Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation 6/2004

01-06-2004 | Original Research Article

Lack of Interaction between Modified-Release Fluvastatin and Amlodipine in Healthy Subjects

Authors: Dr Pratapa P. Prasad, Daria Stypinski, Kunjbala H. Vyas, Leonard Gonasun

Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Issue 6/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the potential for a pharmacokinetic interaction between fluvastatin modified-release 80mg tablet (Lescol® XL; fluvastatin XL) and amlodipine 5mg tablet (Norvasc®) following multiple once-a-day doses for 2 weeks.
Design: This was a single-centre, six-sequence, three-period, randomised, crossover design study. Fluvastatin XL 80mg tablet and amlodipine 5mg tablet were administered once a day for 2 weeks either alone or in combination. Fluvastatin and amlodipine serum concentration profiles were characterised on day 14 for each treatment. The pharmacokinetic interaction between the two drugs was evaluated based on the p-values and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for log-transformed highest observed concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration-time curve calculated by the linear trapezoidal method up to 24 hours (AUC24), and apparent oral clearance at steady state (CL/F), using a single entity as the reference treatment and the combination as the test treatment. Adverse events (AEs), safety laboratory tests and physical examinations were evaluated for safety.
Study participants: Twenty-four healthy subjects were enrolled and 19 completed the study. The safety analysis was based on data from all 24 subjects who received at least one dose of a treatment, while the pharmacokinetic analysis was based on data from the 19 subjects who completed all treatments.
Results: The coadministration of fluvastatin XL and amlodipine resulted in no significant changes in the steady-state AUC (469 vs 454 μg · h/L), Cmax (96 vs 89 μg/L), and CL/F (197 vs 232 L/h) of fluvastatin when compared with fluvastatin XL alone. The p-values for these comparisons were between 0.172 and 0.238, and the 90% CIs for the geometric means were within 78% and 139%. A similar comparison for amlodipine showed no significant difference in the steady-state AUC (132 vs 140 μg· h/L), Cmax (7.1 vs 7.5 μg/L) and CL/F (41 vs 40 L/h) of amlodipine. The p-values for these comparisons were between 0.309 and 0.353, and the 90% CIs for the geometric means were within 90% and 111%. The majority of the AEs were mild in severity. There were no clinically relevant changes in clinical laboratory results, physical examinations or vital sign parameters.
Conclusion: There were no significant differences in the steady-state pharmaco-kinetics of fluvastatin or amlodipine when they were administered together and the small differences observed were not clinically relevant. Therefore, no dose adjustment of either drug is necessary when fluvastatin and amlodipine are coadministered.
Footnotes
1
The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cupp MJ, Tracy TS. Cytochrome P450: new nomenclature and clinical implications. Am Fam Physician 1998; 57(1): 107–16PubMed Cupp MJ, Tracy TS. Cytochrome P450: new nomenclature and clinical implications. Am Fam Physician 1998; 57(1): 107–16PubMed
2.
go back to reference Benet LZ, Droetz DL, Sheiner LB. Pharmacokinetics: the dynamics of drug absorption, distribution, and elimination. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Molinoff PB, et al., editors. Goodman and Gilman’s The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 9th ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill, 1996: 3–29 Benet LZ, Droetz DL, Sheiner LB. Pharmacokinetics: the dynamics of drug absorption, distribution, and elimination. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Molinoff PB, et al., editors. Goodman and Gilman’s The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 9th ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill, 1996: 3–29
3.
go back to reference Slaughter RL, Edwards DJ. Recent advances: the cytochrome P450 enzymes. Ann Pharmacother 1995; 29: 619–24PubMed Slaughter RL, Edwards DJ. Recent advances: the cytochrome P450 enzymes. Ann Pharmacother 1995; 29: 619–24PubMed
4.
go back to reference Fisher V, Johanson L, Heitz F, et al. The 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor fluvastatin: effect on human cytochrome P-450 and implications for metabolic drug interactions. Drug Metab Dispos 1999; 27(3): 410–6 Fisher V, Johanson L, Heitz F, et al. The 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor fluvastatin: effect on human cytochrome P-450 and implications for metabolic drug interactions. Drug Metab Dispos 1999; 27(3): 410–6
5.
go back to reference Trilli LE, Kelley CL, Aspinall SL, et al. Potential interaction between warfarin and fluvastatin. Ann Pharmacother 1996; 30: 1399–402PubMed Trilli LE, Kelley CL, Aspinall SL, et al. Potential interaction between warfarin and fluvastatin. Ann Pharmacother 1996; 30: 1399–402PubMed
6.
go back to reference Kline SS, Harrell CC. Potential warfarin-fluvastatin interaction [letter]. Ann Pharmacother 1997; 31: 790PubMed Kline SS, Harrell CC. Potential warfarin-fluvastatin interaction [letter]. Ann Pharmacother 1997; 31: 790PubMed
7.
go back to reference Appel S, Rufenacht T, Kalafsky G, et al. Lack of interaction between fluvastatin and oral hypoglycemic agents in healthy subjects and in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 29A–32APubMedCrossRef Appel S, Rufenacht T, Kalafsky G, et al. Lack of interaction between fluvastatin and oral hypoglycemic agents in healthy subjects and in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 29A–32APubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Randomized, crossover study to examine the effect of pre-administration of rifampicin on fluvastatin pharmacokinetics. Novartis Internal Report of Protocol A202-E-000/001. 1992 Jan Randomized, crossover study to examine the effect of pre-administration of rifampicin on fluvastatin pharmacokinetics. Novartis Internal Report of Protocol A202-E-000/001. 1992 Jan
9.
go back to reference Prueksaritanont T, Ma B, Tang C, et al. Metabolic interactions between mibefradil and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: an in vitro investigation with human liver preparations. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 47: 291–8PubMedCrossRef Prueksaritanont T, Ma B, Tang C, et al. Metabolic interactions between mibefradil and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: an in vitro investigation with human liver preparations. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 47: 291–8PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Stopher DA, Beresford AP, Macrae PV, et al. The metabolism and pharmacokinetics of amlodipine in humans and animals. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1988; 12Suppl. 7: S55–9PubMedCrossRef Stopher DA, Beresford AP, Macrae PV, et al. The metabolism and pharmacokinetics of amlodipine in humans and animals. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1988; 12Suppl. 7: S55–9PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Beresford AP, McGibney D, Humphrey MJ, et al. Metabolism and kinetics of amlodipine in man. Xenobiotica 1988; 18(2): 245–54PubMedCrossRef Beresford AP, McGibney D, Humphrey MJ, et al. Metabolism and kinetics of amlodipine in man. Xenobiotica 1988; 18(2): 245–54PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Josefsson M, Zackrisson AL, Ahlner J. Effect of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of amlodipine in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1996; 51: 189–93PubMedCrossRef Josefsson M, Zackrisson AL, Ahlner J. Effect of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of amlodipine in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1996; 51: 189–93PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sasaki M, Maeda A, Fujimura A. Influence of diltiazem on the pharmacokinetics of amlodipine in elderly hypertensive patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 57: 85–6PubMedCrossRef Sasaki M, Maeda A, Fujimura A. Influence of diltiazem on the pharmacokinetics of amlodipine in elderly hypertensive patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 57: 85–6PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference US Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: in vivo drug metabolism/drug interaction studies-study design, data analysis, and recommendations for dosing and labelling, 1998 Nov US Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: in vivo drug metabolism/drug interaction studies-study design, data analysis, and recommendations for dosing and labelling, 1998 Nov
15.
go back to reference SAS Users’ Guide, Chapter 41, Version 8, 1999 SAS Users’ Guide, Chapter 41, Version 8, 1999
16.
go back to reference Westphal JF. Macrolide-induced clinically relevant drug interactions with cytochrome P-450A (CYP) 3A4: an update focused on clarithromycin, azithromycin and dirithromycin. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 50(4): 285–95PubMedCrossRef Westphal JF. Macrolide-induced clinically relevant drug interactions with cytochrome P-450A (CYP) 3A4: an update focused on clarithromycin, azithromycin and dirithromycin. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 50(4): 285–95PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Heinig R, Adelmann HG, Ahr G. The effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of nisoldipine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 55: 57–60PubMedCrossRef Heinig R, Adelmann HG, Ahr G. The effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of nisoldipine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 55: 57–60PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Neuvonen PJ, Jalava KM. Itraconazole drastically increases plasma concentrations of lovastatin and lovastatin acid. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1996; 60: 54–61PubMedCrossRef Neuvonen PJ, Jalava KM. Itraconazole drastically increases plasma concentrations of lovastatin and lovastatin acid. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1996; 60: 54–61PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Katoh M, Nakajima M, Shimada N, et al. Inhibition of human cytochrome P450 enzymes by 1,4-dihydropyridine calcium antagonists: prediction of in vivo drug-drug interactions. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 55(11-12): 843–52PubMedCrossRef Katoh M, Nakajima M, Shimada N, et al. Inhibition of human cytochrome P450 enzymes by 1,4-dihydropyridine calcium antagonists: prediction of in vivo drug-drug interactions. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 55(11-12): 843–52PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Physician Desk Reference, Thomson PDR at Montvale (NJ), USA. 2004 page 2275 Physician Desk Reference, Thomson PDR at Montvale (NJ), USA. 2004 page 2275
21.
go back to reference Meadowcroft AM, Williamson KM, Patterson JH, et al. The effects of fluvastatin, a CYP2C9 inhibitor, on losartan pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 39(4): 418–24PubMedCrossRef Meadowcroft AM, Williamson KM, Patterson JH, et al. The effects of fluvastatin, a CYP2C9 inhibitor, on losartan pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 39(4): 418–24PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kivistö KT, Kantola T, Neuvonen PJ. Different effects of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin and lovastatin. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 46: 49–53PubMedCrossRef Kivistö KT, Kantola T, Neuvonen PJ. Different effects of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin and lovastatin. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 46: 49–53PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Aberg J, Eriksson U, Fagger G. Effect of erythromycin on plasma fluvastatin levels: a pharmacokinetic study. Atherosclerosis 1997; 134: 118–9CrossRef Aberg J, Eriksson U, Fagger G. Effect of erythromycin on plasma fluvastatin levels: a pharmacokinetic study. Atherosclerosis 1997; 134: 118–9CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Lack of Interaction between Modified-Release Fluvastatin and Amlodipine in Healthy Subjects
Authors
Dr Pratapa P. Prasad
Daria Stypinski
Kunjbala H. Vyas
Leonard Gonasun
Publication date
01-06-2004
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Drug Investigation / Issue 6/2004
Print ISSN: 1173-2563
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200424060-00002

Other articles of this Issue 6/2004

Clinical Drug Investigation 6/2004 Go to the issue