appeared to be higher for LA (LA, 5,720.3 ± 115.7 yuan vs. OA, 5,310 ± 575.4 yuan), but this difference failed to be clinically important or statistically significant (p > 0.05). Wound infections were more common after OA (n = 14) than after LA (n = 0) (p < 0.05). Intraabdominal abscesses occurred for two patients in the LA group and nine patients in the OA group (p < 0.05). Postoperative ileus occurred with frequencies of 0% in the LA group and 7.4% in the OA group (p < 0.05). The rate for overall complications was significantly lower in the LA group.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic appendectomy is a useful tool in the treatment of acute appendicitis. Its advantages lie in its minimal invasiveness, its better cosmetic outcome, its lower rate of complications based on surgical expertise and state-of-the-art equipment. It can be recommended as an adoptable method for the routine patient with appendicitis.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–450 Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–450
3.
go back to reference Merhoff AM, Merhoff GC, Franklin ME (2000) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 179:375–378CrossRefPubMed Merhoff AM, Merhoff GC, Franklin ME (2000) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 179:375–378CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–448PubMed Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–448PubMed
5.
go back to reference Helmy MA (2001) A comparative study between laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in men. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 31:555–562PubMed Helmy MA (2001) A comparative study between laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in men. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 31:555–562PubMed
6.
go back to reference Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88:200–205CrossRefPubMed Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88:200–205CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Neugebauer E, Troidl H, Kum CK, Eypasch E, Miserez M, Paul A (1995) The E.A.E.S. consensus development conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair: consensus statements—September 1994. Surg Endosc 9:550–563PubMed Neugebauer E, Troidl H, Kum CK, Eypasch E, Miserez M, Paul A (1995) The E.A.E.S. consensus development conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair: consensus statements—September 1994. Surg Endosc 9:550–563PubMed
8.
go back to reference So JB, Chiong EC, Chiong E, Cheah WK, Lomanto D, Goh P, Kum CK (2002) Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. World J Surg 26:1485–1488CrossRefPubMed So JB, Chiong EC, Chiong E, Cheah WK, Lomanto D, Goh P, Kum CK (2002) Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. World J Surg 26:1485–1488CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Long KH, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, Helgeson ER, Harmsen WS, Smith CD, Ilstrup DM, Baerga-Varela Y, Sarr MG, Laparoscopic Appendectomy Interest Group (2001) A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery 129:390–400PubMed Long KH, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, Helgeson ER, Harmsen WS, Smith CD, Ilstrup DM, Baerga-Varela Y, Sarr MG, Laparoscopic Appendectomy Interest Group (2001) A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery 129:390–400PubMed
10.
go back to reference Lavonius MI, Liesjarvi S, Ovaska J, Pajulo O, Ristkari S, Alanen M (2001) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a prospective randomised study. Eur J Pediatr Surg 11:235–238CrossRefPubMed Lavonius MI, Liesjarvi S, Ovaska J, Pajulo O, Ristkari S, Alanen M (2001) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a prospective randomised study. Eur J Pediatr Surg 11:235–238CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Paya K, Fakhari M, Rauhofer U (2000) Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a comparison of complications. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 4:121–124 Paya K, Fakhari M, Rauhofer U (2000) Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a comparison of complications. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 4:121–124
12.
go back to reference Vernon AH, Georgeson KE, Harmon CM (2004) Pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 18:75–79CrossRefPubMed Vernon AH, Georgeson KE, Harmon CM (2004) Pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 18:75–79CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Koontz CS, Smith LA, Burkholder HC, Higdon K, Aderhold R, Carr M (2006) Video-assisted transumbilical appendectomy in children. J Pediatr Surg 4:710–712CrossRef Koontz CS, Smith LA, Burkholder HC, Higdon K, Aderhold R, Carr M (2006) Video-assisted transumbilical appendectomy in children. J Pediatr Surg 4:710–712CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K (2001) Single blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children. Br J Surg 88:510–514CrossRefPubMed Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K (2001) Single blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children. Br J Surg 88:510–514CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Meguerditchian AN, Prasil P, Cloutier R, Leclerc S, Peloquin J, Roy G (2002) Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a favorable alternative in simple and complicated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 37:695–698CrossRefPubMed Meguerditchian AN, Prasil P, Cloutier R, Leclerc S, Peloquin J, Roy G (2002) Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a favorable alternative in simple and complicated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 37:695–698CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Peiser JG, Greenberg D (2002) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital. Isr Med Assoc J 4:91–94PubMed Peiser JG, Greenberg D (2002) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital. Isr Med Assoc J 4:91–94PubMed
17.
go back to reference Bennett J, Boddy A, Rhodes M (2007) Choice of approach for appendicectomy: a meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:245–255CrossRefPubMed Bennett J, Boddy A, Rhodes M (2007) Choice of approach for appendicectomy: a meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:245–255CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison
Authors
Hong-Bo Wei
Jiang-Long Huang
Zong-Heng Zheng
Bo Wei
Feng Zheng
Wan-Shou Qiu
Wei-Ping Guo
Tu-Feng Chen
Tian-Bao Wang
Publication date
01-02-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0563-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2010 Go to the issue