Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Critical Care 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Letter

Is it time to consider visual feedback systems the gold standard for chest compression skill acquisition?

Authors: Andrea Cortegiani, Vincenzo Russotto, Enrico Baldi, Enrico Contri, Santi Maurizio Raineri, Antonino Giarratano

Published in: Critical Care | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

High-quality chest compressions are pivotal for improving survival from cardiac arrest. The rate and depth of compressions, chest recoil and hand position are important parameters affecting the overall quality of chest compressions, which is correlated with blood flow and oxygen delivery to the heart and brain and, consequently, with rate of ROSC and neurologically intact survival at hospital discharge [1]. During the last decade, some automated feedback devices have been investigated to improve CPR performance during cardiac arrest [2]. However, the applicability of these systems on a large scale is questionable and more attention has been focused on FS for training with unclear effects [3]. …
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Lin S, Scales DC. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and beyond: the need to improve real-time feedback and physiologic monitoring. Crit Care. 2016;20:182.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lin S, Scales DC. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and beyond: the need to improve real-time feedback and physiologic monitoring. Crit Care. 2016;20:182.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Zapletal B, Greif R, Stumpf D, Nierscher FJ, Frantal S, Haugk M, Ruetzler K, Schlimp C, Fischer H. Comparing three CPR feedback devices and standard BLS in a single rescuer scenario: a randomised simulation study. Resuscitation. 2014;85:560–6.CrossRefPubMed Zapletal B, Greif R, Stumpf D, Nierscher FJ, Frantal S, Haugk M, Ruetzler K, Schlimp C, Fischer H. Comparing three CPR feedback devices and standard BLS in a single rescuer scenario: a randomised simulation study. Resuscitation. 2014;85:560–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Baldi E, Cornara S, Contri E, Epis F, Fina D, Zelaschi B, Dossena C, Fichtner F, Tonani M, Di Maggio M, Zambaiti E, Somaschini A. Real-time visual feedback during training improves laypersons’ CPR quality: a randomized controlled manikin study. CJEM. 2017;1–8 Baldi E, Cornara S, Contri E, Epis F, Fina D, Zelaschi B, Dossena C, Fichtner F, Tonani M, Di Maggio M, Zambaiti E, Somaschini A. Real-time visual feedback during training improves laypersons’ CPR quality: a randomized controlled manikin study. CJEM. 2017;1–8
5.
go back to reference Cortegiani A, Russotto V, Montalto F, Iozzo P, Meschis R, Pugliesi M, Mariano D, Benenati V, Raineri SM, Gregoretti C, Giarratano A. Use of a real-time training software (Laerdal QCPR(R)) compared to instructor-based feedback for high-quality chest compressions acquisition in secondary school students: a randomized trial. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0169591.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cortegiani A, Russotto V, Montalto F, Iozzo P, Meschis R, Pugliesi M, Mariano D, Benenati V, Raineri SM, Gregoretti C, Giarratano A. Use of a real-time training software (Laerdal QCPR(R)) compared to instructor-based feedback for high-quality chest compressions acquisition in secondary school students: a randomized trial. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0169591.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Is it time to consider visual feedback systems the gold standard for chest compression skill acquisition?
Authors
Andrea Cortegiani
Vincenzo Russotto
Enrico Baldi
Enrico Contri
Santi Maurizio Raineri
Antonino Giarratano
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Critical Care / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1740-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Critical Care 1/2017 Go to the issue