Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 8/2010

01-08-2010 | Reports of Original Investigations

Intravenous lidocaine does not reduce length of hospital stay following abdominal hysterectomy

Authors: Gregory L. Bryson, MD, Ilia Charapov, MD, Gregory Krolczyk, MD, Monica Taljaard, PhD, Dennis Reid, MB ChB

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 8/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Intravenous lidocaine given both intraoperatively and postoperatively decreases pain scores, reduces opioid consumption, and promotes faster return of bowel function following abdominal surgery. The purpose of this trial was to determine if intravenous lidocaine limited to the intraoperative period reduces length of hospital stay and improves functional recovery following abdominal hysterectomy.

Methods

Following Research Ethics Board approval and informed consent, women of American Society of Anesthesiologists’ class I and II undergoing abdominal hysterectomy were assigned randomly to lidocaine and control groups. Lidocaine subjects received an intravenous bolus of 1.5 mg·kg−1 followed by an infusion of 3 mg·kg−1·hr−1, while control subjects received matching placebo. Patients, anesthesiologists, and study personnel were blinded, and anesthesia and multimodal perioperative analgesia were standardized. The primary outcome of this trial was discharge from hospital on or before the second postoperative day (POD2). Additional criteria were assessed for secondary outcomes, i.e., discharge fitness on POD2, length of hospital stay, opioid use, numeric rating scores for pain, quality of recovery, and recovery of bowel function.

Results

Ninety of the 93 women who were recruited completed the study protocol. The characteristics of the patients in both groups were similar—lidocaine group (n = 44) and control group (n = 46)—and no difference was noted between groups in the numbers of women discharged from hospital on POD2 (10 lidocaine, 15 control; P = 0.295). Days to discharge fitness (P = 0.666) and length of hospital stay (P = 0.456) were also similar. Differences in opioid consumption, pain scores, and recovery were neither clinically nor statistically significant.

Conclusion

Intraoperative administration of intravenous lidocaine did not reduce hospital stay or improve objective measures of analgesia and recovery following abdominal hysterectomy. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00382499).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Millar WJ. Hysterectomy rates 1981/82 to 1996/97. Statistics Canada. 2001.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Philip BK, Reese PR, Burch SP. The economic impact of opioids on postoperative pain management. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14: 354-64.CrossRefPubMed Philip BK, Reese PR, Burch SP. The economic impact of opioids on postoperative pain management. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14: 354-64.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Marret E, Rolin M, Beaussier M, Bonnet F. Meta-analysis of intravenous lidocaine and postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1331-8.CrossRefPubMed Marret E, Rolin M, Beaussier M, Bonnet F. Meta-analysis of intravenous lidocaine and postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1331-8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 1191-4.CrossRefPubMed Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 1191-4.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mendoza TR, Chen C, Brugger A, et al. The utility and validity of the modified brief pain inventory in a multiple-dose postoperative analgesic trial. Clin J Pain 2004; 20: 357-62.CrossRefPubMed Mendoza TR, Chen C, Brugger A, et al. The utility and validity of the modified brief pain inventory in a multiple-dose postoperative analgesic trial. Clin J Pain 2004; 20: 357-62.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, et al. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 83-90.CrossRefPubMed Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, et al. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 83-90.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O. SAS for Mixed Models. 2nd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc; 2006. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O. SAS for Mixed Models. 2nd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc; 2006.
7.
go back to reference Chung F. Recovery pattern and home-readiness after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 896-902.CrossRefPubMed Chung F. Recovery pattern and home-readiness after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 896-902.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Laster MJ, Eger EI II, Sharma M, Sonner JM. Lidocaine, MK-801, and MAC. Anesth Analg 2007; 104: 1098-102.CrossRefPubMed Zhang Y, Laster MJ, Eger EI II, Sharma M, Sonner JM. Lidocaine, MK-801, and MAC. Anesth Analg 2007; 104: 1098-102.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hodgson PS, Liu SS. Epidural lidocaine decreases sevoflurane requirement for adequate depth of anesthesia as measured by the bispectral index monitor. Anesthesiology 2001; 94: 799-803.CrossRefPubMed Hodgson PS, Liu SS. Epidural lidocaine decreases sevoflurane requirement for adequate depth of anesthesia as measured by the bispectral index monitor. Anesthesiology 2001; 94: 799-803.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Antognini JF, Carstens E. Macroscopic sites of anesthetic action: brain versus spinal cord. Toxicol Lett 1998; 100-101: 51-8.CrossRefPubMed Antognini JF, Carstens E. Macroscopic sites of anesthetic action: brain versus spinal cord. Toxicol Lett 1998; 100-101: 51-8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Intravenous lidocaine does not reduce length of hospital stay following abdominal hysterectomy
Authors
Gregory L. Bryson, MD
Ilia Charapov, MD
Gregory Krolczyk, MD
Monica Taljaard, PhD
Dennis Reid, MB ChB
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 8/2010
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-010-9332-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2010

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 8/2010 Go to the issue