Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Ionizing Radiation | Statement

Improving justification of medical exposures using ionising radiation: considerations and approaches from the European Society of Radiology

Authors: Steve Ebdon-Jackson, Guy Frija, European Society of Radiology

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

This discussion paper has been produced within the context of the European Society of Radiology EuroSafe Imaging initiative and considers primarily the issues and challenges associated with justification of medical exposures using ionising radiation for individual patient diagnostic imaging procedures. It addresses both regulatory requirements and practical considerations and discusses approaches that are intended to improve justification.

Available only for authorised users

Council Directive 97/43/Euratom of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure, and repealing Directive 84/466/Euratom Off J Eur Commun No L180 (1997), 30 June 1997. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/aa7564fa-fd07-4872-943c-66df8f4f1099/language-en

European Commission. Medical Radiation Exposure of the European Population (Part 1). Radiation Protection Publication no 180. Luxembourg: European Commission, DG TREN; 2014. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/RP180.pdf

Mettler FA, Wiest PW, Locken J, Kelsey CA (2000) CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/20/4/301CrossRefPubMed

Contract ENER/17/NUCL/SI2.755660 European Study on Medical, Industrial and Research Applications of Nuclear and Radiation Technology: Final Report. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/ec-01-08-_d_-_2018-07-30_-_final_report_for_publication.pdf

1990 NRPB-RCR Patient dose reduction in diagnostic radiology: a report of the Royal College of Radiologists and the National Radiological Protection Board. In Documents of the NRPB. 1.NRPB, Chilton 1990

International Atomic Energy Agency, Justification of Medical Exposure in Diagnostic Imaging. Proceedings of an international workshop held in Brussels, Belgium, 2–4 September 2009 proceedings series (2012) ISBN:978-92-0-121110-1

Bouëtté A, Karoussou-Schreiner A, Ducou Le Pointe H et al (2019) National audit on the appropriateness of CT and MRI examinations in Luxembourg. Insights Imaging 10:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0731-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hillman BJ, Joseph CA, Mabry MR, Sunshine JH, Kennedy SD, Noether M (1990) Frequency and costs of diagnostic imaging in office practice—a comparison of self-referring and radiologist-referring physicians. N Engl J Med 332:1604–1608

Levin DC, Rao VM (2004) Turf wars in radiology: the over utilization of imaging resulting from self-referral. J Am Coll Radiol 1:169–172CrossRef

10.

Malone J, Guleria R, Craven C et al (2012) Justification of diagnostic medical exposures, some practical issues: report of an international atomic energy agency consultation. Br J Radiol 85:523–538. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/42893576

11.

Call B (2016) International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and World Health Organization (WHO). Bonn call for action: 10 actions to improve radiation protection in medicine in the Next Decade. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria. https://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/medical_exposure/bonncallforaction2014.pdf?ua=1

12.

Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122 Euratom Off J Eur Commun No L13 (2014), 5 December 2013. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2013/59/oj

13.

World Medical Association (2018). Declaration of Geneva. https://wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-geneva

14.

Malone J, del Rosario Perez M, Friberg EG et al (2016) Justification of CT for individual health assessment of asymptomatic persons: a world health organization consultation. J Am CollRadiol 12(2):158–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2016.07.020

15.

HERCA: getting the right image for my patient. https://www.herca.org/highlight_item.asp?p=13&itemID=23

16.

MBUR 1 RCR Working Party (1989) Making the best use of a department of radiology: Guidelines for Doctors. Royal College of Radiologists, London

17.

Guide du Bon Usage des examens d'imagerie médicale. https://gbu.radiologie.fr/

18.

Royal College of Radiologists Working Party (1993) Influence of Royal College of Radiologists’ guidelines on referral from general practice. BMJ 306(6870):110–111. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6870.110CrossRef

19.

Oakeshott P, Kerry SM, Williams JE (1994) Randomized controlled trial of the effect of the Royal College of Radiologists’ guidelines on general practitioners’ referrals for radiographic examination. Br J Gen Pract 44(382):197–200PubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Remedios D, Hierath M, Ashford N et al (2014a) European survey on imaging referral guidelines. Insights Imaging 5:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0300-6CrossRefPubMed

21.

Remedios D, Hierath M, Ashford N et al (2014b) Imaging referral guidelines in Europe: now and in the future—EC referral guidelines workshop proceedings. Insights Imaging 5:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0299-8CrossRefPubMed

22.

Almen et al. National Survey on Justification of CT examinations in Sweden, SSM 2009–3. https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/40/029/40029225.pdf?r=1

23.

European Commission (2000) Referral guidelines for imaging. Radiation protection publication no 118. European Commission, DG TREN, Luxembourg

24.

Blachar A, Tal S, Mandel A et al (2006) Preauthorization of CT and MRI examinations: assessment of a managed care preauthorization program based on the ACR appropriateness criteria and the royal college of radiology guidelines. J Am CollRadiol 3(11):851–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2006.04.005CrossRef

25.

Brkljacic B, Stahlbrandt H (2018) ESR iGuide poster. EuroSafe Imaging 2018/ESI-0089. https://doi.org/10.1594/esi2018/ESI-0089

26.

European Commission. European Commission guidelines on clinical audit for medical radiological practices (diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine and radiotherapy). Radiation protection publication no. 159. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/159.pdf

27.

Esperanto: ESR guide to clinical audit in radiology and the ESR clinical audit tool. https://www.myesr.org/media/4735

28.

Godwin R, de Lacey G, Manhire A (eds) (1996) Clinical audit in radiology: 100+ recipes. The Royal College of Radiologists, London

29.

Implementing External Clinical Audits in Radiological Practices: The Experience in Finland Volume 9—Issue 4, 2009—Cover Story: Clinical Audit in the European Union, HealthManagement.org

30.

The Royal College of Radiologists. AuditLive. https://www.rcr.ac.uk/clinical-radiology/audit-and-qi/auditlive

31.

ENER/D3/2020-74 European Co-ordinated Action on Improving Justification of computed tomography. Tender specifications. https://etendering.ted.europa.eu/document/document-old-versions.html?docId=74753

32.

HERCA: inspection campaign to assess patient radiation protection in diagnostic radiology (2016) https://www.herca.org/highlight_item.asp?itemID=16

Title: Improving justification of medical exposures using ionising radiation: considerations and approaches from the European Society of Radiology
Authors: Steve Ebdon-Jackson
Guy Frija
European Society of Radiology
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords: Ionizing Radiation
Radiation Protection
Published in: Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00940-0

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Improving justification of medical exposures using ionising radiation: considerations and approaches from the European Society of Radiology

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

A pictorial review of the utility of CEUS in thoracic biopsies

The European Society of Head and Neck Radiology Mentoring Programme: development and feedback during the first phase of the initiative

Emerging role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Castleman disease: a review

Quantitative analysis of metal artifact reduction in total hip arthroplasty using virtual monochromatic imaging and orthopedic metal artifact reduction, a phantom study

Dual-energy CT angiography reveals high prevalence of perfusion defects unrelated to pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 lesions

Rhino-orbito-cerebral Mucormycosis: Pictorial Review