Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 4/2013

01-08-2013 | Review Article

Is it Time to Rejuvenate the Forceps?

Authors: Sanchila Talukdar, Nikhil Purandare, Sam Coulter-Smith, Michael Geary

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The obstetric forceps was designed to assist extraction of the foetal head and thereby accomplish delivery of the foetus in the second stage of labour. More than 700 types of obstetric forceps have been described. An understanding of the anatomy of the birth canal and the foetal head is a prerequisite to becoming a skilled and safe user of forceps. Operative vaginal delivery rates have remained stable at between 10 and 13 %. The last few decades has seen a rise in caesarean section, along with the introduction and safe use of the vacuum extractor. This has resulted in a decline both in the use of the obstetric forceps as well as in the training for the same. The forceps is less likely to fail when used as the primary instrument thereby reducing the need for the sequential use of two instruments which increase the morbidity of the neonate. Perineal trauma is more likely to occur with the use of the forceps but the evidence is that the maternal concern is less when compared to the ventouse. Simulation training is an important part of obstetric training. Application of forceps blades in the simulation setting can improve the skill level of obstetricians. The use of the forceps should not be decreasing and more senior involvement in training is necessary so that juniors develop the proper skills to perform forceps delivery in a competent and safe manner. It is vital that the art of the forceps is not lost to future generations of obstetricians and the women they care for.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Okunwobi-Smith Y, Cooke I, MacKenzie IZ, et al. Decision to delivery intervals for assisted vaginal vertex delivery. Br J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2000;107:467–71.CrossRef Okunwobi-Smith Y, Cooke I, MacKenzie IZ, et al. Decision to delivery intervals for assisted vaginal vertex delivery. Br J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2000;107:467–71.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Demissie K, Rhoads GG, Smulian JC, et al. Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes: population based retrospective analysis. BMJ. 2004;329:24–9.PubMedCrossRef Demissie K, Rhoads GG, Smulian JC, et al. Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes: population based retrospective analysis. BMJ. 2004;329:24–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, et al. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;3:CD003766.PubMed Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, et al. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;3:CD003766.PubMed
7.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 17: operative vaginal delivery. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2000. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 17: operative vaginal delivery. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2000.
9.
go back to reference De Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, et al. Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG. 2001;108:383–7.PubMed De Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, et al. Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG. 2001;108:383–7.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Dupuis O, Madelenat P, Rudigoz RC. Fecal and urinary incontinence after delivery: risk factors and prevention. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2004;32:540–8.PubMedCrossRef Dupuis O, Madelenat P, Rudigoz RC. Fecal and urinary incontinence after delivery: risk factors and prevention. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2004;32:540–8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Vacca A. The trouble with vacuum extraction. Curr Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;9:41–5.CrossRef Vacca A. The trouble with vacuum extraction. Curr Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;9:41–5.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rosemann GWE. Vacuum extraction of premature infants. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol. 1969;7:10–2. Rosemann GWE. Vacuum extraction of premature infants. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol. 1969;7:10–2.
13.
go back to reference Corcoran S, Clarke T, Geary M, et al. How safe is preterm operative vaginal delivery and which is the instrument of choice? J Perinat Med. 2012;41:57–60. Corcoran S, Clarke T, Geary M, et al. How safe is preterm operative vaginal delivery and which is the instrument of choice? J Perinat Med. 2012;41:57–60.
14.
go back to reference Johanson RB. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1999;2:cd000224. Johanson RB. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1999;2:cd000224.
15.
go back to reference Roberts IF, Stone M. Fetal hemorrhage: complication of vacuum extractor after fetal blood sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;132:109.PubMed Roberts IF, Stone M. Fetal hemorrhage: complication of vacuum extractor after fetal blood sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;132:109.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Thiery M. Fetal hemorrhage following blood sampling and use of vacuum extractor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;134:231.PubMed Thiery M. Fetal hemorrhage following blood sampling and use of vacuum extractor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;134:231.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Bahl R, Murphy DJ, Strachan B. Non-technical skills for obstetricians conducting forceps and vacuum deliveries: qualitative analysis by interviews and video recordings. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;150(2):147–51.PubMedCrossRef Bahl R, Murphy DJ, Strachan B. Non-technical skills for obstetricians conducting forceps and vacuum deliveries: qualitative analysis by interviews and video recordings. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;150(2):147–51.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkens E, et al. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1709–14.PubMedCrossRef Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkens E, et al. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1709–14.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Al-Kadri H, Sabr Y, Al-Saif S, et al. Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal–neonatal complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:642–8.PubMedCrossRef Al-Kadri H, Sabr Y, Al-Saif S, et al. Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal–neonatal complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:642–8.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ezenagu LC, Kakaria R, Bofill JA. Sequential use of instruments at operative vaginal delivery: is it safe? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:1446–9.PubMedCrossRef Ezenagu LC, Kakaria R, Bofill JA. Sequential use of instruments at operative vaginal delivery: is it safe? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:1446–9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Murphy DJ, Macleod M, Bahl R, et al. A cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of sequential instruments at operative vaginal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;156(1):41–5.PubMedCrossRef Murphy DJ, Macleod M, Bahl R, et al. A cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of sequential instruments at operative vaginal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;156(1):41–5.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gardella C, Taylor M, Benedetti T, et al. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:896–902.PubMedCrossRef Gardella C, Taylor M, Benedetti T, et al. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:896–902.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick M, Behan M, O’Connell PR, et al. Randomised clinical trial to assess anal sphincter function following forceps or vacuum assisted vaginal delivery. BJOG. 2003;110:424–9.PubMedCrossRef Fitzpatrick M, Behan M, O’Connell PR, et al. Randomised clinical trial to assess anal sphincter function following forceps or vacuum assisted vaginal delivery. BJOG. 2003;110:424–9.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Macleod M, Strachan B, Bahl R, et al. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery. BJOG. 2008;115(13):1688–94.PubMedCrossRef Macleod M, Strachan B, Bahl R, et al. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery. BJOG. 2008;115(13):1688–94.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Johanson RB, Heycock E, Carter J, et al. Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: five-year follow up of a randomised controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:544–9.PubMedCrossRef Johanson RB, Heycock E, Carter J, et al. Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: five-year follow up of a randomised controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:544–9.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Langeron A. Failed forceps extraction: risk factors and maternal and neonatal morbidity. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2012;41(4):333–8.CrossRef Langeron A. Failed forceps extraction: risk factors and maternal and neonatal morbidity. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2012;41(4):333–8.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Dupuis O. Does forceps training on a birth simulator allow obstetricians to improve forceps blade placement? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159(2):305–9.PubMedCrossRef Dupuis O. Does forceps training on a birth simulator allow obstetricians to improve forceps blade placement? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159(2):305–9.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Thomas J, Paranjothy S. National sentinel caesarean section audit report. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit; 2001. Thomas J, Paranjothy S. National sentinel caesarean section audit report. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit; 2001.
30.
go back to reference Hankins GD, Uckan E, Rowe TF, et al. Forceps and vacuum delivery: expectations of residency and fellowship training program directors. Am J Perinatol. 1999;16:23–8.PubMedCrossRef Hankins GD, Uckan E, Rowe TF, et al. Forceps and vacuum delivery: expectations of residency and fellowship training program directors. Am J Perinatol. 1999;16:23–8.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Putta VL, Spencer PJ. Assisted vaginal delivery using the vacuum extractor. Am Fam Phys. 2000;62(6):1316–20. Putta VL, Spencer PJ. Assisted vaginal delivery using the vacuum extractor. Am Fam Phys. 2000;62(6):1316–20.
32.
go back to reference DiMatteo MR, Morton SC, Lepper HS, et al. Cesarean childbirth and psychosocial outcomes: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 1996;15:303–14.PubMedCrossRef DiMatteo MR, Morton SC, Lepper HS, et al. Cesarean childbirth and psychosocial outcomes: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 1996;15:303–14.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Murphy DJ, Stirrat GM, Heron J, et al. The relationship between caesarean section and subfertility in a population-based sample of 14,541 pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1914–7.PubMedCrossRef Murphy DJ, Stirrat GM, Heron J, et al. The relationship between caesarean section and subfertility in a population-based sample of 14,541 pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1914–7.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Chow SL, Johnson CM, Anderson TD, et al. Rotational delivery with Kielland’s forceps. Med J Aust. 1987;146:616–9.PubMed Chow SL, Johnson CM, Anderson TD, et al. Rotational delivery with Kielland’s forceps. Med J Aust. 1987;146:616–9.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy DJ. Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study. BMJ. 2004;328:311–6.PubMedCrossRef Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy DJ. Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study. BMJ. 2004;328:311–6.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Murphy DJ, Pope C, Frost J, et al. Women’s views on the impact of operative delivery in the second stage of labour—qualitative study. BMJ. 2003;327:1132–5.PubMedCrossRef Murphy DJ, Pope C, Frost J, et al. Women’s views on the impact of operative delivery in the second stage of labour—qualitative study. BMJ. 2003;327:1132–5.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is it Time to Rejuvenate the Forceps?
Authors
Sanchila Talukdar
Nikhil Purandare
Sam Coulter-Smith
Michael Geary
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-013-0465-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 4/2013 Go to the issue