Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Investing in midwifery for sustainable development goals in low- and middle-income countries: a cost-benefit analysis

Authors: Chakib Boukhalfa, Brahim Ouakhzan, Hanane Masbah, Leila Acharai, Saad Zbiri

Published in: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Maternal and neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries is frequently caused by inadequate management of obstetric and neonatal complications and a shortage of skilled health workers. The availability of these workers is essential for effective and high-quality healthcare. To meet the needs of sexual, reproductive, maternal, new-born, child, and adolescent health by 2030, more than one million health workers, including 900 000 midwives, are required globally. Despite this, uncertainty persists regarding the return on investment in the health workforce.

Methods

The objective of this research was to determine the cost-benefit ratio of increasing investment in midwifery in Morocco from 2021 to 2030. A comparative analysis was conducted between scenarios “with” and “without” the additional investment. The costs and benefits were estimated using relevant data from national and international sources.

Results

Following the International Confederation of Midwives’ recommendations, it is advised that Morocco recruit 760 midwives annually to achieve 95% of universal health coverage. This increase in midwifery could result in saving 120 593 lives by 2030, including reducing maternal deaths by 3 201, stillbirths by 48 399, and neonatal deaths by 68 993. The estimated economic benefit of investing in midwives was US$ 10 152 287 749, while the total cost was US$ 638 288 820. Consequently, the cost-benefit ratio was calculated as 15.91, indicating that investing in midwifery would provide 16 times more benefits than costs.

Conclusion

Increasing investment in midwifery appears to be an efficient strategy for achieving comprehensive maternal and child health coverage in low- and middle-income countries.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Dussault G. Framework for health workforce analysis. Ruptures Transdisciplinary Health Journal. 2001;7(2):64–78. Dussault G. Framework for health workforce analysis. Ruptures Transdisciplinary Health Journal. 2001;7(2):64–78.
4.
go back to reference Dubois CA, Singh D. From staff-mix to skill-mix and beyond: towards a systemic approach to health workforce management. Hum Resour Health. 2009;7(1):87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dubois CA, Singh D. From staff-mix to skill-mix and beyond: towards a systemic approach to health workforce management. Hum Resour Health. 2009;7(1):87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Turner HC, Archer RA, Downey LE, Isaranuwatchai W, Chalkidou K, Jit M, Teerawattananon Y. An introduction to the Main types of economic evaluations used for Informing Priority setting and Resource Allocation in Healthcare: key features, uses, and limitations. Front Public Health. 2021;9:722927.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Turner HC, Archer RA, Downey LE, Isaranuwatchai W, Chalkidou K, Jit M, Teerawattananon Y. An introduction to the Main types of economic evaluations used for Informing Priority setting and Resource Allocation in Healthcare: key features, uses, and limitations. Front Public Health. 2021;9:722927.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference World Bank Group. Morocco Economic Report. Spring 2021. World Bank Group. Morocco Economic Report. Spring 2021.
14.
go back to reference Edejer TTT, Baltussen R, Adam T, Hutubessy R, Acharya A, Evans DB, Murray CJL. WHO Guide to Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland. 2003;ISBN 92-4-154601-8.13. Edejer TTT, Baltussen R, Adam T, Hutubessy R, Acharya A, Evans DB, Murray CJL. WHO Guide to Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland. 2003;ISBN 92-4-154601-8.13.
16.
go back to reference Maitra C, Hodge A, Jimenez Soto E. A scoping review of cost benefit analysis in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health: what we know and what are the gaps? Health Policy Plan. 2016;31:1530–47.CrossRefPubMed Maitra C, Hodge A, Jimenez Soto E. A scoping review of cost benefit analysis in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health: what we know and what are the gaps? Health Policy Plan. 2016;31:1530–47.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Jung DW, Nam EW, Kim DH. Cost effective analysis on KOICA and Yonsei University Cooperative Project of MCH Programs in Ethiopia. Korea Assoc. Int Dev Coop. 2013;6:119–52. Jung DW, Nam EW, Kim DH. Cost effective analysis on KOICA and Yonsei University Cooperative Project of MCH Programs in Ethiopia. Korea Assoc. Int Dev Coop. 2013;6:119–52.
18.
19.
go back to reference Nieuwenhuijze M, Leahy-Warren P. Women’s empowerment in pregnancy and Childbirth: a concept analysis. Midwifery. 2019;78:1–7.CrossRefPubMed Nieuwenhuijze M, Leahy-Warren P. Women’s empowerment in pregnancy and Childbirth: a concept analysis. Midwifery. 2019;78:1–7.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Zbiri S, Rozenberg P, Milcent C. Access-to-care: evidence from home-based postnatal coordinated care after hospital discharge. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):1137.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zbiri S, Rozenberg P, Milcent C. Access-to-care: evidence from home-based postnatal coordinated care after hospital discharge. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):1137.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Waterall J, Newland R, Counsell A. Health inequalities: how nurses and midwives can make a difference. Br J Nurs. 2022;31(19):1004–5.CrossRefPubMed Waterall J, Newland R, Counsell A. Health inequalities: how nurses and midwives can make a difference. Br J Nurs. 2022;31(19):1004–5.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, Campbell J, Channon AA, Cheung NF, Silva DR, Downe S, Kennedy HP, Malata A, McCormick F, Wick L, Declercq E. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1129–45. CrossRefPubMed Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, Campbell J, Channon AA, Cheung NF, Silva DR, Downe S, Kennedy HP, Malata A, McCormick F, Wick L, Declercq E. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1129–45. CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference The state of the Morocco Midwifery. Diagnosis of the situation and proposal of a strategic plan for promotion and strengthening (2014–2018). 2013. The state of the Morocco Midwifery. Diagnosis of the situation and proposal of a strategic plan for promotion and strengthening (2014–2018). 2013.
Metadata
Title
Investing in midwifery for sustainable development goals in low- and middle-income countries: a cost-benefit analysis
Authors
Chakib Boukhalfa
Brahim Ouakhzan
Hanane Masbah
Leila Acharai
Saad Zbiri
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1478-7547
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-023-00507-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 1/2024 Go to the issue