Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 11/2020

01-11-2020 | Original Paper

Keratoconus progression after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation according to age: 5-year follow-up cohort study

Authors: Bruno Schneider de Araujo, Leticia Kubo, Diane Ruschel Marinho, Sergio Kwitko

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 11/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background/aims

Intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) have been found to be useful in correcting keratoconus by decreasing irregular astigmatism, thereby potentially improving visual acuity. However, its long-term effects in keratoconus progression are not completely understood, mainly concerning the effects of age on ICRS implantation results. This study aimed to evaluate long-term effects of ICRS implantation according to age at implantation.

Methods

We conducted a longitudinal retrospective study, where we evaluated patients with keratoconus who underwent ICRS implantation between 2004 and 2012.

Results

We evaluated 34 eyes for 5 years post-operatively. The mean age of the 21 men and 7 women was 20.59 ± 4.65 years. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) improved from 0.32 ± 0.19 in the preoperative period to 0.46 ± 0.27 6 months post-operatively. After up to 5 years of follow-up, there was no significant difference in mean visual acuity of the group. As expected, there was a significant decrease in keratometric values after corneal ring implantation, which remained stable over the 5-year follow-up. Among the 34 cases analysed, nine (26%) showed signs of disease progression. In eight of the nine documented progression cases, patients were 21 years old or younger, revealing that these patients were sevenfold more likely to progress than those aged over 21 years.

Conclusion

In our series of cases, ICRS implantation was shown to be an excellent treatment to reduce corneal curvature and improve visual acuity at all ages, but it did not stabilize the disease, especially in young patients with more aggressive forms of the keratoconus.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Zadnik K, Barr JT, Edrington TB et al (1998) Baseline findings in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:2537–2546PubMed Zadnik K, Barr JT, Edrington TB et al (1998) Baseline findings in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:2537–2546PubMed
3.
go back to reference Jonas JB, Nangia V, Matin A et al (2009) Prevalence and associations of keratoconus in rural Maharashtra in central India: the central India eye and medical study. Am J Ophthalmol 148:760–765CrossRef Jonas JB, Nangia V, Matin A et al (2009) Prevalence and associations of keratoconus in rural Maharashtra in central India: the central India eye and medical study. Am J Ophthalmol 148:760–765CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Owens H, Gamble G (2003) A profile of keratoconus in New Zealand. Cornea 22:122–125CrossRef Owens H, Gamble G (2003) A profile of keratoconus in New Zealand. Cornea 22:122–125CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fink BA, Sinnott LT, Wagner H et al (2010) The influence of gender and hormone status on the severity and progression of keratoconus. Cornea 29:65–72CrossRef Fink BA, Sinnott LT, Wagner H et al (2010) The influence of gender and hormone status on the severity and progression of keratoconus. Cornea 29:65–72CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sekundo W, Stevens JD (2001) Surgical treatment of keratoconus at the turn of the 20th century. J Refract Surg 17:69–73PubMed Sekundo W, Stevens JD (2001) Surgical treatment of keratoconus at the turn of the 20th century. J Refract Surg 17:69–73PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kwitko S, Severo NS (2004) Ferrara intracorneal ring segments for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:812–820CrossRef Kwitko S, Severo NS (2004) Ferrara intracorneal ring segments for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:812–820CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Coskunseven E, Sharma DP, Grentzelos MA et al (2017) Four-stage procedure for keratoconus: ICRS implantation, corneal cross-linking, toric phakic intraocular lens implantation, and topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 33:683–689CrossRef Coskunseven E, Sharma DP, Grentzelos MA et al (2017) Four-stage procedure for keratoconus: ICRS implantation, corneal cross-linking, toric phakic intraocular lens implantation, and topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 33:683–689CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Olivares Jimenez JL, Guerrero Jurado JC, Bermudez Rodriguez FJ et al (1997) Keratoconus: age of onset and natural history. Optom Vis Sci 74:147–151CrossRef Olivares Jimenez JL, Guerrero Jurado JC, Bermudez Rodriguez FJ et al (1997) Keratoconus: age of onset and natural history. Optom Vis Sci 74:147–151CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Al Suhaibani AH, Al-Rajhi AA, Al-Motowa S et al (2007) Inverse relationship between age and severity and sequelae of acute corneal hydrops associated with keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 91:984–985CrossRef Al Suhaibani AH, Al-Rajhi AA, Al-Motowa S et al (2007) Inverse relationship between age and severity and sequelae of acute corneal hydrops associated with keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 91:984–985CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zare MA, Hashemi H, Salari MR (2007) Intracorneal ring segment implantation for the management of keratoconus: safety and efficacy. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1886–1891CrossRef Zare MA, Hashemi H, Salari MR (2007) Intracorneal ring segment implantation for the management of keratoconus: safety and efficacy. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1886–1891CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dauwe C, Touboul D, Roberts CJ et al (2009) Biomechanical and morphological corneal response to placement of intrastromal corneal ring segments for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1761–1767CrossRef Dauwe C, Touboul D, Roberts CJ et al (2009) Biomechanical and morphological corneal response to placement of intrastromal corneal ring segments for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1761–1767CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Torquetti L, Berbel RF, Ferrara P (2009) Long-term follow-up of intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1768–1773CrossRef Torquetti L, Berbel RF, Ferrara P (2009) Long-term follow-up of intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1768–1773CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Harrison RJ, Klouda PT, Easty DL et al (1989) Association between keratoconus and atopy. Br J Ophthalmol 73:816–822CrossRef Harrison RJ, Klouda PT, Easty DL et al (1989) Association between keratoconus and atopy. Br J Ophthalmol 73:816–822CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Vega-Estrada A, Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB (2015) Keratoconus progression after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation in young patients: five-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:1145–1152CrossRef Vega-Estrada A, Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB (2015) Keratoconus progression after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation in young patients: five-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:1145–1152CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bedi R, Touboul D, Pinsard L et al (2012) Refractive and topographic stability of Intacs in eyes with progressive keratoconus: five-year follow-up. J Refract Surg 28:392–396CrossRef Bedi R, Touboul D, Pinsard L et al (2012) Refractive and topographic stability of Intacs in eyes with progressive keratoconus: five-year follow-up. J Refract Surg 28:392–396CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Giacomin NT, Mello GR, Medeiros CS et al (2016) Intracorneal Ring Segments Implantation for Corneal Ectasia. J Refract Surg 32:829–839CrossRef Giacomin NT, Mello GR, Medeiros CS et al (2016) Intracorneal Ring Segments Implantation for Corneal Ectasia. J Refract Surg 32:829–839CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Leoni-Mesplie S, Mortemousque B, Touboul D et al (2012) Scalability and severity of keratoconus in children. Am J Ophthalmol 154:56–62CrossRef Leoni-Mesplie S, Mortemousque B, Touboul D et al (2012) Scalability and severity of keratoconus in children. Am J Ophthalmol 154:56–62CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rabinowitz YS, Nesburn AB, McDonnell PJ (1993) Videokeratography of the fellow eye in unilateral keratoconus. Ophthalmology 100:181–186CrossRef Rabinowitz YS, Nesburn AB, McDonnell PJ (1993) Videokeratography of the fellow eye in unilateral keratoconus. Ophthalmology 100:181–186CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Coskunseven E, Jankov MR 2nd, Hafezi F et al (2009) Effect of treatment sequence in combined intrastromal corneal rings and corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:2084–2091CrossRef Coskunseven E, Jankov MR 2nd, Hafezi F et al (2009) Effect of treatment sequence in combined intrastromal corneal rings and corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:2084–2091CrossRef
22.
go back to reference El-Raggal TM (2011) Sequential versus concurrent KERARINGS insertion and corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 95:37–41CrossRef El-Raggal TM (2011) Sequential versus concurrent KERARINGS insertion and corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 95:37–41CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Keratoconus progression after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation according to age: 5-year follow-up cohort study
Authors
Bruno Schneider de Araujo
Leticia Kubo
Diane Ruschel Marinho
Sergio Kwitko
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01468-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2020

International Ophthalmology 11/2020 Go to the issue