Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2010

01-03-2010

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Are ten cases per year enough to reach the quality standards? A report from a single small-volume transplant center

Authors: S. Saad, A. Paul, J. Treckmann, A. Tarabichi, M. Nagelschmidt, W. Arns

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy is the preferred method of kidney donation in high-volume US transplant centers, but for small transplant programs the question of the minimal case load per year necessary to reach the quality standards is open.

Patients and methods

From 1996 to 2007 we performed 130 live kidney donations including 93 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies followed by transplantation in a community hospital with an average case load of 10 laparoscopic cases per year. We compared the results after 37 open and 93 laparoscopic live donor operations with respect to operating time, conversion rate, complications, and recipients’ outcome.

Results

There were no significant differences in terms of safe outcome of donor patients after open or laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. The mean operating time was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) in the open group (125 min, OG) than in the laparoscopic group (150 min, LG). Mean hospital stay was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) in LG (6.8 days) versus OG (9.7 days). The conversion rate was 3.2% in the LG. Postoperative complication of donors consisted of temporary nerve irritation (two patients) and retroperitoneal hematoma (one patient) in the LG, and wound infection followed by hernia formation (one patient) and ileus 1 year after organ donation (one patient) in the OG. Safe outcome of the recipients after open (RaOD) or laparoscopic donation (RaLD) was similar. Uneventful transplantation occurred in 94.6% of the RaOD and in 92.5% of the RaLD. One kidney was lost due to renal vein thrombosis (RaLD). Mean postoperative creatinine after 4 weeks showed no difference between RaOD (1.6 mg/dl) and RaLD (1.7 mg/dl).

Conclusion

Approximately ten cases per year may be enough to ensure safety and quality of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS et al (1995) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60:1047–1049PubMed Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS et al (1995) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60:1047–1049PubMed
2.
go back to reference Handschin AE, Weber M, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2003) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg 90:1323–1332CrossRefPubMed Handschin AE, Weber M, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2003) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg 90:1323–1332CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bemelman WA, van Doorn RC, de Wit LT, Kox C, Surachno J et al (2001) Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ascending the learning curve. Surg Endosc 15:442–444CrossRefPubMed Bemelman WA, van Doorn RC, de Wit LT, Kox C, Surachno J et al (2001) Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ascending the learning curve. Surg Endosc 15:442–444CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Buell JF, Lee L, Martin JE, Dake NA, Cavanaugh TM et al (2005) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs. open live donor nephrectomy: a quality of life and functional study. Clin Transplant 19:102–109CrossRefPubMed Buell JF, Lee L, Martin JE, Dake NA, Cavanaugh TM et al (2005) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs. open live donor nephrectomy: a quality of life and functional study. Clin Transplant 19:102–109CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kok NF, Alwayn IP, Lind MY, Tran KT, Weimar W et al (2006) Donor nephrectomy: mini-incision muscle-splitting open approach versus laparoscopy. Transplantation 81:881–887CrossRefPubMed Kok NF, Alwayn IP, Lind MY, Tran KT, Weimar W et al (2006) Donor nephrectomy: mini-incision muscle-splitting open approach versus laparoscopy. Transplantation 81:881–887CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Schulam PG, Bender JS, Magnuson TH et al (1997) Comparison of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy versus the standard open approach. Transplant Proc 29:138–139CrossRefPubMed Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Schulam PG, Bender JS, Magnuson TH et al (1997) Comparison of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy versus the standard open approach. Transplant Proc 29:138–139CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chin EH, Hazzan D, Herron DM, Gaetano JN et al (2007) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy—intraoperative safety, immediate morbidity and delayed complications with 500 cases. Surg Endosc 21:521–526CrossRefPubMed Chin EH, Hazzan D, Herron DM, Gaetano JN et al (2007) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy—intraoperative safety, immediate morbidity and delayed complications with 500 cases. Surg Endosc 21:521–526CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sundaram CP, Martin GL, Guise A, Bernie J et al (2007) Complications after a 5-year experience with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the Indiana University Experience. Surg Endosc 21:724–728CrossRefPubMed Sundaram CP, Martin GL, Guise A, Bernie J et al (2007) Complications after a 5-year experience with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the Indiana University Experience. Surg Endosc 21:724–728CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Duchene DA, Johnson DB, Li S, Roden JS et al (2003) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at a low volume living donor transplant center: successful outcomes can be expected. J Urol 170:731–733CrossRefPubMed Duchene DA, Johnson DB, Li S, Roden JS et al (2003) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at a low volume living donor transplant center: successful outcomes can be expected. J Urol 170:731–733CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dalla Valle R, Mazzoni MP, Capocasale E, Bisi N et al (2006) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: short learning curve. Transplant Proc 38:1001–1733CrossRefPubMed Dalla Valle R, Mazzoni MP, Capocasale E, Bisi N et al (2006) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: short learning curve. Transplant Proc 38:1001–1733CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, Morton A, Rosenberger WF et al (1997) Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 226:483–489; discussion 489–490CrossRefPubMed Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, Morton A, Rosenberger WF et al (1997) Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 226:483–489; discussion 489–490CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Chavin KD, Montgomery R (1998) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: technical considerations and allograft vascular length. Transplantation 65:1657–1658CrossRefPubMed Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Chavin KD, Montgomery R (1998) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: technical considerations and allograft vascular length. Transplantation 65:1657–1658CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference El-Galley R, Hood N, Young CJ, Deierhoi M, Urban DA (2004) Donor nephrectomy: a comparison of techniques and results of open, hand assisted and full laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 171:40–43CrossRefPubMed El-Galley R, Hood N, Young CJ, Deierhoi M, Urban DA (2004) Donor nephrectomy: a comparison of techniques and results of open, hand assisted and full laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 171:40–43CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Su LM, Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Jarrett TW, Trock BJ et al (2004) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 240:358–363CrossRefPubMed Su LM, Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Jarrett TW, Trock BJ et al (2004) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 240:358–363CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Giessing M, Deger S, Ebeling V, Roigas J, Turk I et al (2003) Laparoscopic transperitoneal donor nephrectomy. Technique and results. Urologe A 42:218–224PubMed Giessing M, Deger S, Ebeling V, Roigas J, Turk I et al (2003) Laparoscopic transperitoneal donor nephrectomy. Technique and results. Urologe A 42:218–224PubMed
16.
go back to reference Kuo P, Johnson LB (2000) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy increases the supply of living donor kidneys: a center-specific microeconomic analysis. Transplantation 69:2211–2213CrossRefPubMed Kuo P, Johnson LB (2000) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy increases the supply of living donor kidneys: a center-specific microeconomic analysis. Transplantation 69:2211–2213CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kok NF, Lind MY, Hansson BM, Pilzecker D, Mertens zur Borg IR et al (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. Br Med J 333:221CrossRef Kok NF, Lind MY, Hansson BM, Pilzecker D, Mertens zur Borg IR et al (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. Br Med J 333:221CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Baron PW, Baldwin DD, Hadley HR, Ojogho ON, Ruckle HC et al (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is safe and results in increased kidney donation. Am Surg 70:901–905PubMed Baron PW, Baldwin DD, Hadley HR, Ojogho ON, Ruckle HC et al (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is safe and results in increased kidney donation. Am Surg 70:901–905PubMed
19.
go back to reference Buell JF, Hanaway MJ, Potter SR, Cronin DC, Yoshida A et al (2002) Hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy as an alternative to traditional laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Am J Transplant 2:983–988CrossRefPubMed Buell JF, Hanaway MJ, Potter SR, Cronin DC, Yoshida A et al (2002) Hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy as an alternative to traditional laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Am J Transplant 2:983–988CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lai IR, Tsai MK, Lee PH (2004) Hand-assisted versus total laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Formos Med Assoc 103:749–753PubMed Lai IR, Tsai MK, Lee PH (2004) Hand-assisted versus total laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Formos Med Assoc 103:749–753PubMed
21.
go back to reference Rassweiler JJ, Wiesel M, Carl S, Drehmer I, Jurgowski W et al (2001) Laparoscopic liver donor nephrectomy. Personal experiences and review of the literature. Urologe A40:485–492 Rassweiler JJ, Wiesel M, Carl S, Drehmer I, Jurgowski W et al (2001) Laparoscopic liver donor nephrectomy. Personal experiences and review of the literature. Urologe A40:485–492
22.
go back to reference Lewis GR, Brook NR, Waller JR, Bains JC, Veitch PS et al (2004) A comparison of traditional open, minimal-incision donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int 17:589–595CrossRefPubMed Lewis GR, Brook NR, Waller JR, Bains JC, Veitch PS et al (2004) A comparison of traditional open, minimal-incision donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int 17:589–595CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Tan HP, Shapiro R, Montgomery RA, Ratner LE (2006) Proposed live donor nephrectomy complication classification scheme. Transplantation 81:1221–1223CrossRefPubMed Tan HP, Shapiro R, Montgomery RA, Ratner LE (2006) Proposed live donor nephrectomy complication classification scheme. Transplantation 81:1221–1223CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMed Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Nanidis TG, Antcliffe D, Kokkinos C et al (2008) Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 247:58–70CrossRefPubMed Nanidis TG, Antcliffe D, Kokkinos C et al (2008) Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 247:58–70CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Are ten cases per year enough to reach the quality standards? A report from a single small-volume transplant center
Authors
S. Saad
A. Paul
J. Treckmann
A. Tarabichi
M. Nagelschmidt
W. Arns
Publication date
01-03-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0642-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2010 Go to the issue

News and notices

News and Notices