Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2016

01-04-2016

Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: No different than a laparoscopic ventral hernia repair?

Authors: Salomon Levy, Margaret A. Plymale, Michael T. Miller, Daniel L. Davenport, John Scott Roth

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Parastomal hernia (PH) is a common complication when a stoma is used. The high incidence (35–50 %) and patient longevity have created a situation where patients are being referred for consideration of repair with more frequency. Due to the presence of an ostomy and the increased bacterial contamination of the area, the insertion of a prosthetic material is concerning for complications. Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias utilizing a modified Sugarbaker technique has been demonstrated to have excellent outcomes. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that laparoscopic PH repair has outcomes similar to laparoscopic ventral hernia (LVH) repair without the presence of a stoma.

Methods

After obtaining institutional review board approval, patients with parastomal hernia who underwent laparoscopic repair using Sugarbaker technique between 2009 and 2012 were compared to patients with ventral hernias who underwent LVH repair in a retrospective review, with a match of 1:3. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, operative time, defect size, and mesh size. Outcomes and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

Twenty patients underwent Sugarbaker repair, and these cases were compared to 60 patients with ventral hernia that received LVH repair. There was no statistically significant difference in age, BMI, smoking status, ASA score, defect size, or mesh size between groups. Operative time was significantly longer in the PH group: 172 ± 35 versus the LVH group: 94 ± 32 min (p < 0.1). Length of stay was longer, 3 days (3–5.5) for PH versus 1 day (1–2.8) for LVH, p < 0.1. The two groups did not differ in terms of wound complications or recurrence, with a median follow-up of 37 days (IQ range 27–518).

Conclusion

The Sugarbaker technique is as safe as LVH repair with no more complications given the presence of a stoma.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Pringle W, Swan E (2001) Continuing care after discharge from hospital for stoma patients. Br J Nurs 10:1275–1288CrossRefPubMed Pringle W, Swan E (2001) Continuing care after discharge from hospital for stoma patients. Br J Nurs 10:1275–1288CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK (1994) Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:916–920CrossRefPubMed Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK (1994) Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:916–920CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Birgitta ME, Hansson MD (2012) Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg 255:685–695CrossRef Birgitta ME, Hansson MD (2012) Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg 255:685–695CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hansson E (2013) The laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique is safe and has a low recurrence rate: a multicenter cohort study. Surg Endosc 27:494–500CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hansson E (2013) The laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique is safe and has a low recurrence rate: a multicenter cohort study. Surg Endosc 27:494–500CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Wassenaar EB, Schoenmaeckers EJ, Raymakers JT, Rakic S (2010) Subsequent abdominal surgery after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. Hernia 14:137–142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wassenaar EB, Schoenmaeckers EJ, Raymakers JT, Rakic S (2010) Subsequent abdominal surgery after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. Hernia 14:137–142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Bleichrodt RP, Simmermacher RK, van der Lei B, Schakenraad JM (1993) Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch versus polypropylene mesh for the repair of contaminated defects of the abdominal wall. Surg Gynecol Obstet 176:18–24PubMed Bleichrodt RP, Simmermacher RK, van der Lei B, Schakenraad JM (1993) Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch versus polypropylene mesh for the repair of contaminated defects of the abdominal wall. Surg Gynecol Obstet 176:18–24PubMed
11.
go back to reference Kasperk R, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2000) The repair of large parastomal hernias using a midline approach and a prosthetic mesh in the sublay position. Am J Surg 179:186–188CrossRefPubMed Kasperk R, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2000) The repair of large parastomal hernias using a midline approach and a prosthetic mesh in the sublay position. Am J Surg 179:186–188CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Slater NJ, Hansson BM, Buyne OR, Hendriks T, Bleichrodt RP (2011) Repair of parastomal hernias with biologic grafts: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1252–1258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Slater NJ, Hansson BM, Buyne OR, Hendriks T, Bleichrodt RP (2011) Repair of parastomal hernias with biologic grafts: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1252–1258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg 238:391–399 (discussion 399–400) PubMedPubMedCentral Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg 238:391–399 (discussion 399–400) PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Asif A, Ruiz M, Yetasook A, Denham W, Linn J, Carbray J, Ujiki M (2012) Laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique results in superior recurrence rate. Surg Endosc 26:3430–3434CrossRefPubMed Asif A, Ruiz M, Yetasook A, Denham W, Linn J, Carbray J, Ujiki M (2012) Laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique results in superior recurrence rate. Surg Endosc 26:3430–3434CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hoturas A, Murphy J, Thaha M, Chan CL (2013) The persistent challenge of parastomal herniation: a review of the literature and future developments. Colorectal Dis 15:e202–e214CrossRef Hoturas A, Murphy J, Thaha M, Chan CL (2013) The persistent challenge of parastomal herniation: a review of the literature and future developments. Colorectal Dis 15:e202–e214CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: No different than a laparoscopic ventral hernia repair?
Authors
Salomon Levy
Margaret A. Plymale
Michael T. Miller
Daniel L. Davenport
John Scott Roth
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4370-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2016 Go to the issue