Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 2/2012

01-06-2012 | Reflections

Introducing Students to Cancer Prevention Careers through Programmed Summer Research Experiences

Authors: Carrie Cameron, Candice L. Collie, Shine Chang

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Training programs in cancer prevention research play an important role in addressing impending shortages in the cancer prevention workforce. Published reports on the effectiveness of these programs, however, often focus on a program’s success in recruiting and retaining a demographically diverse trainee population or on academic successes of the trainees, in general. Little has been reported about programs’ success in stimulating long-term interest in cancer prevention per se, whether in research or in other choATsen applications. We set out to examine the success of our National Cancer Institute (NCI) R25E American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)-funded summer research experiences program for undergraduates at fostering awareness of and career interest in cancer prevention. Fourteen summer research undergraduates participated in a 12-week structured training program which featured a variety of experiences designed to create awareness of and interest in cancer prevention and cancer prevention research as career tracks. Experiences included career talks by faculty, informational interviewing of role model faculty, career exploration workshops, and structured interactions with graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and junior faculty. Students were surveyed about the effectiveness of the program via SurveyMonkey 8 months after completing the program. This article reports on the results of the survey and analyzes the relative effectiveness of the various types of programming strategies used. Implications for use in training program development are discussed.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Willet W (2003) Cancer prevention and early detection. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:252s Willet W (2003) Cancer prevention and early detection. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:252s
2.
go back to reference Lippman SM, Hong WK (2002) Cancer prevention science and practice. Cancer Res 62(18):5119–5125PubMed Lippman SM, Hong WK (2002) Cancer prevention science and practice. Cancer Res 62(18):5119–5125PubMed
3.
go back to reference Chang S et al (2004) The characteristics and training of professionals in cancer prevention and control: a survey of the American Society for Preventive Oncology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(7):1094–1098PubMed Chang S et al (2004) The characteristics and training of professionals in cancer prevention and control: a survey of the American Society for Preventive Oncology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(7):1094–1098PubMed
4.
go back to reference Blazer KR et al (2009) “Future directions in cancer prevention and control: workforce implications for training, practice, and policy” symposium, October 17 to 18, 2009, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19(6):1655–1660CrossRef Blazer KR et al (2009) “Future directions in cancer prevention and control: workforce implications for training, practice, and policy” symposium, October 17 to 18, 2009, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19(6):1655–1660CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chang S, Collie CL (2009) The future of cancer prevention: will our workforce be ready? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18(9):2348–2351PubMedCrossRef Chang S, Collie CL (2009) The future of cancer prevention: will our workforce be ready? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18(9):2348–2351PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nash JM (2008) Transdisciplinary training: key components and prerequisites for success. Am J Prev Med 35(2 Supplement 1):S133–S140PubMedCrossRef Nash JM (2008) Transdisciplinary training: key components and prerequisites for success. Am J Prev Med 35(2 Supplement 1):S133–S140PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Coronado G et al (2010) Undergraduate cancer training program for underrepresented students: findings from a minority institution/cancer center partnership. J Cancer Educ 25:32–35PubMedCrossRef Coronado G et al (2010) Undergraduate cancer training program for underrepresented students: findings from a minority institution/cancer center partnership. J Cancer Educ 25:32–35PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Garrison E et al (2010) Development and pilot evaluation of a cancer-focused summer research education program Navajo undergraduate students. J Cancer Educ 25:650–658PubMedCrossRef Garrison E et al (2010) Development and pilot evaluation of a cancer-focused summer research education program Navajo undergraduate students. J Cancer Educ 25:650–658PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dores GM et al (2006) Evaluating research training outcomes: experience from the cancer prevention fellowship program at the national cancer institute. Acad Med 81(6):535–541PubMedCrossRef Dores GM et al (2006) Evaluating research training outcomes: experience from the cancer prevention fellowship program at the national cancer institute. Acad Med 81(6):535–541PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lopatto D (2004) Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): first findings. Cell Biol Educ 3(4):270–277PubMedCrossRef Lopatto D (2004) Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): first findings. Cell Biol Educ 3(4):270–277PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Seymour E et al (2004) Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: first findings from a three-year study. Sci Educ 88(4):493–534CrossRef Seymour E et al (2004) Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: first findings from a three-year study. Sci Educ 88(4):493–534CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fitzsimmons SJ et al (1990) A preliminary evaluation of the research experiences of the research experiences for undergraduates (REU) program of the national science foundation. Program Evaluation Staff, Office of Budget and Control, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC Fitzsimmons SJ et al (1990) A preliminary evaluation of the research experiences of the research experiences for undergraduates (REU) program of the national science foundation. Program Evaluation Staff, Office of Budget and Control, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC
16.
go back to reference Colditz GA, Wolin KY (2011) Transdisciplinary training in cancer prevention: reflections on two decades of training. J Cancer Educ 26(3):586–590PubMedCrossRef Colditz GA, Wolin KY (2011) Transdisciplinary training in cancer prevention: reflections on two decades of training. J Cancer Educ 26(3):586–590PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Introducing Students to Cancer Prevention Careers through Programmed Summer Research Experiences
Authors
Carrie Cameron
Candice L. Collie
Shine Chang
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-011-0297-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Journal of Cancer Education 2/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine