Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery 4/2010

01-08-2010 | Original Article

Laparoscopic Colonic Resection for Rectosigmoid Colonic Tumours: A Retrospective Analysis and Comparison with Open Resection

Authors: Kurumboor Prakash, Deepak Varma, Mahendra Rajan, Naduthottam Palanisamy Kamlesh, Prakash Zacharias, Ramesh Ganesh Narayanan, Mathew Philip

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Laparoscopic approach for treatment of colorectal malignancy is gaining acceptance gradually; however the benefits of laparoscopic surgery in colonic and rectal tumours is still open to debate. This study aims at a retrospective analysis of operative and short term outcome of patients with rectosigmoid tumours. A retrospective analysis of operative, postoperative and short-term outcome of 62 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer of rectosigmoid region were compared with a same number of parameters-matched patients who underwent open colorectal resection. Blood transfusion requirement was significantly more in the open group compared to the laparoscopy group (38.7% versus 6.4%, p = 0.001). ICU stay was less in the laparoscopy group (p = <0.05) and they were started on oral liquid diet earlier (p = 0.013). The number of the lymph nodes retrieved, positive distal margin and radial involvement were similar in both groups. The hospital stay was significantly shorter in laparoscopy group (8.4 versus 13.8 days, p < 0.05). Radical operation for rectosigmoid tumors is technically feasible with laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic approach is associated with less blood loss, transfusion and significantly less ICU stay. Laparoscopic group recovers early and needs less hospital stay
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed
2.
go back to reference Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF (1994) Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy [letter]. Lancet 344:58PubMedCrossRef Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF (1994) Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy [letter]. Lancet 344:58PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA et al (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187:46–54PubMedCrossRef Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA et al (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187:46–54PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A et al (2005) Laparoscopic vs.open colectomy in cancer patients: long term complications, quality of life, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 48(12):2217–2223PubMedCrossRef Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A et al (2005) Laparoscopic vs.open colectomy in cancer patients: long term complications, quality of life, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 48(12):2217–2223PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference COST Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef COST Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer HJ. Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD003432. doi:10.1002/14651858. Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer HJ. Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD003432. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.
8.
go back to reference Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44:217–222PubMedCrossRef Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44:217–222PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Shah PR, Joseph A, Haray PN (2005) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: learning curve and training implications. Postgrad Med J 81:537–540PubMedCrossRef Shah PR, Joseph A, Haray PN (2005) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: learning curve and training implications. Postgrad Med J 81:537–540PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Guillou PJ Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRef Guillou PJ Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 363(9416):1187–1192PubMedCrossRef Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 363(9416):1187–1192PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y et al (2004) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 18(8):1211–1215PubMedCrossRef Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y et al (2004) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 18(8):1211–1215PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Araujo SE, da Silva eSousa AH Jr, de Campos FG et al (2003) Conventional approach x laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: results of a prospective randomized trial. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 58(3):133–140PubMedCrossRef Araujo SE, da Silva eSousa AH Jr, de Campos FG et al (2003) Conventional approach x laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: results of a prospective randomized trial. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 58(3):133–140PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC trial group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC trial group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E et al (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST study group trial. Ann Surg 246(4):655–662PubMedCrossRef Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E et al (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST study group trial. Ann Surg 246(4):655–662PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H et al (2007) Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a metaanalysis. Arch Surg 142:298–303PubMedCrossRef Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H et al (2007) Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a metaanalysis. Arch Surg 142:298–303PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic Colonic Resection for Rectosigmoid Colonic Tumours: A Retrospective Analysis and Comparison with Open Resection
Authors
Kurumboor Prakash
Deepak Varma
Mahendra Rajan
Naduthottam Palanisamy Kamlesh
Prakash Zacharias
Ramesh Ganesh Narayanan
Mathew Philip
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0972-2068
Electronic ISSN: 0973-9793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-010-0119-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Indian Journal of Surgery 4/2010 Go to the issue