Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research

Investigating inlay designs of class II cavity with deep margin elevation using finite element method

Authors: Yung-Chung Chen, Chi-Lun Lin, Chun-Hsien Hou

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study evaluates the mechanical performance of deep margin elevation technique for carious cavities by considering the shape designs and material selections of inlay using a computational approach combined with the design of experiments method. The goal is to understand the effects of the design parameters on the deep margin elevation technique and provide design guidelines from the biomechanics perspective.

Methods

Seven geometric design parameters for defining an inlay’s shape of a premolar were specified, and the influence of cavity shape and material selection on the overall stress distribution was investigated via automated modelling. Material selection included composite resin, ceramic, and lithium disilicate. Finite element analysis was performed to evaluate the mechanical behavior of the tooth and inlay under a compressive load. Next, the analysis of variance was conducted to identify the parameters with a significant effect on the stress occurred in the materials. Finally, the response surface method was used to analyze the stress responses of the restored tooth with different design parameters.

Results

The restored tooth with a larger isthmus width demonstrated superior mechanical performance in all three types of inlay materials, while the influence of other design parameters varied with the inlay material selection. The height of the deep margin elevation layer insignificantly affected the mechanical performance of the restored tooth.

Conclusions

A proper geometric design of inlay enhances the mechanical performance of the restored tooth and could require less volume of the natural dentin to be excavated. Furthermore, under the loading conditions evaluated in this study, the deep margin elevation layer did not extensively affect the strength of the tooth structure.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Magne P, Spreafico RC. Deep margin elevation: a paradigm shift. Am J Esthet Dent. 2012;2(2):86–96. Magne P, Spreafico RC. Deep margin elevation: a paradigm shift. Am J Esthet Dent. 2012;2(2):86–96.
2.
go back to reference Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthetic Dent. 1998;10(1):47–54. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthetic Dent. 1998;10(1):47–54.
3.
go back to reference Suzuki M, Jordan RE. Glass ionomer-composite sandwich technique. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990;120(1):55–7.PubMedCrossRef Suzuki M, Jordan RE. Glass ionomer-composite sandwich technique. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990;120(1):55–7.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference McLean JW, Wilson A. The clinical development of the glass-ionomer cement. II. Some clinical applications. Aust Dent J. 1977;22(2):120–7.PubMedCrossRef McLean JW, Wilson A. The clinical development of the glass-ionomer cement. II. Some clinical applications. Aust Dent J. 1977;22(2):120–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Carvalho AO, Bruzi G, Giannini M, Magne P. Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM complete crowns with a simplified cementation process. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(4):310–7.PubMedCrossRef Carvalho AO, Bruzi G, Giannini M, Magne P. Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM complete crowns with a simplified cementation process. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(4):310–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Frankenberger R, Hehn J, Hajtó J, Krämer N, Naumann M, Koch A, et al. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(1):177–83.PubMedCrossRef Frankenberger R, Hehn J, Hajtó J, Krämer N, Naumann M, Koch A, et al. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(1):177–83.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Zaruba M, Göhring TN, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T. Influence of a proximal margin elevation technique on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71(2):317–24.PubMedCrossRef Zaruba M, Göhring TN, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T. Influence of a proximal margin elevation technique on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71(2):317–24.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ilgenstein I, Zitzmann NU, Bühler J, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T, Weiger R, et al. Influence of proximal box elevation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(5):1021–8.PubMedCrossRef Ilgenstein I, Zitzmann NU, Bühler J, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T, Weiger R, et al. Influence of proximal box elevation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(5):1021–8.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Frankenberger R, Zeilinger I, Krech M, Mörig G, Naumann M, Braun A, Krämer N, Roggendorf MJ. Stability of endodontically treated teeth with differently invasive restorations: adhesive vs. non-adhesive cusp stabilization. Dent Mater. 2015;31(11):1312–20.PubMedCrossRef Frankenberger R, Zeilinger I, Krech M, Mörig G, Naumann M, Braun A, Krämer N, Roggendorf MJ. Stability of endodontically treated teeth with differently invasive restorations: adhesive vs. non-adhesive cusp stabilization. Dent Mater. 2015;31(11):1312–20.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Seow LL, Toh CG, Wilson NH. Strain measurements and fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with all-ceramic restorations. J Dent. 2015;43(1):126–32.PubMedCrossRef Seow LL, Toh CG, Wilson NH. Strain measurements and fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with all-ceramic restorations. J Dent. 2015;43(1):126–32.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Soares CJ, Martins LR, Fonseca RB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Fernandes Neto AJ. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95(6):421–9.PubMedCrossRef Soares CJ, Martins LR, Fonseca RB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Fernandes Neto AJ. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95(6):421–9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima S. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(1):94–8.PubMed Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima S. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(1):94–8.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Mei ML, Chen YM, Li H, Chu CH. Influence of the indirect restoration design on the fracture resistance: a finite element study. Biomed Eng. 2016;15(1):3. Mei ML, Chen YM, Li H, Chu CH. Influence of the indirect restoration design on the fracture resistance: a finite element study. Biomed Eng. 2016;15(1):3.
15.
go back to reference Yamanel K, Çaglar A, Gülsahi K, Özden UA. Effects of different ceramic and composite materials on stress distribution in inlay and onlay cavities: 3-D finite element analysis. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(6):661–70.PubMedCrossRef Yamanel K, Çaglar A, Gülsahi K, Özden UA. Effects of different ceramic and composite materials on stress distribution in inlay and onlay cavities: 3-D finite element analysis. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(6):661–70.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Anami LC, Lima JMC, Corazza PH, Yamamoto ETC, Bottino MA, Borges ALS. Finite element analysis of the influence of geometry and design of zirconia crowns on stress distribution. J Prosthodont. 2015;24(2):146–51.PubMedCrossRef Anami LC, Lima JMC, Corazza PH, Yamamoto ETC, Bottino MA, Borges ALS. Finite element analysis of the influence of geometry and design of zirconia crowns on stress distribution. J Prosthodont. 2015;24(2):146–51.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ausiello P, Franciosa P, Martorelli M, Watts DC. Numerical fatigue 3D-FE modeling of indirect composite-restored posterior teeth. Dent Mater. 2011;27(5):423–30.PubMedCrossRef Ausiello P, Franciosa P, Martorelli M, Watts DC. Numerical fatigue 3D-FE modeling of indirect composite-restored posterior teeth. Dent Mater. 2011;27(5):423–30.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ausiello P, Ciaramella S, Martorelli M, Lanzotti A, Gloria A, Watts DC. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater. 2017;33(12):1456–65.PubMedCrossRef Ausiello P, Ciaramella S, Martorelli M, Lanzotti A, Gloria A, Watts DC. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater. 2017;33(12):1456–65.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Dejak B, Mlotkowski A. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication. Dent Mater. 2015;31(3):77–87.CrossRef Dejak B, Mlotkowski A. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication. Dent Mater. 2015;31(3):77–87.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ausiello P, Ciaramella S, Garcia-Godoy F, Martorelli M, Sorrentino R, Gloria A. Stress distribution of bulk-fill resin composite in class II restorations. Am J Dent. 2017;30(4):227–32.PubMed Ausiello P, Ciaramella S, Garcia-Godoy F, Martorelli M, Sorrentino R, Gloria A. Stress distribution of bulk-fill resin composite in class II restorations. Am J Dent. 2017;30(4):227–32.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Zelic K, Vukicevic A, Jovicic G, Aleksandrovic S, Filipovic N, Djuric M. Mechanical weakening of devitalized teeth: three-dimensional finite element analysis and prediction of tooth fracture. Int Endod J. 2015;48(9):850–63.PubMedCrossRef Zelic K, Vukicevic A, Jovicic G, Aleksandrovic S, Filipovic N, Djuric M. Mechanical weakening of devitalized teeth: three-dimensional finite element analysis and prediction of tooth fracture. Int Endod J. 2015;48(9):850–63.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Yap AUJ, Tan CH, Chung SM. Wear behavior of new composite restoratives. Oper Dent. 2004;29:269–74.PubMed Yap AUJ, Tan CH, Chung SM. Wear behavior of new composite restoratives. Oper Dent. 2004;29:269–74.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Florescu A, Pangica AM, Hancu V, Manu R, Biclesanu CF. FEM study regarding materials retention used for abfraction adhesive restoration. Mater Plast. 2016;53(4):689–92. Florescu A, Pangica AM, Hancu V, Manu R, Biclesanu CF. FEM study regarding materials retention used for abfraction adhesive restoration. Mater Plast. 2016;53(4):689–92.
24.
go back to reference Köycü BÇ, İmirzalioğlu P, Oezden UA. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in inlay-restored mandibular first molar under simultaneous thermomechanical loads. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(2):180–6.CrossRef Köycü BÇ, İmirzalioğlu P, Oezden UA. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in inlay-restored mandibular first molar under simultaneous thermomechanical loads. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(2):180–6.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Zhu J, Rong Q, Wang X, Gao X. Influence of remaining tooth structure and restorative material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(5):646–55.PubMedCrossRef Zhu J, Rong Q, Wang X, Gao X. Influence of remaining tooth structure and restorative material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(5):646–55.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Anatavara S, Sitthiseripratip K, Senawongse P. Stress relieving behaviour of flowable composite liners: a finite element analysis. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(3):369–78.PubMedCrossRef Anatavara S, Sitthiseripratip K, Senawongse P. Stress relieving behaviour of flowable composite liners: a finite element analysis. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(3):369–78.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference van den Braber W, van der Glas H, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Masticatory function in retrognathic patients, before and after mandibular advancement surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;62(5):549–54.CrossRef van den Braber W, van der Glas H, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Masticatory function in retrognathic patients, before and after mandibular advancement surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;62(5):549–54.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Cicciù M, Cervino G, Milone D, Risitano G. FEM investigation of the stress distribution over mandibular bone due to screwed overdenture positioned on dental implants. Materials. 2018;11(9):1512.PubMedCentralCrossRef Cicciù M, Cervino G, Milone D, Risitano G. FEM investigation of the stress distribution over mandibular bone due to screwed overdenture positioned on dental implants. Materials. 2018;11(9):1512.PubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Rosatto CMP, Bicalho AA, Veríssimo C, Bragança GF, Rodrigues MP, Tantbirojn D. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique. J Dent. 2015;43(12):1519–28.PubMedCrossRef Rosatto CMP, Bicalho AA, Veríssimo C, Bragança GF, Rodrigues MP, Tantbirojn D. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique. J Dent. 2015;43(12):1519–28.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Giannini M, Soares CJ, de Carvalho RM. Ultimate tensile strength of tooth structures. Dent Mater. 2004;20(4):322–9.PubMedCrossRef Giannini M, Soares CJ, de Carvalho RM. Ultimate tensile strength of tooth structures. Dent Mater. 2004;20(4):322–9.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Xu J, Liang B, Hoth-Hannig W, Zhang L, Jin X, Wang C, et al. Do phosphoric acid esters affect the immediate enamel bond strengths? J Adhes Sci Technol. 2016;30(22):2498–510.CrossRef Xu J, Liang B, Hoth-Hannig W, Zhang L, Jin X, Wang C, et al. Do phosphoric acid esters affect the immediate enamel bond strengths? J Adhes Sci Technol. 2016;30(22):2498–510.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Al Ghanem A, Fernandes G, Visser M, Dziak R, Renné WG, Sabatini C. Biocompatibility and bond degradation of poly-acrylic acid coated copper iodide-adhesives. Dent Mater. 2017;33(9):e336–47.CrossRef Al Ghanem A, Fernandes G, Visser M, Dziak R, Renné WG, Sabatini C. Biocompatibility and bond degradation of poly-acrylic acid coated copper iodide-adhesives. Dent Mater. 2017;33(9):e336–47.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Vieira-Filho WS, Alonso RCB, González AHM, D’Alpino PHP, Di Hipólito V. Bond strength and chemical interaction of self-adhesive resin cements according to the dentin region. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2017;73:22–7.CrossRef Vieira-Filho WS, Alonso RCB, González AHM, D’Alpino PHP, Di Hipólito V. Bond strength and chemical interaction of self-adhesive resin cements according to the dentin region. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2017;73:22–7.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Cervino G, Fiorillo L, Arzukanyan AV, Spagnuolo G, Campagna P, Cicciù M. Application of bioengineering devices for stress evaluation in dentistry: the last 10 years FEM parametric analysis of outcomes and current trends. Minerva Stomatol. 2020;69(1):55–62.PubMedCrossRef Cervino G, Fiorillo L, Arzukanyan AV, Spagnuolo G, Campagna P, Cicciù M. Application of bioengineering devices for stress evaluation in dentistry: the last 10 years FEM parametric analysis of outcomes and current trends. Minerva Stomatol. 2020;69(1):55–62.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Cicciù M, Cervino G, Terranova A, Risitano G, Raffaele M, Cucinotta F, Fiorillo L. Prosthetic and mechanical parameters of the facial bone under the load of different dental implant shapes: a parametric study. Prosthesis. 2019;1(1):41–53.CrossRef Cicciù M, Cervino G, Terranova A, Risitano G, Raffaele M, Cucinotta F, Fiorillo L. Prosthetic and mechanical parameters of the facial bone under the load of different dental implant shapes: a parametric study. Prosthesis. 2019;1(1):41–53.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Fiorillo L, Cicciù M, D’Amico C, Mauceri R, Oteri G, Cervino G. Finite element method and von mises investigation on bone response to dynamic stress with a novel conical dental implant connection. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:2976067.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fiorillo L, Cicciù M, D’Amico C, Mauceri R, Oteri G, Cervino G. Finite element method and von mises investigation on bone response to dynamic stress with a novel conical dental implant connection. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:2976067.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Oladapo BI, Zahedi SA, Vahidnia F, Ikumapayi OM, Farooq MU. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of a porcelain crowned tooth. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci. 2018;7(4):461–4. Oladapo BI, Zahedi SA, Vahidnia F, Ikumapayi OM, Farooq MU. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of a porcelain crowned tooth. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci. 2018;7(4):461–4.
38.
go back to reference Oyar P, Ulusoy M, Eskitaşçıoğlu G. Finite element analysis of stress distribution in ceramic crowns fabricated with different tooth preparation designs. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2014;112(4):871–7.CrossRef Oyar P, Ulusoy M, Eskitaşçıoğlu G. Finite element analysis of stress distribution in ceramic crowns fabricated with different tooth preparation designs. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2014;112(4):871–7.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Lin J, Lin Z, Zheng Z. Effect of different restorative crown design and materials on stress distribution in endodontically treated molars: a finite element analysis study. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):1–8.CrossRef Lin J, Lin Z, Zheng Z. Effect of different restorative crown design and materials on stress distribution in endodontically treated molars: a finite element analysis study. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):1–8.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Kim SY, Kim BS, Kim H, Cho SY. Occlusal stress distribution and remaining crack propagation of a cracked tooth treated with different materials and designs: 3D finite element analysis. Dent Mater. 2021;37(4):731–40.PubMedCrossRef Kim SY, Kim BS, Kim H, Cho SY. Occlusal stress distribution and remaining crack propagation of a cracked tooth treated with different materials and designs: 3D finite element analysis. Dent Mater. 2021;37(4):731–40.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Yang H, Park C, Shin JH, Yun KD, Lim HP, Park SW, Chung H. Stress distribution in premolars restored with inlays or onlays: 3D finite element analysis. J Adv Prosthodontics. 2018;10(3):184.CrossRef Yang H, Park C, Shin JH, Yun KD, Lim HP, Park SW, Chung H. Stress distribution in premolars restored with inlays or onlays: 3D finite element analysis. J Adv Prosthodontics. 2018;10(3):184.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Sener-Yamaner ID, Ekici B, Sertgöz A, Yuzbasioglu E, Özcan M. Finite element analysis on the optimal material choice and cavity design parameters for MOD inlays exposed to different force vectors and magnitudes. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2017;31(1):8–20.CrossRef Sener-Yamaner ID, Ekici B, Sertgöz A, Yuzbasioglu E, Özcan M. Finite element analysis on the optimal material choice and cavity design parameters for MOD inlays exposed to different force vectors and magnitudes. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2017;31(1):8–20.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Investigating inlay designs of class II cavity with deep margin elevation using finite element method
Authors
Yung-Chung Chen
Chi-Lun Lin
Chun-Hsien Hou
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01630-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Oral Health 1/2021 Go to the issue