Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Ophthalmology 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Keratoplasty | Research

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty after failed penetrating keratoplasty– case series and review of the literature

Authors: Agata Anna Wykrota, Loïc Hamon, Loay Daas, Berthold Seitz

Published in: BMC Ophthalmology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study aims to evaluate visual outcome, central corneal thickness, and re-bubbling rate in a cohort with undersized sequential Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) due to endothelial graft decompensation following primary penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

Methods

All patients who received a sequential DMEK (n = 16) or triple DMEK (n = 2) after failed primary PK between November 2020 and June 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Analyzed parameters were corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), re-bubbling rate and graft survival.

Results

18 eyes of 18 patients were included. All patients underwent a DMEK with undersized graft after failed PK(s). Mean time between the last PK and DMEK was 102 ± 82 weeks. Mean follow-up time was 8.9 ± 4.6 months. CDVA increased significantly from 1.12 ± 0.60 logMAR preoperatively to 0.64 ± 0.49 logMAR 6 weeks postoperatively (p = 0.013). Mean CCT decreased significantly from 807 ± 224 μm before to 573 ± 151 μm 6 weeks after DMEK (p = 0.003). Re-bubbling was necessary in eight eyes (44.4%) after a median time of 7 days. The 12-month Kaplan Meier survival was 66.7%.

Conclusion

In case of endothelial graft decompensation without stromal scars after primary PK, a DMEK can be performed for selected patients who had satisfying CDVA before the endothelial decompensation. Prior to DMEK indication, an AS-OCT should routinely be performed to circularly search for posterior steps at the PK graft margin, as well as shortly after DMEK to exclude a detachment of the endothelial graft. All patients should be informed about a higher re-bubbling rate in comparison to primary DMEK.
Literature
4.
6.
go back to reference Stavridis E, Gatzioufas Z, Hasenfus A, Sauter M, Smola S, Seitz B. [Ping-pong transmission of herpex simplex virus 1 following corneal transplantation]. Ophthalmologe. 2012;109:1017–21.CrossRefPubMed Stavridis E, Gatzioufas Z, Hasenfus A, Sauter M, Smola S, Seitz B. [Ping-pong transmission of herpex simplex virus 1 following corneal transplantation]. Ophthalmologe. 2012;109:1017–21.CrossRefPubMed
8.
15.
go back to reference Gundlach E, Maier AKB, Riechardt AI, Brockmann T, Bertelmann E, Joussen A, Torun N. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty as a secondary approach after failure of penetrating keratoplasty. Exp Clin Transpl. 2015;13:350–4. Gundlach E, Maier AKB, Riechardt AI, Brockmann T, Bertelmann E, Joussen A, Torun N. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty as a secondary approach after failure of penetrating keratoplasty. Exp Clin Transpl. 2015;13:350–4.
29.
go back to reference Seitz B, Daas L, Hamon L, Fraenkel D, Szentmáry N, Langenbucher A, Suffo S. [Penetrating keratoplasty]. In: Thuret G, Muraine M, editors. Corneal endothelium. Paris: Elsevier Masson; 2021. pp. 121–6. Seitz B, Daas L, Hamon L, Fraenkel D, Szentmáry N, Langenbucher A, Suffo S. [Penetrating keratoplasty]. In: Thuret G, Muraine M, editors. Corneal endothelium. Paris: Elsevier Masson; 2021. pp. 121–6.
30.
Metadata
Title
Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty after failed penetrating keratoplasty– case series and review of the literature
Authors
Agata Anna Wykrota
Loïc Hamon
Loay Daas
Berthold Seitz
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Keratoplasty
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2415
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03279-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Ophthalmology 1/2024 Go to the issue