Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 7/2017

01-07-2017 | Clinical Opinion

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for obstructive defecation syndrome: still the way to go?

Authors: Stefan Riss, Joseph Winstanley, Mhairi Collie

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 7/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) has become a popular surgical technique for treating women with full-thickness rectal prolapse with a low recurrence rate, as demonstrated by several studies. In addition, it is increasingly applied to female patients with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) caused by intussusception ± rectocele. Functional improvement can be achieved in a high number of patients with ODS, but expectations need to be discussed carefully, as a few patients may not benefit at all. In particular, long-term data on functional outcome and complications following laparoscopic VMR for ODS are still lacking in the literature. Notably, laparoscopic VMR appears to be better than alternative operations for prolapse, intussusception, and rectocele in terms of efficacy, recurrence rates, and adverse effects, but there is a lack of evidence directly comparing techniques through randomized controlled trials; thus, its exact role stills needs to be defined in the future.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Consten EC, van Iersel JJ, Verheijen PM, Broeders IA, Wolthuis AM, D’Hoore A. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: an observational study of 919 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2015;262(5):742–747; discussion 747–748. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001401.CrossRefPubMed Consten EC, van Iersel JJ, Verheijen PM, Broeders IA, Wolthuis AM, D’Hoore A. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: an observational study of 919 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2015;262(5):742–747; discussion 747–748. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000001401​.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Makela-Kaikkonen JK, Rautio TT, Koivurova S, Paakko E, Ohtonen P, Biancari F, et al. Anatomical and functional changes to the pelvic floor after robotic versus laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a randomised study. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(12):1837–45. doi:10.1007/s00192-016-3048-y.CrossRefPubMed Makela-Kaikkonen JK, Rautio TT, Koivurova S, Paakko E, Ohtonen P, Biancari F, et al. Anatomical and functional changes to the pelvic floor after robotic versus laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a randomised study. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(12):1837–45. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-016-3048-y.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Van Iersel JJ, Paulides TJ, Verheijen PM, Lumley JW, Broeders IA, Consten EC. Current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external and internal rectal prolapse. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(21):4977–87. doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i21.4977. Van Iersel JJ, Paulides TJ, Verheijen PM, Lumley JW, Broeders IA, Consten EC. Current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external and internal rectal prolapse. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(21):4977–87. doi:10.​3748/​wjg.​v22.​i21.​4977.
5.
go back to reference Guzman Rojas R, Kamisan Atan I, Shek KL, Dietz HP. The prevalence of abnormal posterior compartment anatomy and its association with obstructed defecation symptoms in urogynecological patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(6):939–44. doi:10.1007/s00192-015-2914-3.CrossRefPubMed Guzman Rojas R, Kamisan Atan I, Shek KL, Dietz HP. The prevalence of abnormal posterior compartment anatomy and its association with obstructed defecation symptoms in urogynecological patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(6):939–44. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-015-2914-3.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Van Iersel JJ, de Witte CJ, Verheijen PM, Broeders IA, Lenters E, Consten EC, et al. Robot-assisted sacrocolporectopexy for multicompartment prolapse of the pelvic floor: a prospective cohort study evaluating functional and sexual outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(10):968–74. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000669. Van Iersel JJ, de Witte CJ, Verheijen PM, Broeders IA, Lenters E, Consten EC, et al. Robot-assisted sacrocolporectopexy for multicompartment prolapse of the pelvic floor: a prospective cohort study evaluating functional and sexual outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(10):968–74. doi:10.​1097/​DCR.​0000000000000669​.
7.
go back to reference Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5–26. doi:10.1007/s00192-009-0976-9.CrossRefPubMed Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5–26. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-009-0976-9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Van der Hagen SJ, van Gemert WG, Soeters PB, de Wet H, Baeten CG. Transvaginal posterior colporrhaphy combined with laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for isolated grade III rectocele: a prospective study of 27 patients. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(11):1398–402. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03023.x. Van der Hagen SJ, van Gemert WG, Soeters PB, de Wet H, Baeten CG. Transvaginal posterior colporrhaphy combined with laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for isolated grade III rectocele: a prospective study of 27 patients. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(11):1398–402. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1463-1318.​2012.​03023.​x.
12.
go back to reference Gosselink MP, Joshi H, Adusumilli S, van Onkelen RS, Fourie S, Hompes R, et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for faecal incontinence: equivalent benefit is seen in internal and external rectal prolapse. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(3):558–63. doi:10.1007/s11605-014-2696-9.CrossRefPubMed Gosselink MP, Joshi H, Adusumilli S, van Onkelen RS, Fourie S, Hompes R, et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for faecal incontinence: equivalent benefit is seen in internal and external rectal prolapse. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(3):558–63. doi:10.​1007/​s11605-014-2696-9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gladman MA, Scott SM, Williams NS, Lunniss PJ. Clinical and physiological findings, and possible aetiological factors of rectal hyposensitivity. Br J Surg. 2003;90(7):860–6. doi:10.1002/bjs.4103.CrossRefPubMed Gladman MA, Scott SM, Williams NS, Lunniss PJ. Clinical and physiological findings, and possible aetiological factors of rectal hyposensitivity. Br J Surg. 2003;90(7):860–6. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​4103.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Engel AF, Kamm MA. The acute effect of straining on pelvic floor neurological function. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1994;9(1):8–12.CrossRefPubMed Engel AF, Kamm MA. The acute effect of straining on pelvic floor neurological function. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1994;9(1):8–12.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Schwandner O, Stuto A. Stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year results of the European STARR registry. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(7):1205–1212; discussion 1212–1204. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a9120f. Jayne DG, Schwandner O, Stuto A. Stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year results of the European STARR registry. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(7):1205–1212; discussion 1212–1204. doi:10.​1007/​DCR.​0b013e3181a9120f​.
21.
go back to reference Nieminen K, Hiltunen KM, Laitinen J, Oksala J, Heinonen PK. Transanal or vaginal approach to rectocele repair: a prospective, randomized pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(10):1636–42.CrossRefPubMed Nieminen K, Hiltunen KM, Laitinen J, Oksala J, Heinonen PK. Transanal or vaginal approach to rectocele repair: a prospective, randomized pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(10):1636–42.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for obstructive defecation syndrome: still the way to go?
Authors
Stefan Riss
Joseph Winstanley
Mhairi Collie
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3378-4

Other articles of this Issue 7/2017

International Urogynecology Journal 7/2017 Go to the issue