Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology 2/2017

01-06-2017

Investigation of noise sources for digital radiography systems

Authors: Lutfi Ergun, Turan Olgar

Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The performance of digital radiography systems can be evaluated in terms of spatial resolution and noise. Noise plays an important role in the achievable image quality for detecting small and low-contrast structures in digital images created by these systems. Our aim in this study was to investigate the noise sources both in the spatial and frequency domain for three digital radiography systems, one digital fluoroscopy system, and one digital mammography system, and to obtain information about the effective operating dose range of these detectors. Noise evaluation in the spatial domain was done with the relative standard deviation–detector air kerma relationship evaluation method. The characterization of the noise in the spatial domain gives information about the types of noise, but does not give information about the noise power distribution in frequency space. Therefore, noise evaluation in the frequency domain was carried out by noise power spectrum measurement. The observed dominant noise component at lower detector doses was electronic noise for the digital mammography system, whereas structured noise was observed to make up nearly half of the total noise at higher detector doses for one of the digital radiography systems. The structured noise component was increased by use of a grid in these systems, independent of the grid ratio and grid frequency, but this increase was lower for higher grid frequencies. Furthermore, the structured noise coefficient was decreased with gain and offset calibrations. The five systems which we evaluated behaved as a quantum noise limited for clinically used detector doses.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bacher K. Evaluation of image quality and patient radiation dose in digital radiology. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Department of Human Anatomy, Embryology, Histology and Medical Physics. University of Ghent, Gent, Belgium; 2006. Bacher K. Evaluation of image quality and patient radiation dose in digital radiology. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Department of Human Anatomy, Embryology, Histology and Medical Physics. University of Ghent, Gent, Belgium; 2006.
2.
go back to reference Williams MB, Mangiafico PA, Simoni PU. Noise power spectra of images from digital mammography detectors. Med Phys. 1999;26(7):1279–93.CrossRefPubMed Williams MB, Mangiafico PA, Simoni PU. Noise power spectra of images from digital mammography detectors. Med Phys. 1999;26(7):1279–93.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Samei E. Performance of digital radiographic detectors: quantification and assessment methods. In: Samei E, Flynn MJ, editors. Syllabus: advances in digital radiography-categorical course in diagnostic radiology physics. Oak Brook: Radiological Society of North America; 2003. p. 37–47. Samei E. Performance of digital radiographic detectors: quantification and assessment methods. In: Samei E, Flynn MJ, editors. Syllabus: advances in digital radiography-categorical course in diagnostic radiology physics. Oak Brook: Radiological Society of North America; 2003. p. 37–47.
4.
go back to reference Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM. The essential physics of medical imaging. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. ISBN 0-683-30118-7. Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM. The essential physics of medical imaging. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. ISBN 0-683-30118-7.
5.
go back to reference Neitzel U, Günther-Kohfahl S, Borasi G, Samei E. Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of a digital X-ray detector: comparison of three evaluations using a common image data set. Med Phys. 2004;31(8):2205–11.CrossRefPubMed Neitzel U, Günther-Kohfahl S, Borasi G, Samei E. Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of a digital X-ray detector: comparison of three evaluations using a common image data set. Med Phys. 2004;31(8):2205–11.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dobbins JT III, Samei E, Ranger NT, Chen Y. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum. Med Phys. 2006;33(5):1466–75.CrossRefPubMed Dobbins JT III, Samei E, Ranger NT, Chen Y. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum. Med Phys. 2006;33(5):1466–75.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Marshall NW, Monnin P, Bosmans H, Bochud FO, Verdun FR. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56(14):4201–20.CrossRefPubMed Marshall NW, Monnin P, Bosmans H, Bochud FO, Verdun FR. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56(14):4201–20.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Borasi G, Nitrosi A, Ferrari P, Tassoni D. On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography. Med Phys. 2003;30(7):1719–31.CrossRefPubMed Borasi G, Nitrosi A, Ferrari P, Tassoni D. On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography. Med Phys. 2003;30(7):1719–31.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rivetti S, Lanconelli N, Campanini R, Bertolini M, Borasi G, Nitrosi A, Danielli C, Angelini L, Maggi S. Comparison of different commercial FFDM units by means of physical characterization and contrast-detail analysis. Med Phys. 2006;33(11):4198–209.CrossRefPubMed Rivetti S, Lanconelli N, Campanini R, Bertolini M, Borasi G, Nitrosi A, Danielli C, Angelini L, Maggi S. Comparison of different commercial FFDM units by means of physical characterization and contrast-detail analysis. Med Phys. 2006;33(11):4198–209.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rivetti S, Lanconelli N, Bertolini M, Acchiappati D. A new clinical unit for digital radiography based on a thick amorphous selenium plate: physical and psychophysical characterization. Med Phys. 2011;38(8):4480–8.CrossRefPubMed Rivetti S, Lanconelli N, Bertolini M, Acchiappati D. A new clinical unit for digital radiography based on a thick amorphous selenium plate: physical and psychophysical characterization. Med Phys. 2011;38(8):4480–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference IEC 62220-1. Medical electrical equipment—Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices—part 1: determination of the detective quantum efficiency. Geneva, Switzerland: IEC International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC); 2003. IEC 62220-1. Medical electrical equipment—Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices—part 1: determination of the detective quantum efficiency. Geneva, Switzerland: IEC International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC); 2003.
13.
go back to reference IEC 62220-1-2. Medical electrical equipment characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices-part 1–2. Determination of detective quantum efficiency—detectors used in mammography. Geneva, Switzerland: IEC International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC); 2007. IEC 62220-1-2. Medical electrical equipment characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices-part 1–2. Determination of detective quantum efficiency—detectors used in mammography. Geneva, Switzerland: IEC International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC); 2007.
14.
go back to reference Bouwman R, Young K, Lazzari B, Ravaglia V, Broeders M, van Engen R. An alternative method for noise analysis using pixel variance as part of quality control procedures on digital mammography systems. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54(22):6809–22.CrossRefPubMed Bouwman R, Young K, Lazzari B, Ravaglia V, Broeders M, van Engen R. An alternative method for noise analysis using pixel variance as part of quality control procedures on digital mammography systems. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54(22):6809–22.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Marshall NW. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography X-ray systems. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52(18):5545–68.CrossRefPubMed Marshall NW. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography X-ray systems. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52(18):5545–68.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference NHSBSP (National Health Service Breast Screening Programme). Calculation of quantitative image quality parameters NHSBSP Equipment Report 0902. Sheffield: NHSBSP Publications; 2009. NHSBSP (National Health Service Breast Screening Programme). Calculation of quantitative image quality parameters NHSBSP Equipment Report 0902. Sheffield: NHSBSP Publications; 2009.
17.
go back to reference Saunders RS, Samei E, Jesneck JL, Lo JY. Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector. Med Phys. 2005;32(2):588–99.CrossRefPubMed Saunders RS, Samei E, Jesneck JL, Lo JY. Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector. Med Phys. 2005;32(2):588–99.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ravaglia V, Bouwman R, Young K, Van Engen R, Lazzari B, Noise analysis of full field digital mammography systems. In: Proceedings of SPIE 2009; 7258: 72581B1-11. Ravaglia V, Bouwman R, Young K, Van Engen R, Lazzari B, Noise analysis of full field digital mammography systems. In: Proceedings of SPIE 2009; 7258: 72581B1-11.
19.
go back to reference Doyle P. Assessment and optimisation of digital radiography systems for clinical use. Department of Clinical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Dec 2008. Doyle P. Assessment and optimisation of digital radiography systems for clinical use. Department of Clinical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Dec 2008.
20.
go back to reference Samei E, Ranger NT, MacKenzie A, Honey ID, Dobbins JT III, Ravin CE. Effective DQE (eDQE) and speed of digital radiographic systems: an experimental methodology. Med Phys. 2009;36(8):3806–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Samei E, Ranger NT, MacKenzie A, Honey ID, Dobbins JT III, Ravin CE. Effective DQE (eDQE) and speed of digital radiographic systems: an experimental methodology. Med Phys. 2009;36(8):3806–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Zhao W, Blevis I, Germann S, Rowlands JA, Waechter D, Huang Z. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: construction and evaluation of a prototype real-time detector. Med Phys. 1997;24:1834–43.CrossRefPubMed Zhao W, Blevis I, Germann S, Rowlands JA, Waechter D, Huang Z. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: construction and evaluation of a prototype real-time detector. Med Phys. 1997;24:1834–43.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Rowlands JA, Yorkston J. Flat panel detectors for digital radiology. In: Beutel J, Kundel HL, Van Metter RL, editors. Physics and psychophysics, vol. 1. Bellingham: SPIE Optical Engineering Press; 2000. p. 223–328. Rowlands JA, Yorkston J. Flat panel detectors for digital radiology. In: Beutel J, Kundel HL, Van Metter RL, editors. Physics and psychophysics, vol. 1. Bellingham: SPIE Optical Engineering Press; 2000. p. 223–328.
Metadata
Title
Investigation of noise sources for digital radiography systems
Authors
Lutfi Ergun
Turan Olgar
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Radiological Physics and Technology / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1865-0333
Electronic ISSN: 1865-0341
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-016-0381-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Radiological Physics and Technology 2/2017 Go to the issue