Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2012

01-02-2012

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after a quarter century: why do we still convert?

Authors: Balazs I. Lengyel, Dan Azagury, Oliver Varban, Maria T. Panizales, Jill Steinberg, David C. Brooks, Stanley W. Ashley, Ali Tavakkolizadeh

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard procedure for gallbladder removal. However, conversion to open surgery is sometimes needed. The factors underlying a surgeon’s decision to convert a laparoscopic case to an open case are complex and poorly understood. With decreasing experience in open cholecystectomy, this procedure is however no longer the “safe” alternative it once was. With such an impending paradigm shift, this study aimed to identify the main reasons for conversion and ultimately to develop guidelines to help reduce the conversion rates.

Methods

Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database and financial records, the authors retrospectively reviewed 1,193 cholecystectomies performed at their institution from 2002 to 2009 and identified 70 conversions. Two independent surgeons reviewed the operative notes and determined the reasons for conversion. The number of ports at the time and the extent of dissection before conversion were assessed and used to create new conversion categories. Hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day complications, operative times and charges, and hospital charges were compared between the new groups.

Results

In 91% of conversion cases, the conversion was elective. In 49% of these conversions, the number of ports was fewer than four. According to the new conversion categories, most conversions were performed after minimal or no attempt at dissection. There were no differences in LOS, complications, operating room charges, or hospital charges between categories. Of the six emergent conversions (9%), bleeding and concern about common bile duct (CBD) injury were the main reasons. One CBD injury occurred.

Conclusions

In 49% of the cases, conversion was performed without a genuine attempt at laparoscopic dissection. Considering this new insight into the circumstances of conversion, the authors recommend that surgeons make a genuine effort at a laparoscopic approach, as reflected by placing four ports and trying to elevate the gallbladder before converting a case to an open approach.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Begos DG, Modlin IM (1994) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: from gimmick to gold standard. J Clin Gastroenterol 19:325–330PubMedCrossRef Begos DG, Modlin IM (1994) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: from gimmick to gold standard. J Clin Gastroenterol 19:325–330PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sain AH (1996) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current “gold standard” for the treatment of gallstone disease. Ann Surg 224:689–690PubMedCrossRef Sain AH (1996) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current “gold standard” for the treatment of gallstone disease. Ann Surg 224:689–690PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Livingston EH, Rege RV (2004) A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 188:205–211PubMedCrossRef Livingston EH, Rege RV (2004) A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 188:205–211PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kaafarani HM, Smith TS, Neumayer L, Berger DH, Depalma RG, Itani KM (2010) Trends, outcomes, and predictors of open and conversion to open cholecystectomy in Veterans Health Administration hospitals. Am J Surg 200:32–40PubMedCrossRef Kaafarani HM, Smith TS, Neumayer L, Berger DH, Depalma RG, Itani KM (2010) Trends, outcomes, and predictors of open and conversion to open cholecystectomy in Veterans Health Administration hospitals. Am J Surg 200:32–40PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lichten JB, Reid JJ, Zahalsky MP, Friedman RL (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the new millennium. Surg Endosc 15:867–872PubMedCrossRef Lichten JB, Reid JJ, Zahalsky MP, Friedman RL (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the new millennium. Surg Endosc 15:867–872PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Low SW, Iyer SG, Chang SK, Mak KS, Lee VT, Madhavan K (2009) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: safe implementation of successful strategies to reduce conversion rates. Surg Endosc 23:2424–2429PubMedCrossRef Low SW, Iyer SG, Chang SK, Mak KS, Lee VT, Madhavan K (2009) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: safe implementation of successful strategies to reduce conversion rates. Surg Endosc 23:2424–2429PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tang B, Cuschieri A (2006) Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1081–1091PubMedCrossRef Tang B, Cuschieri A (2006) Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1081–1091PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ballal M, David G, Willmott S, Corless DJ, Deakin M, Slavin JP (2009) Conversion after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England. Surg Endosc 23:2338–2344PubMedCrossRef Ballal M, David G, Willmott S, Corless DJ, Deakin M, Slavin JP (2009) Conversion after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England. Surg Endosc 23:2338–2344PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wolf AS, Nijsse BA, Sokal SM, Chang Y, Berger DL (2009) Surgical outcomes of open cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg 197:781–784PubMedCrossRef Wolf AS, Nijsse BA, Sokal SM, Chang Y, Berger DL (2009) Surgical outcomes of open cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg 197:781–784PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wiseman JT, Sharuk MN, Singla A, Cahan M, Litwin DE, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2011) Surgical management of acute cholecystitis at a tertiary care center in the modern era. Arch Surg 145:439–444 Wiseman JT, Sharuk MN, Singla A, Cahan M, Litwin DE, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2011) Surgical management of acute cholecystitis at a tertiary care center in the modern era. Arch Surg 145:439–444
11.
go back to reference Harboe KM, Bardram L (2011) The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark: outcome and risk factors for 20,307 patients from the national database. Surg Endosc 25:1630–1641PubMedCrossRef Harboe KM, Bardram L (2011) The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark: outcome and risk factors for 20,307 patients from the national database. Surg Endosc 25:1630–1641PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lengyel B, Panizales MT, Steinberg J, Ashley SW, Tavakkolizadeh A (2011) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: what is the price of conversion? Surgery (in press) Lengyel B, Panizales MT, Steinberg J, Ashley SW, Tavakkolizadeh A (2011) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: what is the price of conversion? Surgery (in press)
13.
go back to reference Low A, Decker D, Kania U, Hirner A (1997) Forensic aspects of complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Chirurg 68:395–402PubMedCrossRef Low A, Decker D, Kania U, Hirner A (1997) Forensic aspects of complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Chirurg 68:395–402PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zhang WJ, Li JM, Wu GZ, Luo KL, Dong ZT (2008) Risk factors affecting conversion in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ANZ J Surg 78:973–976PubMedCrossRef Zhang WJ, Li JM, Wu GZ, Luo KL, Dong ZT (2008) Risk factors affecting conversion in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ANZ J Surg 78:973–976PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jenkins PJ, Paterson HM, Parks RW, Garden OJ (2007) Open cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era. Br J Surg 94:1382–1385PubMedCrossRef Jenkins PJ, Paterson HM, Parks RW, Garden OJ (2007) Open cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era. Br J Surg 94:1382–1385PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Stiernstam M, Westman B, Lundell L (2005) Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 92:44–49PubMedCrossRef Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Stiernstam M, Westman B, Lundell L (2005) Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 92:44–49PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Alponat A, Kum CK, Koh BC, Rajnakova A, Goh PM (1997) Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 21:629–633PubMedCrossRef Alponat A, Kum CK, Koh BC, Rajnakova A, Goh PM (1997) Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 21:629–633PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL, Lai EC, Wong J (1997) Early decision for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 173:513–517PubMedCrossRef Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL, Lai EC, Wong J (1997) Early decision for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 173:513–517PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Chung RS, Ahmed N (2010) The impact of minimally invasive surgery on residents’ open operative experience: analysis of two decades of national data. Ann Surg 251:205–212PubMedCrossRef Chung RS, Ahmed N (2010) The impact of minimally invasive surgery on residents’ open operative experience: analysis of two decades of national data. Ann Surg 251:205–212PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chung R, Pham Q, Wojtasik L, Chari V, Chen P (2003) The laparoscopic experience of surgical graduates in the United States. Surg Endosc 17:1792–1795PubMedCrossRef Chung R, Pham Q, Wojtasik L, Chari V, Chen P (2003) The laparoscopic experience of surgical graduates in the United States. Surg Endosc 17:1792–1795PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schulman CI, Levi J, Sleeman D, Dunkin B, Irvin G, Levi D, Spector S, Franceschi D, Livingstone A (2007) Are we training our residents to perform open gallbladder and common bile duct operations? J Surg Res 142:246–249PubMedCrossRef Schulman CI, Levi J, Sleeman D, Dunkin B, Irvin G, Levi D, Spector S, Franceschi D, Livingstone A (2007) Are we training our residents to perform open gallbladder and common bile duct operations? J Surg Res 142:246–249PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after a quarter century: why do we still convert?
Authors
Balazs I. Lengyel
Dan Azagury
Oliver Varban
Maria T. Panizales
Jill Steinberg
David C. Brooks
Stanley W. Ashley
Ali Tavakkolizadeh
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1909-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2012 Go to the issue