Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2022

08-10-2021 | Response to Letter to the Editor

Invited Response on: “Statistical P values have No Guiding Significance in Clinical Trials of Plastic Surgery with Small Sample Sizes”

Authors: Osama A. Samargandi, Connor McGuire

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Special Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Excerpt

Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Samargandi OA, Koziarz A, Makhdoum A et al (2021) Can we trust the conclusion “no significant difference” in plastic surgery trials? Aesth Plast Surg 45:1920–1922CrossRef Samargandi OA, Koziarz A, Makhdoum A et al (2021) Can we trust the conclusion “no significant difference” in plastic surgery trials? Aesth Plast Surg 45:1920–1922CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Thoma A, Sprague S, Temple C, Archibald S (2008) The role of the randomized controlled trial in plastic surgery. Clin Plast Surg 35(2):275–284CrossRef Thoma A, Sprague S, Temple C, Archibald S (2008) The role of the randomized controlled trial in plastic surgery. Clin Plast Surg 35(2):275–284CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Invited Response on: “Statistical P values have No Guiding Significance in Clinical Trials of Plastic Surgery with Small Sample Sizes”
Authors
Osama A. Samargandi
Connor McGuire
Publication date
08-10-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue Special Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02617-5

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2022

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue