Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2014

01-10-2014

Is next-day discharge following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass safe in select patients? Analysis of short-term outcomes

Authors: Ahmad Elnahas, David Urbach, Allan Okrainec, Fayez Quereshy, Timothy D. Jackson

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is controversy surrounding the safety and feasibility of next-day discharge following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for morbid obesity. The objective of this study was to determine if next-day discharge following LRYGB is comparable to standard discharge (i.e. postoperative day two) with respect to 30-day patient outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using data from the American College of Surgeons’ National Surgery Quality Improvement Program participant use files. The study population consisted of patients discharged on either postoperative day (POD) 1 or 2 that underwent an elective LRYGB for morbid obesity between 2005 and 2012. Patients were excluded if they had recent surgery, any relative contraindication to bariatric surgery, or any recorded complication/death during their principal admission. The primary outcome was 30-day overall complications and secondary outcomes were 30-day major complications and reoperations. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate each outcome based on discharge day.

Results

The study population consisted of 6,166 and 30,966 patients discharged on POD 1 and 2, respectively. No major clinical differences were found between the two groups with respect to relevant patient and operative characteristics. After adjustment, the odds ratios for 30-day overall complications, major complications, and reoperations with next-day discharge were 0.98 (p = 0.870, 95 % CI [0.81–1.19]), 0.81 (p = 0.204, 95 % CI [0.58–1.12]) and 1.06 (p = 0.717, 95 % CI [0.79–1.41]), respectively. Body mass index ≥50, operative time ≥3 h, diabetes, dyspnea and hypertension were significant predictors for complications in patients discharged the next day.

Conclusions

Using this large national surgical database, LRYGB patients discharged on POD 1 did not have a significantly higher rate of adverse events compared to patients discharged on POD 2. Understanding the important predictors of adverse events following LRYGB will help bariatric surgeons implement next-day discharge protocols based on the appropriate perioperative evaluation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mccarty TM, Arnold DT, Lamont JP, Fisher TL, Kuhn JA (2005) Optimizing outcomes in bariatric surgery: outpatient laparoscopic gastric bypass. Ann Surg 242(4):494–501PubMedPubMedCentral Mccarty TM, Arnold DT, Lamont JP, Fisher TL, Kuhn JA (2005) Optimizing outcomes in bariatric surgery: outpatient laparoscopic gastric bypass. Ann Surg 242(4):494–501PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Hollenbeak CS, Rogers AM, Barrus B, Wadiwala I, Cooney RN (2008) Surgical volume impacts bariatric surgery mortality: a case for centers of excellence. Surgery 144(5):736–743PubMedCrossRef Hollenbeak CS, Rogers AM, Barrus B, Wadiwala I, Cooney RN (2008) Surgical volume impacts bariatric surgery mortality: a case for centers of excellence. Surgery 144(5):736–743PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tuggle KR, Duncan TD, Hobson LL, Carr A, Sans K (2011) Is 23 hour observation for gastric bypass surgery safe? Obesity Surgery. In: Conference: 16th congress of the international federation for the surgery of obesity and metabolic disorders, IFSO 2011 Hamburg, Germany vol 21, issue 8, p 1103 Tuggle KR, Duncan TD, Hobson LL, Carr A, Sans K (2011) Is 23 hour observation for gastric bypass surgery safe? Obesity Surgery. In: Conference: 16th congress of the international federation for the surgery of obesity and metabolic disorders, IFSO 2011 Hamburg, Germany vol 21, issue 8, p 1103
4.
go back to reference Sasse KC, Ganser JH, Kozar MD, Watson RW, Lim DC, Mcginley L, Smith CJ, Bovee V, Beh J (2009) Outpatient weight loss surgery: initiating a gastric bypass and gastric banding ambulatory weight loss surgery center. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13(1):50–55 Sasse KC, Ganser JH, Kozar MD, Watson RW, Lim DC, Mcginley L, Smith CJ, Bovee V, Beh J (2009) Outpatient weight loss surgery: initiating a gastric bypass and gastric banding ambulatory weight loss surgery center. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13(1):50–55
5.
go back to reference Thomas H, Agrawal S (2011) Systematic review of 23-h (outpatient) stay laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21(8):677–681PubMedCrossRef Thomas H, Agrawal S (2011) Systematic review of 23-h (outpatient) stay laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21(8):677–681PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fares LG, Reeder RC, Bock J, Batezel V (2008) 23-h stay outcomes for laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass in a small, teaching community hospital. Am Surg 74(12):1206–1210PubMed Fares LG, Reeder RC, Bock J, Batezel V (2008) 23-h stay outcomes for laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass in a small, teaching community hospital. Am Surg 74(12):1206–1210PubMed
7.
go back to reference Morton JM, Winegar D, Blackstone R, Wolfe B (2014) Is ambulatory laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass associated with higher adverse events? Ann Surg 259(2):286–292 Morton JM, Winegar D, Blackstone R, Wolfe B (2014) Is ambulatory laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass associated with higher adverse events? Ann Surg 259(2):286–292
8.
go back to reference Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J (2007) The patient safety in surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations. J Am Coll Surg 204(6):1089–1102PubMedCrossRef Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J (2007) The patient safety in surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations. J Am Coll Surg 204(6):1089–1102PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W (1997) Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg 185(4):315–327PubMed Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W (1997) Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg 185(4):315–327PubMed
10.
go back to reference Daley J, Khuri SF, Henderson W (1997) Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg 185(4):328–340PubMed Daley J, Khuri SF, Henderson W (1997) Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg 185(4):328–340PubMed
11.
go back to reference Daley J, Forbes MG, Young GJ (1997) Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: site visit assessment of process and structure National VA Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg 185(4):341–351PubMed Daley J, Forbes MG, Young GJ (1997) Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: site visit assessment of process and structure National VA Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg 185(4):341–351PubMed
12.
go back to reference Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J (2008) Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the patient safety in surgery study. Ann Surg 248(2):329–336PubMedCrossRef Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J (2008) Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the patient safety in surgery study. Ann Surg 248(2):329–336PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Finks J, Dimick J, English W, Carlin A, Hawasli A, Wood M, Genaw J, Share D, Birkmeyer J, Birkmeyer NJ (2012) Effects of early discharge on morbidity, mortality, ED visits and readmissions following laparoscopic gastric bypass: results from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative.In: 29th annual meeting of the American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery (ASMBS 2012), San Diego. Plenary Session Abstract PL-132 Finks J, Dimick J, English W, Carlin A, Hawasli A, Wood M, Genaw J, Share D, Birkmeyer J, Birkmeyer NJ (2012) Effects of early discharge on morbidity, mortality, ED visits and readmissions following laparoscopic gastric bypass: results from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative.In: 29th annual meeting of the American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery (ASMBS 2012), San Diego. Plenary Session Abstract PL-132
14.
go back to reference Courcoulas A, Schuchert M, Gatti G, Luketich J (2003) The relationship of surgeon and hospital volume to outcome after gastric bypass surgery in pennsylvania: a 3-year summary. Surgery 134(4):613–621PubMedCrossRef Courcoulas A, Schuchert M, Gatti G, Luketich J (2003) The relationship of surgeon and hospital volume to outcome after gastric bypass surgery in pennsylvania: a 3-year summary. Surgery 134(4):613–621PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dos santos M, Madalosso CA, Palma LA, Da silva Fornari AC, Do Socorro D, Scherer T, Gurski RR, Fornari F (2009) Hospital discharge in the day following open roux-en-y gastric bypass: is it feasible and safe? Obes Surg 19(3):281–286CrossRef Dos santos M, Madalosso CA, Palma LA, Da silva Fornari AC, Do Socorro D, Scherer T, Gurski RR, Fornari F (2009) Hospital discharge in the day following open roux-en-y gastric bypass: is it feasible and safe? Obes Surg 19(3):281–286CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Madan AK, Speck KE, Ternovits CA, Tichansky DS (2006) Outcome of a clinical pathway for discharge within 48 h after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Am J Surg 192(3):399–402PubMedCrossRef Madan AK, Speck KE, Ternovits CA, Tichansky DS (2006) Outcome of a clinical pathway for discharge within 48 h after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Am J Surg 192(3):399–402PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Muller MK, Dedes KJ, Dindo D, Steiner S, Hahnloser D, Clavien PA (2009) Impact of clinical pathways in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394(1):31–39PubMedCrossRef Muller MK, Dedes KJ, Dindo D, Steiner S, Hahnloser D, Clavien PA (2009) Impact of clinical pathways in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394(1):31–39PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ronellenfitsch U, Schwarzbach M, Kring A, Kienle P, Post S, Hasenberg T (2012) The effect of clinical pathways for bariatric surgery on perioperative quality of care. Obes Surg 22(5):732–739PubMedCrossRef Ronellenfitsch U, Schwarzbach M, Kring A, Kienle P, Post S, Hasenberg T (2012) The effect of clinical pathways for bariatric surgery on perioperative quality of care. Obes Surg 22(5):732–739PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lancaster RT, Hutter MM (2008) Bands and bypasses: 30-day morbidity and mortality of bariatric surgical procedures as assessed by prospective, multi-center, risk-adjusted ACS-NSQIP data. Surg Endosc 22(12):256–2554CrossRef Lancaster RT, Hutter MM (2008) Bands and bypasses: 30-day morbidity and mortality of bariatric surgical procedures as assessed by prospective, multi-center, risk-adjusted ACS-NSQIP data. Surg Endosc 22(12):256–2554CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is next-day discharge following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass safe in select patients? Analysis of short-term outcomes
Authors
Ahmad Elnahas
David Urbach
Allan Okrainec
Fayez Quereshy
Timothy D. Jackson
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3546-2

Other articles of this Issue 10/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2014 Go to the issue