Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Nephrology 1/2019

01-02-2019 | Review

Kidney transplantation in patients with previous renal cancer: a critical appraisal of current evidence and guidelines

Authors: Giovanni M. Frascà, Fabiana Brigante, Alessandro Volpe, Laura Cosmai, Maurizio Gallieni, Camillo Porta

Published in: Journal of Nephrology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Due to the increasing occurrence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the general population and the high prevalence of chronic kidney disease among cancer patients, many people with a previous RCC may eventually require renal replacement therapy including kidney transplantation. They should accordingly be evaluated to assess their life expectancy and the risk that the chronic immunosuppressive therapy needed after grafting might impair their long-term outcome. Current guidelines on listing patients for renal transplantation suggest that no delay is required for subjects with small or incidentally discovered RCC, while the recommendations for patients who have been treated for a symptomatic RCC or for those with large or invasive tumours are conflicting. The controversial results reported by even recent studies focusing on the cancer risk in kidney graft recipients with a prior history of malignancy do not help to clarify the doubts arising in everyday clinical practice. Several tools, including integrated scoring systems, are currently available to assess the prognosis of patients with a previous RCC and, although they have not been validated in subjects receiving long-term immunosuppressive drugs, they can be used to identify patients suitable to be listed for grafting. Among these, the Leibovich score is currently the most widely used as it has proved simple and reliable enough and helps categorize renal transplant candidates. According to this system, subjects with a score from 0 to 2 are at low risk and may be listed without delay, while those with a score of 6 or higher should be excluded from grafting. In addition, other factors have an established positive prognostic value, including chromophobe or clear cell papillary tumour, or G1 grade cancer; on the contrary, medullary or Bellini’s duct carcinoma or those with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation at histological examination should be excluded. All other patients would be better submitted to careful individual evaluation by an Oncologist before being listed for renal transplantation, pending studies specifically focusing on cancer risk evaluation in people already treated for malignancy receiving long-term immunosuppressive therapy.
Literature
7.
go back to reference Penn I (1997) Evaluation of transplant candidates with pre-existing malignancies. Ann Transpl 2:14–17 Penn I (1997) Evaluation of transplant candidates with pre-existing malignancies. Ann Transpl 2:14–17
9.
go back to reference Kasiske BL, Cangro CB, Hariharan S et al (2001) The evaluation of renal transplantation candidates: clinical practice guidelines. Am J Transpl 1(Suppl 2):3–95 Kasiske BL, Cangro CB, Hariharan S et al (2001) The evaluation of renal transplantation candidates: clinical practice guidelines. Am J Transpl 1(Suppl 2):3–95
25.
go back to reference Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H et al (2003) Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 27:612–624CrossRefPubMed Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H et al (2003) Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 27:612–624CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Delahunt B (1999) Sarcomatoid renal carcinoma: the final common dedifferentiation pathway of renal epithelial malignancies. Pathology 31:185–190CrossRefPubMed Delahunt B (1999) Sarcomatoid renal carcinoma: the final common dedifferentiation pathway of renal epithelial malignancies. Pathology 31:185–190CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Kidney transplantation in patients with previous renal cancer: a critical appraisal of current evidence and guidelines
Authors
Giovanni M. Frascà
Fabiana Brigante
Alessandro Volpe
Laura Cosmai
Maurizio Gallieni
Camillo Porta
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Nephrology / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1121-8428
Electronic ISSN: 1724-6059
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-018-0542-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Journal of Nephrology 1/2019 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine