Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 1/2015

01-02-2015 | Original Paper

IOP agreement between I-Care TA01 rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer in eyes with and without glaucoma

Authors: Gautam Sinha, Shikha Gupta, Shreyas Temkar, Veena Pandey, Ramanjit Sihota, Tanuj Dada

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

To analyze correlation of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement between new rebound tonometer (RBT) I-Care TA01 and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). One hundred eighty-five eyes of 185 subjects presenting with glaucoma or cataract were enrolled in the study. In all patients, IOP was obtained by an ophthalmologist using I-Care TA01 and GAT. IOP between the two were compared at range of 8–15, 16–21, and >22 mmHg and difference was considered as significant at p < 0.05 (t test). Bland–Altman analysis tested agreement between instruments overall and for each subgroup of patients with glaucoma or no glaucoma (cataract only). Of 185 patients, 86 had glaucoma; 99 did not. Mean age of patients was 55.77 ± 14.46 years; with no difference between the two subgroups (p = 0.12). There was no significant difference in mean IOP between the two tonometers at IOP between 8–15 mmHg (p = 0.097) and 16–21 mmHg (p = 0.51). However, a significant difference was observed between the two at IOP > 22 mmHg (p = 0.023) with mean GAT (24.8 mmHg) being higher than mean RBT (23.16 mmHg). Overall, there was no difference between the two (p = 0.59) and they had a high correlation (Pearson correlation r = 0.815; p = 0.01). The mean difference between the two was 0.1 (95 % agreement limits: UL +6 (1.96SD), LL −5.8 (−1.96SD)), in patients with no glaucoma was 0.091 (95 % AL: UL +4.8 (1.96SD), LL −4.6 (−1.96SD)), and in patients with glaucoma was 0.151 (95 % AL: UL +7.25 (1.96SD), LL −6.9 (−1.96SD)). RBT I-Care TA01 and Goldmann tonometer cannot be used interchangeably due to large limits of agreement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chihara E (2008) Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data. Surv Ophthalmol. 53(3):203–218PubMedCrossRef Chihara E (2008) Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data. Surv Ophthalmol. 53(3):203–218PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38(1):1-30. Review Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38(1):1-30. Review
3.
go back to reference Kontiola AI (1997) A new electromechanical method for measuring intraocular pressure. Doc Ophthalmol 93:265–276CrossRef Kontiola AI (1997) A new electromechanical method for measuring intraocular pressure. Doc Ophthalmol 93:265–276CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Leske MC (1983) The epidemiology of open-angle glaucoma: a review. Am J Epidemiol 118:166–191PubMed Leske MC (1983) The epidemiology of open-angle glaucoma: a review. Am J Epidemiol 118:166–191PubMed
5.
go back to reference García-Resúa C, González-Meijome JM, Gilino J, Yebra-Pimentel E (2006) Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes. Optom Vis Sci 83(2):102–107PubMedCrossRef García-Resúa C, González-Meijome JM, Gilino J, Yebra-Pimentel E (2006) Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes. Optom Vis Sci 83(2):102–107PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Vandewalle E, Vandenbroeck S, Stalmans I, Zeyen T (2009) Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 19:783–789PubMed Vandewalle E, Vandenbroeck S, Stalmans I, Zeyen T (2009) Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 19:783–789PubMed
7.
go back to reference Sahin A, Niyaz L, Yildirim N (2007) Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 35:335–339CrossRef Sahin A, Niyaz L, Yildirim N (2007) Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 35:335–339CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A, Garcia-Sanchez J (2005) Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:4578–4580PubMedCrossRef Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A, Garcia-Sanchez J (2005) Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:4578–4580PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Iliev ME, Goldblum D, Katsoulis K, Amstutz C, Frueh B (2006) Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol 90(7):833–835PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Iliev ME, Goldblum D, Katsoulis K, Amstutz C, Frueh B (2006) Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol 90(7):833–835PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Miani F et al (2011) Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty. Eye (Lond) 25:642–650CrossRef Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Miani F et al (2011) Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty. Eye (Lond) 25:642–650CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sakamoto M, Kanamori A, Fujihara M et al (2014) Assessment of IcareONE rebound tonometer for self-measuring intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol 92(3):243–248PubMedCrossRef Sakamoto M, Kanamori A, Fujihara M et al (2014) Assessment of IcareONE rebound tonometer for self-measuring intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol 92(3):243–248PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dahlmann-Noor AH, Puertas R, Tabasa-Lim S et al (2013) Comparison of handheld rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with glaucoma: a cohort study. BMJ Open 3(4):e001788PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dahlmann-Noor AH, Puertas R, Tabasa-Lim S et al (2013) Comparison of handheld rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with glaucoma: a cohort study. BMJ Open 3(4):e001788PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Saenz-Frances F, Vizzeri G, Fernandez-Vidal A, Mendez-Hernandez C, Garcia-Sanchez J (2009) Comparison of rebound tonometer and Goldmann handheld applanation tonometer in congenital glaucoma. J Glaucoma 18(1):49–52PubMedCrossRef Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Saenz-Frances F, Vizzeri G, Fernandez-Vidal A, Mendez-Hernandez C, Garcia-Sanchez J (2009) Comparison of rebound tonometer and Goldmann handheld applanation tonometer in congenital glaucoma. J Glaucoma 18(1):49–52PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lambert SR, Melia M, Buffenn AN et al (2013) Rebound tonometry in children: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 120(4):e21–e27PubMedCrossRef Lambert SR, Melia M, Buffenn AN et al (2013) Rebound tonometry in children: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 120(4):e21–e27PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Grigorian F, Grigorian AP, Olitsky SE (2012) The use of the iCare tonometer reduced the need for anesthesia to measure intraocular pressure in children. J AAPOS 16(6):508–510PubMedCrossRef Grigorian F, Grigorian AP, Olitsky SE (2012) The use of the iCare tonometer reduced the need for anesthesia to measure intraocular pressure in children. J AAPOS 16(6):508–510PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
IOP agreement between I-Care TA01 rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer in eyes with and without glaucoma
Authors
Gautam Sinha
Shikha Gupta
Shreyas Temkar
Veena Pandey
Ramanjit Sihota
Tanuj Dada
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-014-0026-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

International Ophthalmology 1/2015 Go to the issue