Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2008

01-09-2008 | Technique

Laparoscopic appendectomy without clip or ligature. An experimental study

Authors: Adnan Aslan, Cagdas Karaveli, Ozlem Elpek

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 9/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We aimed to test the efficacy and safety of closure of the appendeceal stump with only laparoscopic bipolar electrocautery in rats.

Methods

In this study, 40 female Wistar-Albino rats were used. In group I (n = 10), appendix vermiformis, approximately 1 cm in width, was completely ligated with 3/0 silk suture close to cecum, and removed. In group II (n = 20) and group III (n = 10), the appendeceal stump was coagulated by bipolar cautery. The coagulation of 70 mA took 10 s, and was repeated one more time. The stump was divided, and checked to ensure complete occlusion. Groups I and II underwent relaparotomy at 15 days, cecum was taken out, and the burst pressure of the stump was measured. Group III did not undergo relaparotomy; the burst pressure was measured during the first laparotomy.

Results

All rats survived. At relaparotomy, no intra-abdominal complications were detected, including intestinal obstruction, abscess, and leakage. Omentum and fatty tissue of uterus was adhered to the appendix stump in group I, but only fatty tissue of uterus was adhered on the stump in group II. Although the intracecal pressure reached 30 cmH2O, at which pressure the cecum was highly stretched, ligated (group I) or coagulated (group II) stumps did not burst or opened. In group III, the burst or opening pressure of the stump (11.2 ± 2.7 cmH2O) was significantly lower than in groups I and II (p < 0.001). Of group II rats, 80% had complete epithelial regeneration at the coagulated stump sites in contrast to ligated rats (p < 0.001) with severe inflammatory changes, abscess, and necrosis.

Conclusions

At late course, coagulated stumps did not allow the leakage or burst, unlike ligated stumps. However, coagulation of the stump seemed to contribute more to epithelial healing. This experimental model suggests that the closure of the stump with only bipolar coagulation was a safe and feasible method.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Andersen BR, Kallehave FL, Andersen HK (2001) Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001439 Andersen BR, Kallehave FL, Andersen HK (2001) Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001439
2.
go back to reference Anderson KD, Parry RL (1998) Appendicitis. In: O’Neill JA, Rowe MI, Grosfeld JL, Fonkalsrud EW, Coran AG (eds). Pediatric Surgery, Mosby, St. Louis, Missouri, pp 1369–1379 Anderson KD, Parry RL (1998) Appendicitis. In: O’Neill JA, Rowe MI, Grosfeld JL, Fonkalsrud EW, Coran AG (eds). Pediatric Surgery, Mosby, St. Louis, Missouri, pp 1369–1379
3.
go back to reference Bresciani C, Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Jacob CE, Ozaki A, Batagello C, Proscurshim I, Gama-Rodrigues J (2005) Laparoscopic versus standard appendectomy outcomes and cost comparisons in the private sector. J Gastrointest Surg 9:1174–1180PubMedCrossRef Bresciani C, Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Jacob CE, Ozaki A, Batagello C, Proscurshim I, Gama-Rodrigues J (2005) Laparoscopic versus standard appendectomy outcomes and cost comparisons in the private sector. J Gastrointest Surg 9:1174–1180PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J, Padbury RT, Wilson TG, Wattchow DA, Langcake M (1996) Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg 20:263–266 PubMedCrossRef Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J, Padbury RT, Wilson TG, Wattchow DA, Langcake M (1996) Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg 20:263–266 PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW, Custer MD 3rd, Harrison JB (1994) A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 219:725–728 PubMedCrossRef Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW, Custer MD 3rd, Harrison JB (1994) A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 219:725–728 PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kum CK, Ngoi SS, Goh PM, Tekant Y, Isaac JR (1993) Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Br J Surg 80:1599–1600 PubMedCrossRef Kum CK, Ngoi SS, Goh PM, Tekant Y, Isaac JR (1993) Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Br J Surg 80:1599–1600 PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tate JJ, Dawson JW, Chung SC, Lau WY, Li AK (1993) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Prospective randomized trial. Lancet 342:633–637 PubMedCrossRef Tate JJ, Dawson JW, Chung SC, Lau WY, Li AK (1993) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Prospective randomized trial. Lancet 342:633–637 PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cothren CC, Moore EE, Johnson JL, Moore JB, Ciesla DJ, Burch JM (2005) Can we afford to do laparoscopic appendectomy in an academic hospital? Am J Surg 190:950–954PubMed Cothren CC, Moore EE, Johnson JL, Moore JB, Ciesla DJ, Burch JM (2005) Can we afford to do laparoscopic appendectomy in an academic hospital? Am J Surg 190:950–954PubMed
9.
go back to reference Valioulis I, Hameury F, Dahmani L, Levard G (2001) Laparoscope-assisted appendectomy in children: the two-trocar technique. Eur J Pediatr Surg 11:391–394PubMedCrossRef Valioulis I, Hameury F, Dahmani L, Levard G (2001) Laparoscope-assisted appendectomy in children: the two-trocar technique. Eur J Pediatr Surg 11:391–394PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ng WT, Lee YK, Hui SK, Sze YS, Chan J, Zeng AG, Wong CH, Wong WH (2004)An optimal, cost-effective laparoscopic appendectomy technique for our surgical residents. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14:125–129PubMedCrossRef Ng WT, Lee YK, Hui SK, Sze YS, Chan J, Zeng AG, Wong CH, Wong WH (2004)An optimal, cost-effective laparoscopic appendectomy technique for our surgical residents. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14:125–129PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cristalli BG, Izard V, Jacob D, Levardon M (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy using a clip applier. Surg Endosc 5:176–178PubMedCrossRef Cristalli BG, Izard V, Jacob D, Levardon M (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy using a clip applier. Surg Endosc 5:176–178PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Klima S (1998) Importance of appendix stump management in laparoscopic appendectomy. Zentralbl Chir 123:90–93PubMed Klima S (1998) Importance of appendix stump management in laparoscopic appendectomy. Zentralbl Chir 123:90–93PubMed
13.
go back to reference Khanna S, Khurana S, Vij S (2004) No clip, no ligature laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14:201–203PubMedCrossRef Khanna S, Khurana S, Vij S (2004) No clip, no ligature laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14:201–203PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Koontz CS, Smith LA, Burkholder HC, Higdon K, Aderhold R, Carr M (2006) Video-assisted transumbilical appendectomy in children. J Pediatr Surg 41:710–712PubMedCrossRef Koontz CS, Smith LA, Burkholder HC, Higdon K, Aderhold R, Carr M (2006) Video-assisted transumbilical appendectomy in children. J Pediatr Surg 41:710–712PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169:208–212 Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169:208–212
16.
go back to reference Huwart L, El Khoury M, Lesavre A, Phan C, Rangheard AS, Bessoud B, Menu Y (2007) What is the thickness of the normal appendix on MDCT? J Radiol 88:385–389PubMedCrossRef Huwart L, El Khoury M, Lesavre A, Phan C, Rangheard AS, Bessoud B, Menu Y (2007) What is the thickness of the normal appendix on MDCT? J Radiol 88:385–389PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wiersma F, Sramek A, Holscher HC (2005) US features of the normal appendix and surrounding area in children. Radiology 235:1018–1022PubMedCrossRef Wiersma F, Sramek A, Holscher HC (2005) US features of the normal appendix and surrounding area in children. Radiology 235:1018–1022PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Yoshida H, Onda M, Tajiri T, Mamada Y, Taniai N, Koizumi M, Yoshimura K, Takasaki H, Furukawa K (2002) Ultrasonography of non-perforated appendicitis in young children. Hepatogastroenterology 49:1293–1295PubMed Yoshida H, Onda M, Tajiri T, Mamada Y, Taniai N, Koizumi M, Yoshimura K, Takasaki H, Furukawa K (2002) Ultrasonography of non-perforated appendicitis in young children. Hepatogastroenterology 49:1293–1295PubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic appendectomy without clip or ligature. An experimental study
Authors
Adnan Aslan
Cagdas Karaveli
Ozlem Elpek
Publication date
01-09-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 9/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9712-z

Other articles of this Issue 9/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2008 Go to the issue