Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2011

01-06-2011 | Letter-Reply

Laparoscopic bile duct exploration seems to be safe in higher-risk patients compared to endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, in a high-volume centre

Authors: H. Noble, E. Whitley, S. Norton, M. Thompson

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Excerpt

We thank the authors [1] for their comments regarding our study [2]. We have indeed gone some way to show that bile duct exploration appears to be as safe as and more efficient than the two-stage alternative approach of endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in higher-risk patients fit enough to undergo surgery [3]. However, we recently presented some data at the AUGIS annual meeting that does suggest that there is a more profound reduction in postoperative pulmonary function in higher-risk patients following laparoscopic bile duct exploration than after laparoscopic cholecystectomy alone [4]. One might conclude, therefore, that higher-risk patients with significant lung disease might best be treated by sphincterotomy. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kilambi R, Bansal VK, Misra MC (2010) A study of preoperative factors associated with a poor outcome following laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1438-7 Kilambi R, Bansal VK, Misra MC (2010) A study of preoperative factors associated with a poor outcome following laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-010-1438-7
2.
go back to reference Noble H, Whitley E, Norton S, Thompson M (2011) A study of preoperative factors associated with a poor outcome following laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 25:130–139PubMedCrossRef Noble H, Whitley E, Norton S, Thompson M (2011) A study of preoperative factors associated with a poor outcome following laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 25:130–139PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Noble H, Tranter S, Chesworth T, Norton S, Thompson M (2009) A randomised, clinical trial to compare endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with primary laparoscopic bile duct exploration during cholecystectomy in higher risk patients with choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19(6):713–720PubMedCrossRef Noble H, Tranter S, Chesworth T, Norton S, Thompson M (2009) A randomised, clinical trial to compare endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with primary laparoscopic bile duct exploration during cholecystectomy in higher risk patients with choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19(6):713–720PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Noble H, Barry J, Skyrme-Jones A, Norton SA, Thompson MH (2010) The cardio-pulmonary and inflammatory effects of laparoscopic and endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones in higher risk patients. BJS 97(5):42–43 Noble H, Barry J, Skyrme-Jones A, Norton SA, Thompson MH (2010) The cardio-pulmonary and inflammatory effects of laparoscopic and endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones in higher risk patients. BJS 97(5):42–43
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic bile duct exploration seems to be safe in higher-risk patients compared to endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, in a high-volume centre
Authors
H. Noble
E. Whitley
S. Norton
M. Thompson
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1577-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2011 Go to the issue