Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 5/2019

Open Access 01-05-2019 | Keratoplasty | Cornea

Endothelial cell density and corneal graft thickness following excimer laser vs. femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty—a prospective randomized study

Authors: Gábor Tóth, Teona Butskhrikidze, Berthold Seitz, Achim Langenbucher, Tobias Hager, Elina Akhmedova, Moatasem El-Husseiny, Nóra Szentmáry

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The study aims to compare the impact of non-mechanical excimer laser-assisted (EXCIMER) and femtosecond laser-assisted (FEMTO) trephinations on graft endothelial cell density (ECD) and graft thickness before and after suture removal following penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

Methods

The inclusion criteria for this prospective, randomized, clinical study were as follows: (1) surgeries performed by one surgeon; (2) primary central PK; (3) keratoconus (KC) or Fuchs’ dystrophy (FUCHS); (4) no previous intraocular surgery; (5) graft oversize, 0.1 mm; and (6) 16-bite double-running suture. In 68 eyes of 68 patients (mean age: 53.3 ± 19.8 years), PK was performed using either 193-nm MEL70 excimer laser (“EXCIMER”: 17 KC, 18 FUCHS) or 60-KHz femtosecond laser (“FEMTO”: 17 KC, 16 FUCHS) trephination. Specular microscopy (EM 3000) and pachymetry (EM 3000; Pentacam HR; Casia SS-1000) were performed before removing the first suture (11.4 ± 1.9 months) and after removing the second suture (22.6 ± 3.8 months), but before any additional ophthalmic surgery.

Results

ECD did not differ significantly (P ≥ 0.436) between EXCIMER and FEMTO either with “all-sutures-in” (1887 ± 409 vs. 1886 ± 438) or with “all-sutures-out” (1703 ± 379 vs. 1737 ± 362). Central corneal thickness and corneal thickness at the thinnest point of the cornea did not differ significantly between EXCIMER and FEMTO either with all-sutures-in (P ≥ 0.096 and P ≥ 0.653) or with all-sutures-out (P ≥ 0.636 and P ≥ 0.717).

Conclusions

EXCIMER and FEMTO trephinations from the epithelial side seem to have no disadvantages regarding endothelial cell loss after PK, and both surgical procedures are safe for the endothelium. A larger sample size and longer follow-up are needed to evaluate the long-term impact of EXCIMER and FEMTO trephinations on ECD.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bourne WM, Nelson LR, Hodge DO (1997) Central corneal endothelial cell changes over a ten-year period. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:779–782PubMed Bourne WM, Nelson LR, Hodge DO (1997) Central corneal endothelial cell changes over a ten-year period. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:779–782PubMed
2.
go back to reference Naumann GOH, Seitz B, Lang GK, Langenbucher A, Kus MM (1993) [193 excimer laser trepanation in perforating keratoplasty]. Report of 70 patients. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 203:252–261CrossRefPubMed Naumann GOH, Seitz B, Lang GK, Langenbucher A, Kus MM (1993) [193 excimer laser trepanation in perforating keratoplasty]. Report of 70 patients. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 203:252–261CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Kus MM, Küchle M, Naumann GOH (1999) Nonmechanical corneal trephination with the excimer laser improves outcome after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 106:1156–1164CrossRefPubMed Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Kus MM, Küchle M, Naumann GOH (1999) Nonmechanical corneal trephination with the excimer laser improves outcome after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 106:1156–1164CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Price FW, Price MO (2008) Femtosecond laser shaped penetrating keratoplasty: one-year results utilizing a top-hat configuration. Am J Ophthalmol 145:210–214CrossRefPubMed Price FW, Price MO (2008) Femtosecond laser shaped penetrating keratoplasty: one-year results utilizing a top-hat configuration. Am J Ophthalmol 145:210–214CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Birnbaum F, Maier P, Reinhard T (2011) Perspectives of femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty. Ophthalmologe 108:807–816CrossRefPubMed Birnbaum F, Maier P, Reinhard T (2011) Perspectives of femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty. Ophthalmologe 108:807–816CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ing JJ, Ing HH, Nelson LR, Hodge DO, Bourne WM (1998) Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 105:1855–1865CrossRefPubMed Ing JJ, Ing HH, Nelson LR, Hodge DO, Bourne WM (1998) Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 105:1855–1865CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Patel SV, Hodge DO, Bourne WM (2005) Corneal endothelium and postperative outcomes 15 years after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 139:311–319CrossRefPubMed Patel SV, Hodge DO, Bourne WM (2005) Corneal endothelium and postperative outcomes 15 years after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 139:311–319CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Langenbucher A, Seitz B, Nguyen NX, Naumann GOH (2002) Corneal endothelial cell loss after nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty depends on diagnosis: a regression analysis. Graefe’s arch. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240:387–392CrossRef Langenbucher A, Seitz B, Nguyen NX, Naumann GOH (2002) Corneal endothelial cell loss after nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty depends on diagnosis: a regression analysis. Graefe’s arch. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240:387–392CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Naumann GOH (2011) Perspectives of excimer laser-assisted keratoplasty. Ophthalmologe 108:817–824CrossRefPubMed Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Naumann GOH (2011) Perspectives of excimer laser-assisted keratoplasty. Ophthalmologe 108:817–824CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Nguyen NX, Kus MM, Küchle M, Naumann GOH (2001) Graft endothelium and thickness after penetrating keratoplasty, comparing mechanical and excimer laser trephination: a prospective randomised study. Graefe’s arch. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239:12–17CrossRef Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Nguyen NX, Kus MM, Küchle M, Naumann GOH (2001) Graft endothelium and thickness after penetrating keratoplasty, comparing mechanical and excimer laser trephination: a prospective randomised study. Graefe’s arch. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239:12–17CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Birnbaum F, Wiggermann A, Maier PC, Böhringer D, Reinhard T (2013) Clinical results of 123 femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasties. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251:95–103CrossRefPubMed Birnbaum F, Wiggermann A, Maier PC, Böhringer D, Reinhard T (2013) Clinical results of 123 femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasties. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251:95–103CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Daniel MC, Böhringer D, Maier P, Eberwein P, Birnbaum F, Reinhard T (2016) Comparison of long-term outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty with conventional keratoplasty. Cornea 35:293–298CrossRefPubMed Daniel MC, Böhringer D, Maier P, Eberwein P, Birnbaum F, Reinhard T (2016) Comparison of long-term outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty with conventional keratoplasty. Cornea 35:293–298CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference El-Husseiny M, Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Akhmedova E, Szentmáry N, Hager T, Tsintarakis T, Janunts E (2015) Excimer versus femtosecond laser assisted penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus and Fuchs dystrophy: intraoperative pitfalls. J Ophthalmol 645830 El-Husseiny M, Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Akhmedova E, Szentmáry N, Hager T, Tsintarakis T, Janunts E (2015) Excimer versus femtosecond laser assisted penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus and Fuchs dystrophy: intraoperative pitfalls. J Ophthalmol 645830
14.
go back to reference Hoffmann F (1976) Suture technique for penetrating keratoplasty. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 169:584–590PubMed Hoffmann F (1976) Suture technique for penetrating keratoplasty. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 169:584–590PubMed
15.
go back to reference Legeais JM, Parel JM, Simon G, Ren Q, Denham D (1993) Endothelial damage by the corneal Hessburg-Barron vacuum trephine. Refract Corneal Surg 9:255–258PubMed Legeais JM, Parel JM, Simon G, Ren Q, Denham D (1993) Endothelial damage by the corneal Hessburg-Barron vacuum trephine. Refract Corneal Surg 9:255–258PubMed
16.
go back to reference Böhnke M, Draeger J, Niesmann U (1982) Effect of the cutting procedure on the vitality of corneal endothelium in donor material. Ophthalmic Res 14:459–465CrossRefPubMed Böhnke M, Draeger J, Niesmann U (1982) Effect of the cutting procedure on the vitality of corneal endothelium in donor material. Ophthalmic Res 14:459–465CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kim JH, Choi SK, Lee D (2009) The comparison of femtosceond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty with conventional surgery in terms of endothelial safety: ex vivo study using porcine eyes. Cornea 28:812–816CrossRefPubMed Kim JH, Choi SK, Lee D (2009) The comparison of femtosceond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty with conventional surgery in terms of endothelial safety: ex vivo study using porcine eyes. Cornea 28:812–816CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Koch JW, Lang GK, Naumann GOH (1991) Endothelial reactions to perforating and non-perforating excimer laser excisions in rabbits. Refract Corneal Surg 7:214–222PubMed Koch JW, Lang GK, Naumann GOH (1991) Endothelial reactions to perforating and non-perforating excimer laser excisions in rabbits. Refract Corneal Surg 7:214–222PubMed
19.
go back to reference Schumacher M, Langenbucher A, Seitz B (2017) Development of endothelial cell density after penetrating keratoplasty in patients with Fuchs dystrophy or keratoconus – comparison of excimer laser and mechanical trephination. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 234:697–705CrossRefPubMed Schumacher M, Langenbucher A, Seitz B (2017) Development of endothelial cell density after penetrating keratoplasty in patients with Fuchs dystrophy or keratoconus – comparison of excimer laser and mechanical trephination. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 234:697–705CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Resch MD, Zemova E, Marsovszky L et al (2015) In vivo confocal microscopic imaging of the cornea after femtosecond and excimer laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty. J Refract Surg 31:620–626CrossRefPubMed Resch MD, Zemova E, Marsovszky L et al (2015) In vivo confocal microscopic imaging of the cornea after femtosecond and excimer laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty. J Refract Surg 31:620–626CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Küchle M, Nguyen NX, Naumann GOH (1994) Aqueous flare following penetrating keratoplasty and in corneal graft rejection. Arch Ophthalmol 112:354–358CrossRefPubMed Küchle M, Nguyen NX, Naumann GOH (1994) Aqueous flare following penetrating keratoplasty and in corneal graft rejection. Arch Ophthalmol 112:354–358CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Küchle M, Nguyen NX, Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Naumann GOH (1998) Blood-aqueous barrier after mechanical or nonmechanical excimer laser trephination in penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 125:177–181CrossRefPubMed Küchle M, Nguyen NX, Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Naumann GOH (1998) Blood-aqueous barrier after mechanical or nonmechanical excimer laser trephination in penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 125:177–181CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kiss HJ, Takács ÁI, Kránitz K, Sándor GL, Tóth G, Gilányi B, Nagy ZZ (2016) One-day use of preoperative topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug prevents intraoperative prostaglandin level elevation during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Curr Eye Res 41:1064–1067CrossRefPubMed Kiss HJ, Takács ÁI, Kránitz K, Sándor GL, Tóth G, Gilányi B, Nagy ZZ (2016) One-day use of preoperative topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug prevents intraoperative prostaglandin level elevation during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Curr Eye Res 41:1064–1067CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Tóth G, Sándor GL, Kleiner D, Szentmáry N, Kiss HJ, Blázovics A, Nagy ZZ (2016) Evaluation of free radical quantity in the anterior chamber following femtosecond-laser assisted capsulotomy. Orv Hetil 157:1880–1883CrossRefPubMed Tóth G, Sándor GL, Kleiner D, Szentmáry N, Kiss HJ, Blázovics A, Nagy ZZ (2016) Evaluation of free radical quantity in the anterior chamber following femtosecond-laser assisted capsulotomy. Orv Hetil 157:1880–1883CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Murano N, Ishizaki M, Sato S, Fukuda Y, Takahashi H (2008) Corneal endothelial cell damage by free radicals associated with ultrasound oscillation. Arch Ophthalmol 126:816–821CrossRefPubMed Murano N, Ishizaki M, Sato S, Fukuda Y, Takahashi H (2008) Corneal endothelial cell damage by free radicals associated with ultrasound oscillation. Arch Ophthalmol 126:816–821CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Abott RL, Fine M, Guillet E (1983) Long-term changes in corneal endothelium following penetrating keratoplasty: a specular microscopy study. Ophthalmology 90:676–685CrossRef Abott RL, Fine M, Guillet E (1983) Long-term changes in corneal endothelium following penetrating keratoplasty: a specular microscopy study. Ophthalmology 90:676–685CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Reinhard T, Böhringer D, Hüschen D, Sundmacher R (2002) Chronic endothelial cell loss of the graft after penetrating keratoplasty: influence of endothelial cell migration from graft to host. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 219:410–416CrossRefPubMed Reinhard T, Böhringer D, Hüschen D, Sundmacher R (2002) Chronic endothelial cell loss of the graft after penetrating keratoplasty: influence of endothelial cell migration from graft to host. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 219:410–416CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Steinert RF, Ignacio TS, Sarayba MA (2007) “Top hat”-shaped penetrating keratoplasty using the femtosecond laser. Am J Ophthalmol 143:689–691CrossRefPubMed Steinert RF, Ignacio TS, Sarayba MA (2007) “Top hat”-shaped penetrating keratoplasty using the femtosecond laser. Am J Ophthalmol 143:689–691CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Endothelial cell density and corneal graft thickness following excimer laser vs. femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty—a prospective randomized study
Authors
Gábor Tóth
Teona Butskhrikidze
Berthold Seitz
Achim Langenbucher
Tobias Hager
Elina Akhmedova
Moatasem El-Husseiny
Nóra Szentmáry
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04263-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 5/2019 Go to the issue