Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 5/2015

01-10-2015 | Original Article

Investigation of the clinicopathological features of squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: a retrospective survey of the Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit

Authors: Masayuki Futagami, Yoshihito Yokoyama, Kaori Iino, Masahiko Aoki, Tadahiro Shoji, Toru Sugiyama, Hisanori Ariga, Hideki Tokunaga, Tadao Takano, Yoh Watanabe, Nobuo Yaegashi, Keiichi Jingu, Naoki Sato, Yukihiro Terada, Akira Anbai, Tsuyoshi Ohta, Hirohisa Kurachi, Yuuki Kuroda, Hiroshi Nishiyama, Keiya Fujimori, Takafumi Watanabe, Hisashi Sato, Toru Tase, Hitoshi Wada, Hideki Mizunuma

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This multi-institutional study was conducted to clarify the clinicopathological features of squamous cell carcinomas of the vulva.

Methods

The medical records of vulvar cancer patients treated between 2002 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed following approval by the Institutional Review Board of each institution.

Results

One hundred and eleven patients with vulvar malignancies were included. Of these, 63 patients had squamous cell carcinoma (57 %). Initial treatment was surgery, radiation therapy (RT), and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in 34 (54 %), 15 (24 %), and 11 (17 %) patients, respectively. Nineteen, 11, 26, and 7 patients had stage I, II, III, and IV disease, respectively. Of the 34 patients who had surgical treatment, 50 % had stage I disease, while 74 % of those who received CCRT had stage III or IV disease. Complete response (CR) rates for the surgery, RT, and CCRT groups were 73, 60, and 64 %, respectively. The 5-year survival rates for stage I/II and III/IV disease were 64 and 39 %, respectively (P = 0.019). The 5-year survival rates for the surgery, RT, and CCRT groups were 53, 38, and 50 %, respectively, and the prognosis of patients treated with surgery or CCRT was significantly better than that of patients who received RT (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, clinical response to initial treatment was an independent prognostic factor (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Although many patients had advanced-stage disease in the CCRT group, the therapeutic outcome for the surgery and CCRT groups was similar. Thus, CCRT may be a promising treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hacker NF (2009) Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105(2):105–106CrossRefPubMed Hacker NF (2009) Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105(2):105–106CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Hopkins MP, Reid GC, Morley GW (1993) Radical vulvectomy: the decision for the incision. Cancer 72(3):799–803CrossRefPubMed Hopkins MP, Reid GC, Morley GW (1993) Radical vulvectomy: the decision for the incision. Cancer 72(3):799–803CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Beriwal S, Shukla G, Shinde A et al (2013) Preoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced vulvar carcinoma: analysis of pattern of relapse. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85(5):1269–1274CrossRefPubMed Beriwal S, Shukla G, Shinde A et al (2013) Preoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced vulvar carcinoma: analysis of pattern of relapse. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85(5):1269–1274CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Wills A, Obermair A (2009) A review of complications associated with the surgical treatment of vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 131(2):467–479CrossRef Wills A, Obermair A (2009) A review of complications associated with the surgical treatment of vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 131(2):467–479CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J et al (1999) Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 340(15):1137–1143CrossRefPubMed Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J et al (1999) Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 340(15):1137–1143CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB et al (1999) Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 340(15):1144–1153CrossRefPubMed Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB et al (1999) Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 340(15):1144–1153CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Whitney CW, Sause W, Bundy BN et al (1999) Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 17(5):1339–1348PubMed Whitney CW, Sause W, Bundy BN et al (1999) Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 17(5):1339–1348PubMed
9.
go back to reference Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A et al (1997) Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 350(9077):535–540CrossRefPubMed Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A et al (1997) Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 350(9077):535–540CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Moore DH (2009) Chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: are two therapies better than one? Gynecol Oncol 113(3):379–383CrossRefPubMed Moore DH (2009) Chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: are two therapies better than one? Gynecol Oncol 113(3):379–383CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–247CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–247CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Beller U, Quinn MA, Benedet JL et al (2006) Carcinoma of the vulva: FIGO 26th Annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95(Supple 1):S7–S27CrossRefPubMed Beller U, Quinn MA, Benedet JL et al (2006) Carcinoma of the vulva: FIGO 26th Annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95(Supple 1):S7–S27CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sznurkowski JJ, Milczek T, Emerich J (2013) Prognostic factors and value of 2009 FIGO staging system in vulvar cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287(6):1211–1218PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Sznurkowski JJ, Milczek T, Emerich J (2013) Prognostic factors and value of 2009 FIGO staging system in vulvar cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287(6):1211–1218PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Aragona AM, Cuneo NA, Soderini AH et al (2014) An analysis of reported independent prognostic factors for survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: is tumor size significance being underrated? Gynecol Oncol 132(3):643–648CrossRefPubMed Aragona AM, Cuneo NA, Soderini AH et al (2014) An analysis of reported independent prognostic factors for survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: is tumor size significance being underrated? Gynecol Oncol 132(3):643–648CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Iacoponi S, Zapardiel I, Diestro MD et al (2013) Prognostic factors associated with local recurrence in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. J Gynecol Oncol 24(3):242–248PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Iacoponi S, Zapardiel I, Diestro MD et al (2013) Prognostic factors associated with local recurrence in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. J Gynecol Oncol 24(3):242–248PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tans L, Ansink AC, Rooij PH et al (2011) The role of chemo-radiotherapy in the management of locally advanced carcinoma of the vulva. Am J Clin Oncol 34(1):22–26CrossRefPubMed Tans L, Ansink AC, Rooij PH et al (2011) The role of chemo-radiotherapy in the management of locally advanced carcinoma of the vulva. Am J Clin Oncol 34(1):22–26CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Mak RH, Halasz LM, Tanaka CK et al (2011) Outcomes after radiation therapy with concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy or every-3-4-week 5-fluorouracil-containing regimens for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 120(1):101–107CrossRefPubMed Mak RH, Halasz LM, Tanaka CK et al (2011) Outcomes after radiation therapy with concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy or every-3-4-week 5-fluorouracil-containing regimens for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 120(1):101–107CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Moore DH, Ali S, Koh WJ et al (2012) A phase II trial of radiation therapy and weekly cisplatin chemotherapy for the treatment of locally-advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: A gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol 124(3):529–533CrossRefPubMed Moore DH, Ali S, Koh WJ et al (2012) A phase II trial of radiation therapy and weekly cisplatin chemotherapy for the treatment of locally-advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: A gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol 124(3):529–533CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Yokoyama Y, Takano T, Nakahara K et al (2008) A phase II multicenter trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly nedaplatin in advanced uterine cervical carcinoma: Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit Study. Oncol Rep 19(6):1551–1556PubMed Yokoyama Y, Takano T, Nakahara K et al (2008) A phase II multicenter trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly nedaplatin in advanced uterine cervical carcinoma: Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit Study. Oncol Rep 19(6):1551–1556PubMed
20.
go back to reference Reade CJ, Eiriksson LR, Mackay H (2014) Systemic therapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: current status and future directions. Gynecol Oncol 132(3):780–789CrossRefPubMed Reade CJ, Eiriksson LR, Mackay H (2014) Systemic therapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: current status and future directions. Gynecol Oncol 132(3):780–789CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Shylasree TS, Bryant A, Howells RE (2011) Chemoradiation for advanced primary vulval cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 13(4):CD003752. doi:10.1002/14651858 Shylasree TS, Bryant A, Howells RE (2011) Chemoradiation for advanced primary vulval cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 13(4):CD003752. doi:10.​1002/​14651858
22.
go back to reference Baiocchi G, Silva Cestari FM, Rocha RM et al (2013) Prognostic value of the number and laterality of metastatic inguinal lymph nodes in vulvar cancer: revisiting the FIGO staging system. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(7):780–785CrossRefPubMed Baiocchi G, Silva Cestari FM, Rocha RM et al (2013) Prognostic value of the number and laterality of metastatic inguinal lymph nodes in vulvar cancer: revisiting the FIGO staging system. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(7):780–785CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Tabbaa ZM, Gonzalez J, Sznurkowski JJ et al (2012) Impact of the new FIGO 2009 staging classification for vulvar cancer on prognosis and stage distribution. Gynecol Oncol 127(1):147–152CrossRefPubMed Tabbaa ZM, Gonzalez J, Sznurkowski JJ et al (2012) Impact of the new FIGO 2009 staging classification for vulvar cancer on prognosis and stage distribution. Gynecol Oncol 127(1):147–152CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Woelber L, Mahner S, Voelker K et al (2009) Clinicopathological prognostic factors and patterns of recurrence in vulvar cancer. Anticancer Res 29(2):545–552PubMed Woelber L, Mahner S, Voelker K et al (2009) Clinicopathological prognostic factors and patterns of recurrence in vulvar cancer. Anticancer Res 29(2):545–552PubMed
Metadata
Title
Investigation of the clinicopathological features of squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: a retrospective survey of the Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit
Authors
Masayuki Futagami
Yoshihito Yokoyama
Kaori Iino
Masahiko Aoki
Tadahiro Shoji
Toru Sugiyama
Hisanori Ariga
Hideki Tokunaga
Tadao Takano
Yoh Watanabe
Nobuo Yaegashi
Keiichi Jingu
Naoki Sato
Yukihiro Terada
Akira Anbai
Tsuyoshi Ohta
Hirohisa Kurachi
Yuuki Kuroda
Hiroshi Nishiyama
Keiya Fujimori
Takafumi Watanabe
Hisashi Sato
Toru Tase
Hitoshi Wada
Hideki Mizunuma
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-015-0803-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 5/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine