Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 11/2012

01-11-2012 | Technical Innovation

Isotropic 3-D T2-weighted spin-echo for abdominal and pelvic MRI in children

Authors: Sílvia Costa Dias, Øystein E. Olsen

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 11/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

MRI has a fundamental role in paediatric imaging. The T2-weighted fast/turbo spin-echo sequence is important because it has high signal-to-noise ratio compared to gradient-echo sequences. It is usually acquired as 2-D sections in one or more planes. Volumetric spin-echo has until recently only been possible with very long echo times due to blurring of the soft-tissue contrast with long echo trains. A new 3-D spin-echo sequence uses variable flip angles to overcome this problem. It may reproduce useful soft-tissue contrast, with improved spatial resolution. Its isotropic capability allows subsequent reconstruction in standard, curved or arbitrary planes. It may be particularly useful for visualisation of small lesions, or if large lesions distort the usual anatomical relations. We present clinical examples, describe the technical parameters and discuss some potential artefacts and optimisation of image quality.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rosenkrantz AB, Patel JM, Babb JS et al (2010) Liver MRI at 3 T using respiratory-triggered time-efficient 3D T2-weighted technique: impact on artifacts and image quality. AJR 194:634–641PubMedCrossRef Rosenkrantz AB, Patel JM, Babb JS et al (2010) Liver MRI at 3 T using respiratory-triggered time-efficient 3D T2-weighted technique: impact on artifacts and image quality. AJR 194:634–641PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Proscia N, Jaffe TA, Neville AM et al (2010) MRI of the pelvis in women: 3D versus 2D T2-weighted technique. AJR 195:254–259PubMedCrossRef Proscia N, Jaffe TA, Neville AM et al (2010) MRI of the pelvis in women: 3D versus 2D T2-weighted technique. AJR 195:254–259PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Haystead CM, Dale BM, Merkle EM (2008) N/2 ghosting artifacts: elimination at 3.0-T MR cholangiography with SPACE pulse sequence. Radiology 246:589–595PubMedCrossRef Haystead CM, Dale BM, Merkle EM (2008) N/2 ghosting artifacts: elimination at 3.0-T MR cholangiography with SPACE pulse sequence. Radiology 246:589–595PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rosenkrantz AB, Neil J, Kong X et al (2010) Prostate cancer: comparison of 3D T2-weighted with conventional 2D T2-weighted imaging for image quality and tumor detection. AJR 194:446–452PubMedCrossRef Rosenkrantz AB, Neil J, Kong X et al (2010) Prostate cancer: comparison of 3D T2-weighted with conventional 2D T2-weighted imaging for image quality and tumor detection. AJR 194:446–452PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Choi JY, Kim MJ, Chung YE et al (2008) Abdominal applications of 3.0- T MR imaging: comparative review versus a 1.5-T system. Radiographics 28:e30. doi:10.1148/radiol.e30 Choi JY, Kim MJ, Chung YE et al (2008) Abdominal applications of 3.0- T MR imaging: comparative review versus a 1.5-T system. Radiographics 28:e30. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​e30
7.
go back to reference Chavhan GB, Babyn PS, Singh M et al (2009) Imaging at 3.0 T in children: technical differences, safety issues, and initial experience. Radiographics 29:1451–1466PubMedCrossRef Chavhan GB, Babyn PS, Singh M et al (2009) Imaging at 3.0 T in children: technical differences, safety issues, and initial experience. Radiographics 29:1451–1466PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Vasanawala SS, Madhuranthakam AJ, Venkatesan R et al (2011) Volumetric fat-water separated T2-weighted MRI. Pediatr Radiol 41:875–883PubMedCrossRef Vasanawala SS, Madhuranthakam AJ, Venkatesan R et al (2011) Volumetric fat-water separated T2-weighted MRI. Pediatr Radiol 41:875–883PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Isotropic 3-D T2-weighted spin-echo for abdominal and pelvic MRI in children
Authors
Sílvia Costa Dias
Øystein E. Olsen
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 11/2012
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2395-1

Other articles of this Issue 11/2012

Pediatric Radiology 11/2012 Go to the issue

Hermes

Hermes