Published in:
01-08-2018 | Original Contributions
Is the Sleeve Gastrectomy Always a Better Procedure? Five-Year Results from a Retrospective Matched Case-Control Study
Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 8/2018
Login to get accessAbstract
Introduction
Bariatric surgery is considered the most effective treatment for obesity. A recent worldwide survey demonstrated that Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure, while Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) has been almost abandoned.
Objectives
The aim of this retrospective study was to compare 5-year results of LSG and LAGB at our Institution.
Materials and Methods
Prospective maintained database of our Institution was reviewed to find all patients who had undergone LSG between January 2009 and December 2011. Inclusion criteria were BMI of 40–50 kg/m2 and age of 18–60 years old. Patients with Class I and II obesity, superobese subjects, and patients with previous history of bariatric surgery were excluded. Data on sex, age, pre-operative BMI, obesity-related diseases (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia), and early and late complications were collected. Each subject who underwent LSG was matched one-to-one with a patient that had undergone LAGB. Outcomes were analyzed at 1, 3, and 5 years of follow-up.
Results
A total number of 122 patients were included in this study, 61 in each group. Better %EWL was observed in the LSG group at 1, 3, and 5 years. Both procedures induced improvements of obesity-related diseases without significant difference. In the LAGB group, ten patients underwent uneventful band removal. In the LSG group, two patients had serious postoperative complications.
Conclusion
LSG achieves better %EWL than LAGB within 5 years, but comorbidities improvement is not significantly different. Severity of complication is higher after LSG. LAGB is still a good option for selected patients.