Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Is children’s weight a public health or a private family issue? A qualitative analysis of online discussion about National Child Measurement Programme feedback in England

Authors: B. E. Kovacs, F. B. Gillison, J. C. Barnett

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The National Child Measurement Programme (NCMP) is a child weight monitoring system in England, taking place in the first and final years of primary school. Many local authorities consider it important to inform parents if their child is overweight, and do so by letter alongside the offer of support and advice. Such letters have been met with mixed reactions from parents, but research seeking to better understand parents’ responses is often limited by reliance on survey data and low participation rates. This study aimed to collect a broad variety of perspectives on the programme by analyzing views expressed in parent-to-parent discussions posted online.

Methods

UK-based online parenting fora were used to identify discussion threads based around the NCMP between 2010 and 2017. Thirty-one discussion threads from two parent fora were identified. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes in these data.

Results

The primary themes identified related to (1) the legitimacy of feedback and judgement from health professionals, (2) the relative importance of collecting population level data above individual preferences, and (3) risks versus benefits of having conversations with children about weight. Most threads adopted an ‘argument, counter-argument’ format, providing two sides to each issue raised. Information and opinions consistent with public health messages were frequently provided, such as how data are used, that feedback is intended to be helpful, and the importance of collecting national data. There was little evidence of individual parents shifting their views in response to others’ arguments.

Conclusions

This study provides novel insight into peer-to-peer debates about the NCMP, including the arguments parents find convincing and acceptable for and against a national programme to weigh children and provide feedback to parents about their weight. Online fora were used as an opportunity to express criticism or distress, but also to seek advice from peers regarding concerns about whether or not to opt-out. Thus, both general issues related to the legitimacy of population screening and outcomes for individual children were of concern to parents.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Falconer CL, Park MH, Croker H, Skow Á, Black J, Saxena S, et al. The benefits and harms of providing parents with weight feedback as part of the national child measurement programme: a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):1.CrossRef Falconer CL, Park MH, Croker H, Skow Á, Black J, Saxena S, et al. The benefits and harms of providing parents with weight feedback as part of the national child measurement programme: a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):1.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Franklin K, Lowry C. Computer mediated focus group sessions: naturalistic inquiry in a networked environment. Qual Res. 2001;1:169–84.CrossRef Franklin K, Lowry C. Computer mediated focus group sessions: naturalistic inquiry in a networked environment. Qual Res. 2001;1:169–84.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fraser LK, Edwards KL. The association between the geography of fast food outlets and childhood obesity rates in Leeds, UK. Health Place. 2010;16(6):1124–8.PubMedCrossRef Fraser LK, Edwards KL. The association between the geography of fast food outlets and childhood obesity rates in Leeds, UK. Health Place. 2010;16(6):1124–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gillison FB, Lorenc AB, Sleddens EF, Williams SL, Atkinson L. Can it be harmful for parents to talk to their child about their weight? A meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2016;93:135–46.PubMedCrossRef Gillison FB, Lorenc AB, Sleddens EF, Williams SL, Atkinson L. Can it be harmful for parents to talk to their child about their weight? A meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2016;93:135–46.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gillison F, Beck F, Lewitt J. Exploring the basis for parents’ negative reactions to being informed that their child is overweight. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17:987–97.PubMedCrossRef Gillison F, Beck F, Lewitt J. Exploring the basis for parents’ negative reactions to being informed that their child is overweight. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17:987–97.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Goisis A, Sacker A, Kelly Y. Why are poorer children at higher risk of obesity and overweight? A UK cohort study. Eur J Public Health. 2015;26(1):7–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Goisis A, Sacker A, Kelly Y. Why are poorer children at higher risk of obesity and overweight? A UK cohort study. Eur J Public Health. 2015;26(1):7–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hewson C, Yule P, Laurent D, Vogel C. Internet research methods. London: Sage; 2003.CrossRef Hewson C, Yule P, Laurent D, Vogel C. Internet research methods. London: Sage; 2003.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Jones AR, Parkinson KN, Drewett RF, Hyland RM, Pearce MS, Adamson AJ. Parental perceptions of weight status in children: the Gateshead Millennium Study. Int. J. Obes. 2011;35(7):953.PubMedCrossRef Jones AR, Parkinson KN, Drewett RF, Hyland RM, Pearce MS, Adamson AJ. Parental perceptions of weight status in children: the Gateshead Millennium Study. Int. J. Obes. 2011;35(7):953.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lake J. Commentary: the development of surveillance and screening for childhood obesity in the UK. Clin Public Health. 2009;19(1):3–10. Lake J. Commentary: the development of surveillance and screening for childhood obesity in the UK. Clin Public Health. 2009;19(1):3–10.
19.
go back to reference Mitchell JT, Sweitzer MM, Tunno AM, Kollins SH, McClernon FJ. “I use weed for my ADHD”: a qualitative analysis of online forum discussions on cannabis use and ADHD. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0156614.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mitchell JT, Sweitzer MM, Tunno AM, Kollins SH, McClernon FJ. “I use weed for my ADHD”: a qualitative analysis of online forum discussions on cannabis use and ADHD. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0156614.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Nnyanzi LA, Summerbell CD, Ells L, Shucksmith J. Parental response to a letter reporting child overweight measured as part of a routine national programme in England: results from interviews with parents. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):846.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Nnyanzi LA, Summerbell CD, Ells L, Shucksmith J. Parental response to a letter reporting child overweight measured as part of a routine national programme in England: results from interviews with parents. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):846.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Prina S, Royer H. The importance of parental knowledge: evidence from weight report cards in Mexico. J Health Econ. 2014;37:232–47.PubMedCrossRef Prina S, Royer H. The importance of parental knowledge: evidence from weight report cards in Mexico. J Health Econ. 2014;37:232–47.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Serdula MK, Ivery D, Coates RJ, Freedman DS, Williamson DF, Byers T. Do obese children become obese adults? A review of the literature. Prev Med. 1993;22:167–77.PubMedCrossRef Serdula MK, Ivery D, Coates RJ, Freedman DS, Williamson DF, Byers T. Do obese children become obese adults? A review of the literature. Prev Med. 1993;22:167–77.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Sleddens EFC, Gerards SMPL, Thijs C, De Vries NK, Kremers SPJ. General parenting, childhood overweight and obesity-inducing behaviors. A review. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6:e12–27.PubMedCrossRef Sleddens EFC, Gerards SMPL, Thijs C, De Vries NK, Kremers SPJ. General parenting, childhood overweight and obesity-inducing behaviors. A review. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6:e12–27.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Syrad H, Falconer C, Cooke L, Saxena S, Kessel AS, Viner R, et al. ‘Health and happiness is more important than weight’: a qualitative investigation of the views of parents receiving written feedback on their child's weight as part of the National Child Measurement Programme. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015;28:47–55.PubMedCrossRef Syrad H, Falconer C, Cooke L, Saxena S, Kessel AS, Viner R, et al. ‘Health and happiness is more important than weight’: a qualitative investigation of the views of parents receiving written feedback on their child's weight as part of the National Child Measurement Programme. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015;28:47–55.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Wickins-Drazilova D, Williams G. The ethics of evaluating obesity intervention studies on children. Int J Obes. 2011;35:S24–9.CrossRef Wickins-Drazilova D, Williams G. The ethics of evaluating obesity intervention studies on children. Int J Obes. 2011;35:S24–9.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Yardley L. Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychol Health. 2000;15(2):215–28.CrossRef Yardley L. Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychol Health. 2000;15(2):215–28.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is children’s weight a public health or a private family issue? A qualitative analysis of online discussion about National Child Measurement Programme feedback in England
Authors
B. E. Kovacs
F. B. Gillison
J. C. Barnett
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6214-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Public Health 1/2018 Go to the issue