Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2016

01-08-2016 | Dynamic Manuscript

Knotless choledochorraphy with barbed suture, safe and feasible

Authors: Luis C. Fernandez, Augusto Toriz, Jorge Hernandez, Norberto Sanchez, Erick Linares, Massiel Zenteno, Adolfo Cuendis, Jose Olivares, Gustavo Guerrero, Cesar F. Cervantes

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the safety and feasibility of a running continuous unidirectional barbed suture (V-Loc, Covidien, Mansfield, MA) for primary common bile duct closure while performing laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE).

Introduction

LCBDE is nowadays the best approach for treating complex common bile duct lithiasis or cases where the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has failed. It is clear that the primary closure of the common bile duct must be preferred over the T-tube drainage. The actual technical aspects offer room for improvement. We present our experience with barbed suture, for which recently, various fields of surgery have become interested in and which now has a series of studies that support it for several uses.

Methods

Between July 2012 and July 2014, 54 consecutive patients with bile duct stones underwent LCBDE by a single surgeon. Perioperative outcomes and 30-day complications were recorded.

Results

Upon the completion of the exploration, 50 patients had primary common bile duct closure using knotless unidirectional barbed 3-0 V-Loc 90 suture, and 4 patients were excluded. All of the sutures were performed without knot tying. The procedure in all patients was successfully performed with no intraoperative complications. There were no bile leaks in the 50 patients or other postoperative complications such as infection, need for reintervention or death.

Conclusion

The use of unidirectional knotless barbed suture (V-Loc 90) is safe, feasible and effective on LCBDE for primary common bile duct closure. The biliary leak rate is acceptably low and comparable to the rate reported in the literature. This report is our initial experience that needs further clinical trials.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sukharamwala P, Haq S, Amini B, Parikh N, Smith J, Ghani A, & DeVito P (2013) Primary choledochorrhaphy versus T-tube drainage for choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Surg J Resid Fellows 1(1):13–19 Sukharamwala P, Haq S, Amini B, Parikh N, Smith J, Ghani A, & DeVito P (2013) Primary choledochorrhaphy versus T-tube drainage for choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Surg J Resid Fellows 1(1):13–19
2.
3.
go back to reference Sheen-Cheng S-M, Chou F-F (1990) Choledochotomy for biliary lithiasis: is routine T-Tube drainage necessary? A prospective controlled trial. Acta Chir Scand 156:387–390 Sheen-Cheng S-M, Chou F-F (1990) Choledochotomy for biliary lithiasis: is routine T-Tube drainage necessary? A prospective controlled trial. Acta Chir Scand 156:387–390
4.
go back to reference Petelin JB, Lechleitner RA (1997) Laparoscopic choledochotomy without T-tube drainage is effective and safe. Abstract and Poster. SAGES Annual Scientific Session Petelin JB, Lechleitner RA (1997) Laparoscopic choledochotomy without T-tube drainage is effective and safe. Abstract and Poster. SAGES Annual Scientific Session
5.
go back to reference Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G (1998) Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 228(1):29–34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G (1998) Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 228(1):29–34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Croce E, Golia M, Azzola M et al (1996) Laparoscopic choledochotomy with primary closure: follow-up (5–44 months) of 31 patients. Surg Endosc 10(11):1064–1068CrossRefPubMed Croce E, Golia M, Azzola M et al (1996) Laparoscopic choledochotomy with primary closure: follow-up (5–44 months) of 31 patients. Surg Endosc 10(11):1064–1068CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Drouard F, Passone-Szerzyna N, Berthou JC (1997) Laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones. Hepatogastroenterology 44:16–21PubMed Drouard F, Passone-Szerzyna N, Berthou JC (1997) Laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones. Hepatogastroenterology 44:16–21PubMed
8.
go back to reference Millat B, Atger J, Deleuze A, Briandet H, Fingerhut A, Guillon F, Marrel E, DeSeguin C, Soulier P (1997) Laparoscopic treatment for choledocholithiasis: a prospective evaluation in 247 consecutive unselected patients. Hepatogastroenterology 44:28–34PubMed Millat B, Atger J, Deleuze A, Briandet H, Fingerhut A, Guillon F, Marrel E, DeSeguin C, Soulier P (1997) Laparoscopic treatment for choledocholithiasis: a prospective evaluation in 247 consecutive unselected patients. Hepatogastroenterology 44:28–34PubMed
9.
go back to reference Hanna GB, Frank TG, Cuschieri A (1997) Objective assessment of endoscopic knot quality. Am J Surg 174:410–413CrossRefPubMed Hanna GB, Frank TG, Cuschieri A (1997) Objective assessment of endoscopic knot quality. Am J Surg 174:410–413CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Joice P, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (1998) Ergonomic evaluation of laparoscopic bowel suturing. Am J Surg 176:373–378CrossRefPubMed Joice P, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (1998) Ergonomic evaluation of laparoscopic bowel suturing. Am J Surg 176:373–378CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mansberger AR, Jennings ER, Smith EP Jr, Yeager GH (1951) A new type pull-out wire for tendon surgery: a preliminary report. Bull Sch Med Univ MD 36(3):119–121PubMed Mansberger AR, Jennings ER, Smith EP Jr, Yeager GH (1951) A new type pull-out wire for tendon surgery: a preliminary report. Bull Sch Med Univ MD 36(3):119–121PubMed
12.
go back to reference Demyttenaere SV, Nau P, Henn M, Beck C, Zaruby J, Primavera M, Kirsch D, Miller J, Liu JJ, Bellizzi A, Melvin WS (2009) Barbed suture for gastrointestinal closure: a randomized control trial. Surg Innov 16:237–242CrossRefPubMed Demyttenaere SV, Nau P, Henn M, Beck C, Zaruby J, Primavera M, Kirsch D, Miller J, Liu JJ, Bellizzi A, Melvin WS (2009) Barbed suture for gastrointestinal closure: a randomized control trial. Surg Innov 16:237–242CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Milone M, Nicola M, Di-Minno M, Galloro G, Maietta P, Bianco P, Milone F, Musella M (2013) Safety and efficacy of barbed suture for gastrointestinal suture: a prospective and randomized study on obese patients undergoing gastric bypass. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(9):756–759CrossRefPubMed Milone M, Nicola M, Di-Minno M, Galloro G, Maietta P, Bianco P, Milone F, Musella M (2013) Safety and efficacy of barbed suture for gastrointestinal suture: a prospective and randomized study on obese patients undergoing gastric bypass. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(9):756–759CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Omotosho P, Yurcisin B, Ceppa E, Miller J, Kirsch D, Portenier DD (2011) In vivo assessment of an absorbable and non-absorbable knotless barbed suture for laparoscopic single-layer enterotomy closure: a clinical and biomechanical comparison against nonbarbed suture. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:893–897CrossRefPubMed Omotosho P, Yurcisin B, Ceppa E, Miller J, Kirsch D, Portenier DD (2011) In vivo assessment of an absorbable and non-absorbable knotless barbed suture for laparoscopic single-layer enterotomy closure: a clinical and biomechanical comparison against nonbarbed suture. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:893–897CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Facy O, De Blasi V, Goergen M, Arru L, De Magistris L et al (2013) Laparoscopic gastrointestinal anastomoses using knotless barbed sutures are safe and reproducible: a single-center experience with 201 patients. Surg Endosc 27:3841–3845CrossRefPubMed Facy O, De Blasi V, Goergen M, Arru L, De Magistris L et al (2013) Laparoscopic gastrointestinal anastomoses using knotless barbed sutures are safe and reproducible: a single-center experience with 201 patients. Surg Endosc 27:3841–3845CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference De Blasi V, Facy O, Goergen M et al (2013) Barbed versus usual suture for closure of the gastrojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic gastric bypass: a comparative trial. Obes Surg 23:60–63CrossRefPubMed De Blasi V, Facy O, Goergen M et al (2013) Barbed versus usual suture for closure of the gastrojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic gastric bypass: a comparative trial. Obes Surg 23:60–63CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
go back to reference Lyons C, Joseph R, Salas N, Reardon P, Bass B, Dunkin B (2012) Mesh fixation with a barbed anchor suture results in significantly less strangulation of the abdominal wall. Surg Endosc 26:1254–1257CrossRefPubMed Lyons C, Joseph R, Salas N, Reardon P, Bass B, Dunkin B (2012) Mesh fixation with a barbed anchor suture results in significantly less strangulation of the abdominal wall. Surg Endosc 26:1254–1257CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Nawfal K, Eisenstein D, Theoharis E, Dahlman M, Wegienka G (2012) Vaginal cuff closure during robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparing vicryl to barbed sutures. JSLS 16:525–529CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nawfal K, Eisenstein D, Theoharis E, Dahlman M, Wegienka G (2012) Vaginal cuff closure during robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparing vicryl to barbed sutures. JSLS 16:525–529CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Greenberg JA, Einarsson JI (2008) The use of bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(5):621–623CrossRefPubMed Greenberg JA, Einarsson JI (2008) The use of bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(5):621–623CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Angioli R, Plotti F, Montera R, Damiani P, Terranova C, Oronzi I, Luvero D, Scaletta G, Muzii L, Panici P (2012) A new type of absorbable barbed suture for use in laparoscopic myomectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 117(3):220–223CrossRefPubMed Angioli R, Plotti F, Montera R, Damiani P, Terranova C, Oronzi I, Luvero D, Scaletta G, Muzii L, Panici P (2012) A new type of absorbable barbed suture for use in laparoscopic myomectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 117(3):220–223CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Matsuhashi N, Takahashi T, Nonaka K, Tanahashi T, Imai H, Sasaki Y, Tanaka Y, Okumura N, Yamaguchi K, Osada S, Yoshida K (2013) Laparoscopic technique and safety experience with barbed suture closure for pelvic cavity after abdominoperineal resection. World J Surg Oncol 27(11):115CrossRef Matsuhashi N, Takahashi T, Nonaka K, Tanahashi T, Imai H, Sasaki Y, Tanaka Y, Okumura N, Yamaguchi K, Osada S, Yoshida K (2013) Laparoscopic technique and safety experience with barbed suture closure for pelvic cavity after abdominoperineal resection. World J Surg Oncol 27(11):115CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Jeon SH, Jung S, Son HS, Kimm SY, Chung BI (2013) The unidirectional barbed suture for renorrhaphy during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Stanford experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(6):521–525CrossRefPubMed Jeon SH, Jung S, Son HS, Kimm SY, Chung BI (2013) The unidirectional barbed suture for renorrhaphy during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Stanford experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(6):521–525CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Chapman S, Turo R, Cross W (2011) Vesicourethral anastomosis using V-Loc TM barbed suture during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Cent Eur J Urol 64(4):236CrossRef Chapman S, Turo R, Cross W (2011) Vesicourethral anastomosis using V-Loc TM barbed suture during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Cent Eur J Urol 64(4):236CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Zorn KC, Widmer H, Lattouf JB, Liberman D, Bhojani N, Trinh QD, Sun M, Karakiewicz PI, Denis R, El-Hakim A (2011) Novel method of knotless vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: feasibility study and early outcomes in 30 patients using the interlocked barbed unidirectional V-LOC 180 suture. Can Urol Assoc J 5(3):188–194CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zorn KC, Widmer H, Lattouf JB, Liberman D, Bhojani N, Trinh QD, Sun M, Karakiewicz PI, Denis R, El-Hakim A (2011) Novel method of knotless vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: feasibility study and early outcomes in 30 patients using the interlocked barbed unidirectional V-LOC 180 suture. Can Urol Assoc J 5(3):188–194CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Pham KN, Sack BS, O’Connor RC, Guralnick ML, Langenstroer P, See WA, Jacobsohn K (2013) V-Loc urethro-intestinal anastomosis during robotic cystectomy with orthotopic urinary diversion. Can Urol Assoc J 7(11–12):E663–E666PubMedPubMedCentral Pham KN, Sack BS, O’Connor RC, Guralnick ML, Langenstroer P, See WA, Jacobsohn K (2013) V-Loc urethro-intestinal anastomosis during robotic cystectomy with orthotopic urinary diversion. Can Urol Assoc J 7(11–12):E663–E666PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Sooriakumaran P, Slevin A, Grover S, Waldman O, Rajan S, Herman M, Berryhill R Jr, Leung R (2010) Use of a novel absorbable barbed plastic surgical suture enables a ‘‘Self-Cinching’’ technique of vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted prostatectomy and improves anastomotic times. J Endourol 24(10):1645–1650CrossRefPubMed Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Sooriakumaran P, Slevin A, Grover S, Waldman O, Rajan S, Herman M, Berryhill R Jr, Leung R (2010) Use of a novel absorbable barbed plastic surgical suture enables a ‘‘Self-Cinching’’ technique of vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted prostatectomy and improves anastomotic times. J Endourol 24(10):1645–1650CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L, Fan ST, Yokoyama Y, Crawford M, Makuuchi M, Christophi C, Banting S, Brooke-Smith M, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Nimura Y, Figueras J, DeMatteo RP, Büchler MW, Weitz J (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149(5):680–688CrossRefPubMed Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L, Fan ST, Yokoyama Y, Crawford M, Makuuchi M, Christophi C, Banting S, Brooke-Smith M, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Nimura Y, Figueras J, DeMatteo RP, Büchler MW, Weitz J (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149(5):680–688CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Mirrizzi PL (1942) Primary suture of the common bile duct in choledocholithiasis. Arch Surg 44:44–54CrossRef Mirrizzi PL (1942) Primary suture of the common bile duct in choledocholithiasis. Arch Surg 44:44–54CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Brewster OM (1957) Primary suture of the common bile duct; comparison with cases treated by standard methods. Can Med Assoc J 77(12):1111–1113PubMedPubMedCentral Brewster OM (1957) Primary suture of the common bile duct; comparison with cases treated by standard methods. Can Med Assoc J 77(12):1111–1113PubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Jeans P, Hall P, Liu Y, Baker R, Holt A, Saccone G, Harvey J, Scicchitano J, Toouli J (1993) MAXON is an optimal suture for bile duct anastomoses en pigs. HPB Surg 7(2):111–124CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jeans P, Hall P, Liu Y, Baker R, Holt A, Saccone G, Harvey J, Scicchitano J, Toouli J (1993) MAXON is an optimal suture for bile duct anastomoses en pigs. HPB Surg 7(2):111–124CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Rashid RM, Sartori M, White LE, Villa MT, Yoo SS, Alam M (2007) Breaking strength of barbed polypropylene sutures: rater-blinded, controlled comparison with non-barbed sutures of various calibers. Arch Dermatol 143:869–872CrossRefPubMed Rashid RM, Sartori M, White LE, Villa MT, Yoo SS, Alam M (2007) Breaking strength of barbed polypropylene sutures: rater-blinded, controlled comparison with non-barbed sutures of various calibers. Arch Dermatol 143:869–872CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Nemecek E, Negrin L, Beran C, Nemecek R, Hollinsky C (2013) The application of the V-Loc closure device for gastrointestinal sutures: a preliminary study. Surg Endosc 27:3830–3834CrossRefPubMed Nemecek E, Negrin L, Beran C, Nemecek R, Hollinsky C (2013) The application of the V-Loc closure device for gastrointestinal sutures: a preliminary study. Surg Endosc 27:3830–3834CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Knotless choledochorraphy with barbed suture, safe and feasible
Authors
Luis C. Fernandez
Augusto Toriz
Jorge Hernandez
Norberto Sanchez
Erick Linares
Massiel Zenteno
Adolfo Cuendis
Jose Olivares
Gustavo Guerrero
Cesar F. Cervantes
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4620-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2016 Go to the issue