Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 2/2015

01-04-2015 | Review Article

Involvement of Patients with Lung and Gynecological Cancer and Their Relatives in Psychosocial Cancer Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review

Authors: Bente Hoeck, Loni Ledderer, Helle Ploug Hansen

Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Getting cancer is stressful for most patients and their relatives, and research has shown that psychosocial support is needed. Still, cancer care fails to appropriately address psychosocial problems associated with cancer. Research on this topic is often seen from the perspective of either the patient or the relative, even though it is suggested that psychosocial support is beneficial for the patient and the relative as a pair. Furthermore, research on the need for psychosocial support rarely involves patients with gynecological and lung cancer and their relatives, even though they often suffer from isolation and stigmatization. The aim of this review was therefore to summarize knowledge about psychosocial support with regard to individual needs, involvement of significant others, and providers of psychosocial support focusing on this specific population.

Method

A narrative review procedure was chosen. This method is a specific kind of review, which summarizes, explains, and interprets evidence on a selected topic. The review process was structured according to typical scholarly articles with attention to the search and review process.

Results

A total of 16 studies were included in the review. The studies were divided into two main categories: (1) studies focusing on needs for psychosocial support; and (2) studies focusing on interventions. The needs studies were analyzed, and three themes emerged: the needs of the patient and the significant other across the cancer trajectory; the needs of the significant other as a carer; and needs and ongoing and tailored support. The intervention studies were directed toward the patient and the relative, the patient, or the relative. Five interventions comprising various forms of support that were purely supportive and were carried out by healthcare professionals were identified.

Conclusion

There were overlaps between the needs of the patient and the relative, but there were also distinctive characteristics of the needs in the two groups. The needs varied during the cancer trajectory, and we therefore recommend that support be offered continuously. It was also evident that the relatives should be involved in the patients’ care and that the involvement was beneficial for both the patient and the relative.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Galway K, Black A, Cantwell M, Cardwell CR, Mills M, Donnelly M. Psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life and emotional wellbeing for recently diagnosed cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD007064.PubMed Galway K, Black A, Cantwell M, Cardwell CR, Mills M, Donnelly M. Psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life and emotional wellbeing for recently diagnosed cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD007064.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Seibaek L, Petersen LK, Blaakaer J, Hounsgaard L. Hoping for the best, preparing for the worst: the lived experiences of women undergoing ovarian cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012;21(3):360–71.CrossRef Seibaek L, Petersen LK, Blaakaer J, Hounsgaard L. Hoping for the best, preparing for the worst: the lived experiences of women undergoing ovarian cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012;21(3):360–71.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Johnson RL, Gold MA, Wyche KF. Distress in women with gynecologic cancer. Psychooncology. 2010;19(6):665–8.PubMedCrossRef Johnson RL, Gold MA, Wyche KF. Distress in women with gynecologic cancer. Psychooncology. 2010;19(6):665–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ka’opua LS, Gotay CC, Boehm PS. Spiritually based resources in adaptation to long-term prostate cancer survival: perspectives of elderly wives. Health Soc Work. 2007;32(1):29–39.PubMedCrossRef Ka’opua LS, Gotay CC, Boehm PS. Spiritually based resources in adaptation to long-term prostate cancer survival: perspectives of elderly wives. Health Soc Work. 2007;32(1):29–39.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Scott JL, Halford WK, Ward BG. United we stand? The effects of a couple–coping intervention on adjustment to early stage breast or gynecological cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72(6):1122–35.PubMedCrossRef Scott JL, Halford WK, Ward BG. United we stand? The effects of a couple–coping intervention on adjustment to early stage breast or gynecological cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72(6):1122–35.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Adler NE, Page AEK. Cancer care for the whole patient: meeting psychosocial health needs. Washington: National Academies; 2008. Adler NE, Page AEK. Cancer care for the whole patient: meeting psychosocial health needs. Washington: National Academies; 2008.
7.
go back to reference Dalton SO, Bidstrup PE, Johansen C. Rehabilitation of cancer patients: needed, but how? Acta Oncol. 2011;50(2):163–6.PubMedCrossRef Dalton SO, Bidstrup PE, Johansen C. Rehabilitation of cancer patients: needed, but how? Acta Oncol. 2011;50(2):163–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Thorsen L, Gjerset GM, Loge JH, Kiserud CE, Skovlund E, Flotten T, et al. Cancer patients’ needs for rehabilitation services. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(2):212–22.PubMedCrossRef Thorsen L, Gjerset GM, Loge JH, Kiserud CE, Skovlund E, Flotten T, et al. Cancer patients’ needs for rehabilitation services. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(2):212–22.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ernstmann N, Neumann M, Ommen O, Galushko M, Wirtz M, Voltz R, et al. Determinants and implications of cancer patients’ psychosocial needs. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(11):1417–23.PubMedCrossRef Ernstmann N, Neumann M, Ommen O, Galushko M, Wirtz M, Voltz R, et al. Determinants and implications of cancer patients’ psychosocial needs. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(11):1417–23.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Angen MJ, Simpson JS, Macrae H, Hundleby M. Impact of a residential psychosocial program for cancer patients: a focus group investigation. Adv Mind Body Med. 2003;19(3–4):24–34.PubMed Angen MJ, Simpson JS, Macrae H, Hundleby M. Impact of a residential psychosocial program for cancer patients: a focus group investigation. Adv Mind Body Med. 2003;19(3–4):24–34.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Eriksson E, Lauri S. Informational and emotional support for cancer patients’ relatives. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2000;9(1):8–15.CrossRef Eriksson E, Lauri S. Informational and emotional support for cancer patients’ relatives. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2000;9(1):8–15.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Given BA, Northouse L. Who cares for family caregivers of patients with cancer? Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2011;15(5):451–2.PubMedCrossRef Given BA, Northouse L. Who cares for family caregivers of patients with cancer? Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2011;15(5):451–2.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ellis J, Wagland R, Tishelman C, Williams ML, Bailey CD, Haines J, et al. Considerations in developing and delivering a nonpharmacological intervention for symptom management in lung cancer: the views of patients and informal caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012;44(6):831–42.PubMedCrossRef Ellis J, Wagland R, Tishelman C, Williams ML, Bailey CD, Haines J, et al. Considerations in developing and delivering a nonpharmacological intervention for symptom management in lung cancer: the views of patients and informal caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012;44(6):831–42.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sutton LB, Erlen JA. Effects of mutual dyad support on quality of life in women with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2006;29(6):488–98.PubMedCrossRef Sutton LB, Erlen JA. Effects of mutual dyad support on quality of life in women with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2006;29(6):488–98.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference McLean LM, Jones JM, Rydall AC, Walsh A, Esplen MJ, Zimmermann C, et al. A couples intervention for patients facing advanced cancer and their spouse caregivers: outcomes of a pilot study. Psychooncology. 2008;17(11):1152–6.PubMedCrossRef McLean LM, Jones JM, Rydall AC, Walsh A, Esplen MJ, Zimmermann C, et al. A couples intervention for patients facing advanced cancer and their spouse caregivers: outcomes of a pilot study. Psychooncology. 2008;17(11):1152–6.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Morgan MA, Small BJ, Donovan KA, Overcash J, McMillan S. Cancer patients with pain the spouse/partner relationship and quality of life. Cancer Nurs. 2011;34(1):13–23.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Morgan MA, Small BJ, Donovan KA, Overcash J, McMillan S. Cancer patients with pain the spouse/partner relationship and quality of life. Cancer Nurs. 2011;34(1):13–23.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chambers SK, Pinnock C, Lepore SJ, Hughes S, O’Connell DL. A systematic review of psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer and their partners. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85(2):e75–88.PubMedCrossRef Chambers SK, Pinnock C, Lepore SJ, Hughes S, O’Connell DL. A systematic review of psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer and their partners. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85(2):e75–88.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hagedoorn M, Dagan M, Puterman E, Hoff C, Meijerink WJ, DeLongis A, et al. Relationship satisfaction in couples confronted with colorectal cancer: the interplay of past and current spousal support. J Behav Med. 2011;34(4):288–97.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hagedoorn M, Dagan M, Puterman E, Hoff C, Meijerink WJ, DeLongis A, et al. Relationship satisfaction in couples confronted with colorectal cancer: the interplay of past and current spousal support. J Behav Med. 2011;34(4):288–97.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference La Cour K, Ledderer L, Hansen HP. “An arena for sharing”: exploring the joint involvement of patients and their relatives in a cancer rehabilitation study. Cancer Nurs. doi:10.1097/NCC.0000000000000149. (Epub 2014 May 14 [cited 2014 June 6]). La Cour K, Ledderer L, Hansen HP. “An arena for sharing”: exploring the joint involvement of patients and their relatives in a cancer rehabilitation study. Cancer Nurs. doi:10.​1097/​NCC.​0000000000000149​. (Epub 2014 May 14 [cited 2014 June 6]).
20.
go back to reference Ledderer L, La Cour K, Mogensen O, Jakobsen E, Depont CR, Kragstrup J, et al. Feasibility of a psychosocial rehabilitation intervention to enhance the involvement of relatives in cancer rehabilitation: pilot study for a randomized controlled trial. Patient. 2013;6(3):201–12.PubMedCrossRef Ledderer L, La Cour K, Mogensen O, Jakobsen E, Depont CR, Kragstrup J, et al. Feasibility of a psychosocial rehabilitation intervention to enhance the involvement of relatives in cancer rehabilitation: pilot study for a randomized controlled trial. Patient. 2013;6(3):201–12.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ledderer L, La Cour K, Hansen HP. Outcome of supportive talks in a hospital setting: insights from cancer patients and their relatives. Patient. 2014;7(2):219–29. Ledderer L, La Cour K, Hansen HP. Outcome of supportive talks in a hospital setting: insights from cancer patients and their relatives. Patient. 2014;7(2):219–29.
22.
go back to reference Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer; 2007. Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer; 2007.
23.
go back to reference Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park: Sage; 1988. Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park: Sage; 1988.
24.
go back to reference Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(Suppl 1):6–20.PubMedCrossRef Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(Suppl 1):6–20.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Haneline M. Understanding literature review designs. J Am Chiropr Assoc. 2007; 19–23. Haneline M. Understanding literature review designs. J Am Chiropr Assoc. 2007; 19–23.
26.
go back to reference Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones DR, Young B, Sutton AJ. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(1):45–53.PubMedCrossRef Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones DR, Young B, Sutton AJ. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(1):45–53.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Cooper HM. Research synthesis and meta-analysis. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2010. Cooper HM. Research synthesis and meta-analysis. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2010.
28.
go back to reference Paterson BL, Thorne S, Canam C, Jillings C. Meta-study of qualitative health research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2001. Paterson BL, Thorne S, Canam C, Jillings C. Meta-study of qualitative health research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2001.
29.
go back to reference Jones ML. Application of systematic review methods to qualitative research: practical issues. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(3):271–8.PubMedCrossRef Jones ML. Application of systematic review methods to qualitative research: practical issues. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(3):271–8.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research. Br Med J. 2000;320(7226):50–2.CrossRef Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research. Br Med J. 2000;320(7226):50–2.CrossRef
31.
32.
go back to reference Rolfe G. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53(3):304–10.PubMedCrossRef Rolfe G. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53(3):304–10.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Dixon-Woods M, Booth A, Sutton AJ. Synthesizing qualitative research: a review of published reports. Qual Res. 2007;7(3):375–422.CrossRef Dixon-Woods M, Booth A, Sutton AJ. Synthesizing qualitative research: a review of published reports. Qual Res. 2007;7(3):375–422.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Dixon-Woods M, Sutton A, Shaw R, Miller T, Smith J, Young B, et al. Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007;12(1):42–7.PubMedCrossRef Dixon-Woods M, Sutton A, Shaw R, Miller T, Smith J, Young B, et al. Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007;12(1):42–7.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Hansen HP, Lee A, van Randwijk CB. Patient aspects: a review of fifty-eight Danish HTA reports. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):330–6.PubMedCrossRef Hansen HP, Lee A, van Randwijk CB. Patient aspects: a review of fifty-eight Danish HTA reports. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):330–6.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Hoeck B. A clinically oriented and practice driven approach to metasynthesis: a worked example on “being critically ill in an ICU”. Aarhus: University of Aarhus; 2011. Hoeck B. A clinically oriented and practice driven approach to metasynthesis: a worked example on “being critically ill in an ICU”. Aarhus: University of Aarhus; 2011.
37.
go back to reference Hansen HP, Draborg E, Kristensen FB. Exploring qualitative research synthesis: the role of patients’ perspectives in health policy design and decision making. Patient. 2011;4(3):143–52.PubMedCrossRef Hansen HP, Draborg E, Kristensen FB. Exploring qualitative research synthesis: the role of patients’ perspectives in health policy design and decision making. Patient. 2011;4(3):143–52.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Evans D. Systematic reviews of interpretive research: interpretive data synthesis of processed data. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2002;20(2):22–6.PubMed Evans D. Systematic reviews of interpretive research: interpretive data synthesis of processed data. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2002;20(2):22–6.PubMed
39.
40.
go back to reference Akyuz A, Guvenc G, Ustunsoz A, Kaya T. Living with gynecologic cancer: experience of women and their partners. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2008;40(3):241–7.PubMedCrossRef Akyuz A, Guvenc G, Ustunsoz A, Kaya T. Living with gynecologic cancer: experience of women and their partners. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2008;40(3):241–7.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Badr H, Taylor CL. Social constraints and spousal communication in lung cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15(8):673–83.PubMedCrossRef Badr H, Taylor CL. Social constraints and spousal communication in lung cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15(8):673–83.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Hodgkinson K, Butow P, Hobbs KM, Wain G. After cancer: the unmet supportive care needs of survivors and their partners. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2007;25(4):89–104.PubMedCrossRef Hodgkinson K, Butow P, Hobbs KM, Wain G. After cancer: the unmet supportive care needs of survivors and their partners. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2007;25(4):89–104.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Illingworth N, Forbat L, Hubbard G, Kearney N. The importance of relationships in the experience of cancer: a re-working of the policy ideal of the whole-systems approach. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2010;14(1):23–8.PubMedCrossRef Illingworth N, Forbat L, Hubbard G, Kearney N. The importance of relationships in the experience of cancer: a re-working of the policy ideal of the whole-systems approach. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2010;14(1):23–8.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Krishnasamy M, Wells M, Wilkie E. Patients and carer experiences of care provision after a diagnosis of lung cancer in Scotland. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15(3):327–32.PubMedCrossRef Krishnasamy M, Wells M, Wilkie E. Patients and carer experiences of care provision after a diagnosis of lung cancer in Scotland. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15(3):327–32.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Griffiths J, Willard C, Burgess A, Amir Z, Luker K. Meeting the ongoing needs of survivors of rarer cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2007;11(5):434–41.PubMedCrossRef Griffiths J, Willard C, Burgess A, Amir Z, Luker K. Meeting the ongoing needs of survivors of rarer cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2007;11(5):434–41.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Mikkelsen TH, Sondergaard J, Jensen AB, Olesen F. Cancer rehabilitation: psychosocial rehabilitation needs after discharge from hospital? Scan J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(4):216–21.CrossRef Mikkelsen TH, Sondergaard J, Jensen AB, Olesen F. Cancer rehabilitation: psychosocial rehabilitation needs after discharge from hospital? Scan J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(4):216–21.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Koldjeski D, Kirkpatrick MK, Everett L, Brown S, Swanson M. The ovarian cancer journey of families the first postdiagnostic year. Cancer Nurs. 2007;30(3):232–42.PubMedCrossRef Koldjeski D, Kirkpatrick MK, Everett L, Brown S, Swanson M. The ovarian cancer journey of families the first postdiagnostic year. Cancer Nurs. 2007;30(3):232–42.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Carlsson ME, Strang PM. Educational support programme for gynaecological cancer patients and their families. Acta Oncol. 1998;37(3):269–75.PubMedCrossRef Carlsson ME, Strang PM. Educational support programme for gynaecological cancer patients and their families. Acta Oncol. 1998;37(3):269–75.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Cox A, Bull E, Cockle-Hearne J, Knibb W, Potter C, Faithfull S. Nurse led telephone follow up in ovarian cancer: a psychosocial perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12(5):412–7.PubMedCrossRef Cox A, Bull E, Cockle-Hearne J, Knibb W, Potter C, Faithfull S. Nurse led telephone follow up in ovarian cancer: a psychosocial perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12(5):412–7.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Pistrang N, Jay Z, Gessler S, Barker C. Telephone peer support for women with gynaecological cancer: recipients’ perspectives. Psychooncology. 2012;21(10):1082–90.PubMedCrossRef Pistrang N, Jay Z, Gessler S, Barker C. Telephone peer support for women with gynaecological cancer: recipients’ perspectives. Psychooncology. 2012;21(10):1082–90.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Walker LM, Bischoff TF, Robinson JW. Supportive expressive group therapy for women with advanced ovarian cancer. Int J Group Psychother. 2010;60(3):407–27.PubMedCrossRef Walker LM, Bischoff TF, Robinson JW. Supportive expressive group therapy for women with advanced ovarian cancer. Int J Group Psychother. 2010;60(3):407–27.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Sekse RJ, Blaaka G, Buestad I, Tengesdal E, Paulsen A, Vika M. Education and counselling group intervention for women treated for gynaecological cancer: does it help? Scand J Caring Sci. 2014;28(1):112–21.PubMedCrossRef Sekse RJ, Blaaka G, Buestad I, Tengesdal E, Paulsen A, Vika M. Education and counselling group intervention for women treated for gynaecological cancer: does it help? Scand J Caring Sci. 2014;28(1):112–21.PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Nissim R, Freeman E, Lo C, Zimmermann C, Gagliese L, Rydall A, et al. Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM): a qualitative study of a brief individual psychotherapy for individuals with advanced cancer. Palliat Med. 2012;26(5):713–21.PubMedCrossRef Nissim R, Freeman E, Lo C, Zimmermann C, Gagliese L, Rydall A, et al. Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM): a qualitative study of a brief individual psychotherapy for individuals with advanced cancer. Palliat Med. 2012;26(5):713–21.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Richardson A, Plant H, Moore S, Medina J, Cornwall A, Ream E. Developing supportive care for family members of people with lung cancer: a feasibility study. Supportive Care Cancer. 2007;15(11):1259–69.CrossRef Richardson A, Plant H, Moore S, Medina J, Cornwall A, Ream E. Developing supportive care for family members of people with lung cancer: a feasibility study. Supportive Care Cancer. 2007;15(11):1259–69.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Ryan PJ, Howell V, Jones J, Hardy EJ. Lung cancer, caring for the caregivers: a qualitative study of providing pro-active social support targeted to the carers of patients with lung cancer. Palliat Med. 2008;22(3):233–8.PubMedCrossRef Ryan PJ, Howell V, Jones J, Hardy EJ. Lung cancer, caring for the caregivers: a qualitative study of providing pro-active social support targeted to the carers of patients with lung cancer. Palliat Med. 2008;22(3):233–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Involvement of Patients with Lung and Gynecological Cancer and Their Relatives in Psychosocial Cancer Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review
Authors
Bente Hoeck
Loni Ledderer
Helle Ploug Hansen
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Electronic ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-014-0076-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 2/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine