Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 1/2017

01-03-2017 | Original Article

Laparoscopic appendectomy: Hem-o-lok versus Endoloop in stump closure

Authors: Andrea Lucchi, Pierluigi Berti, Michele Grassia, Luca Maria Siani, Carlo Gabbianelli, Gianluca Garulli

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

There are several techniques described to close the appendicular stump during laparoscopic appendectomy. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and usefulness of the Hem-o-lok clip for the closure of appendicular stump, comparing these data with those concerning the endo-loop. We conducted a retrospective study that compared two groups of patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from 2010 to 2015 at our institution. We used the Endoloop to close the stump in the first group (group I) and the Hem-o-lok in the second group (group II). We reviewed patient’s data including: complications, operative time, length of stay, costs. There were 121 patients in group I and 138 patients in group II. The mean operative times were 40.5 min in group I and 36.4 min in the group II. No intraoperative complications and no mortality were observed in either group. The mean postoperative length of hospital stay was similar for both groups. There was no rehospitalization after discharge. The complication rate did not reach statistical significance between the groups. The cost of the procedure using the Hem-o-lok has been lower than using the Endoloop. Both the Endoloop and Hem-o-lok are safe for the closure of the appendicular stump. Hem-o-lok appears to be superior than Endoloop in terms of easeness of use and cheapness, maintaining the same safety.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H et al (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239:43–52CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H et al (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239:43–52CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Mayir B, Ensari CÖ, Bilecik T, Aslaner A, Oruç MT (2015) Methods for closure of appendix stump during laparoscopic appendectomy procedure. Turk J Surg Ulusal Cerrahi Derg 31(4):229–231. doi:10.5152/UCD.2015.2768 Mayir B, Ensari CÖ, Bilecik T, Aslaner A, Oruç MT (2015) Methods for closure of appendix stump during laparoscopic appendectomy procedure. Turk J Surg Ulusal Cerrahi Derg 31(4):229–231. doi:10.​5152/​UCD.​2015.​2768
5.
go back to reference Partecke LI, Kessler W, Patrzyk M et al (2011) Comparison among different closure methods of the appendicular stump in laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Technol Int 21:85–91PubMed Partecke LI, Kessler W, Patrzyk M et al (2011) Comparison among different closure methods of the appendicular stump in laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Technol Int 21:85–91PubMed
6.
go back to reference Miyano G, Urao M, Lane GJ et al (2011) A prospective analysis of endoloops and endostaples for closing the stump of the appendix in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:177–179CrossRefPubMed Miyano G, Urao M, Lane GJ et al (2011) A prospective analysis of endoloops and endostaples for closing the stump of the appendix in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:177–179CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Delibegovic S, Matovic E (2009) Hem-o-lok plastic clips in securing of the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 23:2851–2854CrossRefPubMed Delibegovic S, Matovic E (2009) Hem-o-lok plastic clips in securing of the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 23:2851–2854CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Colak E, Kement M, Ozlem N et al (2013) A comparison of nonabsorbable polymeric clips and endoloop li- gatures for the closure of the appendicular stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, randomized study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:255–258CrossRefPubMed Colak E, Kement M, Ozlem N et al (2013) A comparison of nonabsorbable polymeric clips and endoloop li- gatures for the closure of the appendicular stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, randomized study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:255–258CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6(10):CD001546 Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6(10):CD001546
10.
go back to reference Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH et al (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169:208–212CrossRefPubMed Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH et al (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169:208–212CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wei B, Qi CL, Chen TF, Zheng ZH et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 25:1199–1208CrossRefPubMed Wei B, Qi CL, Chen TF, Zheng ZH et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 25:1199–1208CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Schreiber JH (1987) Early experience with laparoscopic appendectomy in women. Surg Endosc 1:211–216CrossRefPubMed Schreiber JH (1987) Early experience with laparoscopic appendectomy in women. Surg Endosc 1:211–216CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Schick KS, Huttl TP, Fertmann JM et al (2008) A critical analysis of laparoscopic appendectomy: how experience with 1,400 appendectomies allowed innovative treatment to become standard in a university hospital. World J Surg 32:1406–1413CrossRefPubMed Schick KS, Huttl TP, Fertmann JM et al (2008) A critical analysis of laparoscopic appendectomy: how experience with 1,400 appendectomies allowed innovative treatment to become standard in a university hospital. World J Surg 32:1406–1413CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Matyja M, Strzałka M (2016) Rembiasz K laparosocopic appendectomy, cost-effectiveness of three different techniques used to close the appendix stump. Polish J Surg 87(12):634–637. doi:10.1515/pjs-2016-0015 Matyja M, Strzałka M (2016) Rembiasz K laparosocopic appendectomy, cost-effectiveness of three different techniques used to close the appendix stump. Polish J Surg 87(12):634–637. doi:10.​1515/​pjs-2016-0015
16.
go back to reference Vettoretto N, Montori G, Bartoli M, Giovanetti M (2012) Lesson learned from 10 years’ experience in laparoscopic appendectomy in a community hospital. Updates Surg 64:285–288CrossRefPubMed Vettoretto N, Montori G, Bartoli M, Giovanetti M (2012) Lesson learned from 10 years’ experience in laparoscopic appendectomy in a community hospital. Updates Surg 64:285–288CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Agresta F, Arezzo A, Allaix ME, Adolfo S, Anania G (2016) Current status of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the emergency setting. Updates Surg 68:47–52CrossRefPubMed Agresta F, Arezzo A, Allaix ME, Adolfo S, Anania G (2016) Current status of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the emergency setting. Updates Surg 68:47–52CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic appendectomy: Hem-o-lok versus Endoloop in stump closure
Authors
Andrea Lucchi
Pierluigi Berti
Michele Grassia
Luca Maria Siani
Carlo Gabbianelli
Gianluca Garulli
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0413-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Updates in Surgery 1/2017 Go to the issue