Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2006

01-08-2006 | Original articles

Laparoscopic total colectomy for colorectal cancers: a comparative study

Authors: S. S. M. Ng, J. C. M. Li, J. F. Y. Lee, R.Y. C. Yiu, K. L. Leung

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

No previous report could be found in the literature comparing laparoscopic and open total colectomy for colorectal cancers, especially synchronous colorectal cancers. This study aimed to compare the short-term clinical outcomes and oncologic results of laparoscopic and open total colectomy or proctocolectomy for colorectal cancers.

Methods

Between July 1997 and January 2005, six patients with colorectal cancers underwent elective laparoscopic total colectomy or proctocolectomy at the authors’ institution. Clinical data for 12 patients who underwent elective open total colectomy or proctocolectomy for colorectal cancers during the same period were prospectively collected and compared.

Results

The median follow-up periods were 43.9 months for the laparoscopic group and 48.2 months for the open group. Conversion to open procedure was required for one patient (16.7%) in the laparoscopic group because of bleeding. The median operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (427.5 min; range, 280–480 min vs 172.5 min; range, 90–260 min; p = 0.001). The patients in the laparoscopic group required a significantly shorter duration of parenteral analgesia (3 vs 5 days; p = 0.01), but there were no differences in time to first bowel motion, time to resumption of diet, time to full ambulation, and duration of hospital stay between the two groups. Perioperative morbidity rates were comparable between the two groups, and there was no operative mortality. The oncologic results, including number of lymph nodes removed, recurrence rates, and survival rates, were similar in the two groups.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic total colectomy has short-term clinical outcomes (postoperative recovery and perioperative morbidity and mortality rates) and oncologic results similar to those of open surgery for treating patients with colorectal cancers. Our study has shown that the only advantage of laparoscopic over open surgery is a shorter duration of analgesic requirement, but at the expense of a longer operative time.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91: 1111–1124PubMedCrossRef Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91: 1111–1124PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Araki Y, Isomoto H, Matsumoto A, Yasunaga M, Toh U, Yamauchi K, Shirouzu K (1998) Clinical aspects of total colectomy: laparoscopic versus open technique for familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis. Kurume Med J 45: 203–207PubMed Araki Y, Isomoto H, Matsumoto A, Yasunaga M, Toh U, Yamauchi K, Shirouzu K (1998) Clinical aspects of total colectomy: laparoscopic versus open technique for familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis. Kurume Med J 45: 203–207PubMed
3.
go back to reference Balli JE, Franklin ME, Almeida JA, Glass JL, Diaz JA, Reymond M (2000) How to prevent port-site metastases in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 14: 1034–1036PubMedCrossRef Balli JE, Franklin ME, Almeida JA, Glass JL, Diaz JA, Reymond M (2000) How to prevent port-site metastases in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 14: 1034–1036PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350: 2050–2059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350: 2050–2059CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359: 2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359: 2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, Lai PB, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363: 1187–192PubMedCrossRef Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, Lai PB, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363: 1187–192PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lointier PH, Lautard M, Massoni C, Ferrier C, Dapoigny M (1993) Laparoscopically assisted subtotal colectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 3: 439–453PubMed Lointier PH, Lautard M, Massoni C, Ferrier C, Dapoigny M (1993) Laparoscopically assisted subtotal colectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 3: 439–453PubMed
8.
go back to reference Milsom JW, Ludwig KA, Church JM, Garcia-Ruiz A (1997) Laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 40: 675–678PubMedCrossRef Milsom JW, Ludwig KA, Church JM, Garcia-Ruiz A (1997) Laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 40: 675–678PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pokala N, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2005) Laparoscopic vs open total colectomy: a case-matched comparative study. Surg Endosc 19: 531–535PubMedCrossRef Pokala N, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2005) Laparoscopic vs open total colectomy: a case-matched comparative study. Surg Endosc 19: 531–535PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Seshadri PA, Poulin EC, Schlachta CM, Cadeddu MO, Mamazza J (2001) Does a laparoscopic approach to total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy offer advantages? Surg Endosc 15: 837–842PubMedCrossRef Seshadri PA, Poulin EC, Schlachta CM, Cadeddu MO, Mamazza J (2001) Does a laparoscopic approach to total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy offer advantages? Surg Endosc 15: 837–842PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ, Meijer DW, Buunen M, Jeekel J, Anderberg B, Cuesta MA, Cuschieri A, Fingerhut A, Fleshman JW, Guillou PJ, Haglind E, Himpens J, Jacobi CA, Jakimowicz JJ, Koeckerling F, Lacy AM, Lezoche E, Monson JR, Morino M, Neugebauer E, Wexner SD, Whelan RL, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18: 1163–1185PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ, Meijer DW, Buunen M, Jeekel J, Anderberg B, Cuesta MA, Cuschieri A, Fingerhut A, Fleshman JW, Guillou PJ, Haglind E, Himpens J, Jacobi CA, Jakimowicz JJ, Koeckerling F, Lacy AM, Lezoche E, Monson JR, Morino M, Neugebauer E, Wexner SD, Whelan RL, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18: 1163–1185PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic total colectomy for colorectal cancers: a comparative study
Authors
S. S. M. Ng
J. C. M. Li
J. F. Y. Lee
R.Y. C. Yiu
K. L. Leung
Publication date
01-08-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2006
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0330-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2006

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2006 Go to the issue