Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2007

01-02-2007 | Video

Laparoscopic rectopexy

Authors: J. W. Nunoo-Mensah, J. E. Efron, T. M. Young-Fadok

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Abdominal rectopexy has been advocated as the treatment of choice for complete rectal prolapse. Recurrence rates are low raging from 0–12% and fecal continence has been documented to improve in 3–75% of patients. As most patients are elderly and not always fit enough to undergo abdominal procedure, various perineal approaches have been advocated. Depending on the type and extent of the operation, these procedures have a recurrence of up to 38%. Laparoscopic rectopexy represents the latest development in the evolution of surgical treatment of rectal prolapse. This technique aims to combine the good functional outcome of the open abdominal procedure with the low postoperative morbidity of minimal invasive surgery. We present a laparosocpic rectopexy on 72-year-old lady with a 10-year history of fecal incontinence and mucosal rectal prolapse.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ashari LH, Lumley JW, Stevenson AR, Stitz RW (2005) Laparoscopically assisted resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: ten years’ experience. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 982–987CrossRef Ashari LH, Lumley JW, Stevenson AR, Stitz RW (2005) Laparoscopically assisted resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: ten years’ experience. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 982–987CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kariv Y, Delaney CP, Casillas S, Hammel J, Nocero J, Bast J, Brady K, Fazio VW, Senagore AJ (2006) Long-term outcome after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 20: 35–42CrossRef Kariv Y, Delaney CP, Casillas S, Hammel J, Nocero J, Bast J, Brady K, Fazio VW, Senagore AJ (2006) Long-term outcome after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 20: 35–42CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Karulf RE, Madoff RD, Goldberg SM (2001) Rectal prolapse. Curr Probl Surg 38: 771–832CrossRef Karulf RE, Madoff RD, Goldberg SM (2001) Rectal prolapse. Curr Probl Surg 38: 771–832CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Madiba TE, Baig MK, Wexner SD (2005) Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 140: 63–73CrossRef Madiba TE, Baig MK, Wexner SD (2005) Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 140: 63–73CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Purkayastha S, Tekkis P, Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Paraskevas P, Ziprin P, Darzi A (2005) A comparison of open vs laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 1930–1940CrossRef Purkayastha S, Tekkis P, Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Paraskevas P, Ziprin P, Darzi A (2005) A comparison of open vs laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 1930–1940CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Senagore AJ (2003) Management of rectal prolapse: the role of laparoscopic approaches. Semin Laparosc Surg 10: 197–202PubMed Senagore AJ (2003) Management of rectal prolapse: the role of laparoscopic approaches. Semin Laparosc Surg 10: 197–202PubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic rectopexy
Authors
J. W. Nunoo-Mensah
J. E. Efron
T. M. Young-Fadok
Publication date
01-02-2007
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-0136-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2007 Go to the issue