Skip to main content
Top
Published in: American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 1/2016

01-02-2016 | Original Research Article

Intravenous Clopidogrel (MDCO-157) Compared with Oral Clopidogrel: The Randomized Cross-Over AMPHORE Study

Authors: Jean-Philippe Collet, Christian Funck-Brentano, Jayne Prats, Joe-Elie Salem, Jean-Sébastien Hulot, Edith Guilloux, Ming-yi Hu, Kan He, Johanne Silvain, Vanessa Gallois, Delphine Brugier, Ghalia Anzaha, Sophie Galier, Nathalie Nicolas, Gilles Montalescot

Published in: American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The extent of P2Y12 inhibition during coronary intervention is an important determinant of ischemic complications. The currently available oral P2Y12 inhibitors are limited by a relatively slow onset of action and variable on-treatment response.

Objective

Our objective was to determine the pharmacodynamic (PD) dose–antiplatelet response relationship and the pharmacokinetics of MDCO-157, an intravenous formulation of clopidogrel complexed with sulphobutylether betacyclodextrin, and to identify the dose level of MDCO-157 that matches the PD effect of oral clopidogrel 300 mg.

Methodology

A randomized open-label crossover study was performed in 33 healthy adult volunteers to determine the pharmacokinetic (clopidogrel and clopidogrel H4 thiol active metabolite) and the PD (vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein [VASP]) effects of MDCO-157 at doses of 75, 150, and 300 mg and of oral clopidogrel 300 mg.

Results

Data are presented as %, mean (standard deviation). The maximum effect of P2Y12 receptor inhibition assessed by flow cytometry using VASP was 70.42 (6.7), 69.45 (7.1), and 65.58 (12.6) for intravenous MDCO-157 at doses of 75, 150, and 300 mg, respectively, compared with 56.6 (17.5) with oral clopidogrel 300 mg administration (p < 0.0001). Intravenous administration of MDCO-157 led to a stepwise increase in plasma exposure of clopidogrel, higher than with administration of an oral dose of 300 mg (p < 0.0001). Plasma exposure of H4-thiol also increased with intravenous dose (3.6 ± 2.6, 6.9 ± 4.6, and 12.4 ± 9.1 h·ng/ml for intravenous 75, 150, and 300 mg, respectively) but was lower than with oral administration of a 300-mg dose (34.0 ± 16.0 h.ng/ml; pairwise p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

MDCO-157, an intravenous formulation of clopidogrel complexed with sulphobutylether betacyclodextrin, did not show significant platelet inhibition when administered at doses up to 300 mg. Higher doses with longer infusion may be needed to reach a sufficient threshold of active metabolite generation.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01860105.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Savi P, Labouret C, Delesque N, Guette F, Lupker J, Herbert JM. P2Y(12), a new platelet ADP receptor, target of clopidogrel. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;283:379–83.PubMedCrossRef Savi P, Labouret C, Delesque N, Guette F, Lupker J, Herbert JM. P2Y(12), a new platelet ADP receptor, target of clopidogrel. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;283:379–83.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Savi P, Pereillo JM, Uzabiaga MF, et al. Identification and biological activity of the active metabolite of clopidogrel. Thromb Haemost. 2000;84:891–6.PubMed Savi P, Pereillo JM, Uzabiaga MF, et al. Identification and biological activity of the active metabolite of clopidogrel. Thromb Haemost. 2000;84:891–6.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Collet J-P, Hulot J-S, Anzaha G, et al. High doses of clopidogrel to overcome genetic resistance: the randomized crossover CLOVIS-2 (Clopidogrel and Response Variability Investigation Study 2). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:392–402.PubMedCrossRef Collet J-P, Hulot J-S, Anzaha G, et al. High doses of clopidogrel to overcome genetic resistance: the randomized crossover CLOVIS-2 (Clopidogrel and Response Variability Investigation Study 2). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:392–402.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bellemain-Appaix A, O’Connor SA, Silvain J, et al. Association of clopidogrel pretreatment with mortality, cardiovascular events, and major bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012;308:2507–16.PubMedCrossRef Bellemain-Appaix A, O’Connor SA, Silvain J, et al. Association of clopidogrel pretreatment with mortality, cardiovascular events, and major bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012;308:2507–16.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bellemain-Appaix A, Brieger D, Beygui F, et al. New P2Y12 inhibitors versus clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(19):1542–51.PubMedCrossRef Bellemain-Appaix A, Brieger D, Beygui F, et al. New P2Y12 inhibitors versus clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(19):1542–51.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Montalescot G, Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, et al. Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9665):723–31.PubMedCrossRef Montalescot G, Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, et al. Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9665):723–31.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Steg PG, James S, Harrington RA, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with st-elevation acute coronary syndromes intended for reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a platelet inhibition and patient outcomes (PLATO) trial subgroup analysis. Circulation. 2010;122(21):2131–41.PubMedCrossRef Steg PG, James S, Harrington RA, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with st-elevation acute coronary syndromes intended for reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a platelet inhibition and patient outcomes (PLATO) trial subgroup analysis. Circulation. 2010;122(21):2131–41.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Montalescot G, van’t Hof AW, Lapostolle F, et al. Prehospital ticagrelor in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1016–27.PubMedCrossRef Montalescot G, van’t Hof AW, Lapostolle F, et al. Prehospital ticagrelor in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1016–27.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Gkizas V, et al. Randomized assessment of ticagrelor versus prasugrel antiplatelet effects in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:797–804.PubMedCrossRef Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Gkizas V, et al. Randomized assessment of ticagrelor versus prasugrel antiplatelet effects in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:797–804.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Franchi F, Angiolillo DJ. Novel antiplatelet agents in acute coronary syndrome. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12:30–47.PubMedCrossRef Franchi F, Angiolillo DJ. Novel antiplatelet agents in acute coronary syndrome. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12:30–47.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Hamm CW, et al. Effect of cangrelor on periprocedural outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions: a pooled analysis of patient-level data. Lancet. 2013;382:1981–92.PubMedCrossRef Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Hamm CW, et al. Effect of cangrelor on periprocedural outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions: a pooled analysis of patient-level data. Lancet. 2013;382:1981–92.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bhatt DL, Stone GW, Mahaffey KW, et al. Effect of platelet inhibition with cangrelor during PCI on ischemic events. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1303–13.PubMedCrossRef Bhatt DL, Stone GW, Mahaffey KW, et al. Effect of platelet inhibition with cangrelor during PCI on ischemic events. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1303–13.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rollini F, Franchi F, Tello-Montoliu A, et al. Pharmacodynamic effects of cangrelor on platelet P2Y12 receptor-mediated signaling in prasugrel-treated patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:426–34.PubMedCrossRef Rollini F, Franchi F, Tello-Montoliu A, et al. Pharmacodynamic effects of cangrelor on platelet P2Y12 receptor-mediated signaling in prasugrel-treated patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:426–34.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Angiolillo DJ, Schneider DJ, Bhatt DL, et al. Pharmacodynamic effects of cangrelor and clopidogrel: the platelet function substudy from the cangrelor versus standard therapy to achieve optimal management of platelet inhibition (CHAMPION) trials. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2012;34:44–55.PubMedCrossRef Angiolillo DJ, Schneider DJ, Bhatt DL, et al. Pharmacodynamic effects of cangrelor and clopidogrel: the platelet function substudy from the cangrelor versus standard therapy to achieve optimal management of platelet inhibition (CHAMPION) trials. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2012;34:44–55.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schneider DJ, Agarwal Z, Seecheran N, Keating FK, Gogo P. Pharmacodynamic effects during the transition between cangrelor and ticagrelor. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:435–42.PubMedCrossRef Schneider DJ, Agarwal Z, Seecheran N, Keating FK, Gogo P. Pharmacodynamic effects during the transition between cangrelor and ticagrelor. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:435–42.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schneider DJ, Seecheran N, Raza SS, Keating FK, Gogo P. Pharmacodynamic effects during the transition between cangrelor and prasugrel. Coron Artery Dis. 2015;26:42–8.PubMedCrossRef Schneider DJ, Seecheran N, Raza SS, Keating FK, Gogo P. Pharmacodynamic effects during the transition between cangrelor and prasugrel. Coron Artery Dis. 2015;26:42–8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cushing DJ, Souney PF, Cooper WD, et al. Pharmacokinetics and platelet aggregation inhibitory effects of a novel intravenous formulation of clopidogrel in humans: effects of intravenous clopidogrel. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2012;39:3–8.PubMedCrossRef Cushing DJ, Souney PF, Cooper WD, et al. Pharmacokinetics and platelet aggregation inhibitory effects of a novel intravenous formulation of clopidogrel in humans: effects of intravenous clopidogrel. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2012;39:3–8.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Williams EJ. Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Aust J Sci Res 1949;2(3):149–168 Williams EJ. Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Aust J Sci Res 1949;2(3):149–168
21.
go back to reference Montalescot G, Sideris G, Meuleman C, et al. A randomized comparison of high clopidogrel loading doses in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the ALBION (Assessment of the Best Loading Dose of Clopidogrel to Blunt Platelet Activation, Inflammation and Ongoing Necrosis) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:931–8.PubMedCrossRef Montalescot G, Sideris G, Meuleman C, et al. A randomized comparison of high clopidogrel loading doses in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the ALBION (Assessment of the Best Loading Dose of Clopidogrel to Blunt Platelet Activation, Inflammation and Ongoing Necrosis) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:931–8.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Collet JP, Silvain J, Landivier A, et al. Dose-effect of clopidogrel re-loading in patients already on 75 mg maintenance dose: the RELOAD study. Circulation. 2008;118:1225–33.PubMedCrossRef Collet JP, Silvain J, Landivier A, et al. Dose-effect of clopidogrel re-loading in patients already on 75 mg maintenance dose: the RELOAD study. Circulation. 2008;118:1225–33.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Simon N, Finzi J, Cayla G, Montalescot G, Collet JP, Hulot JS. Omeprazole, pantoprazole, and CYP2C19 effects on clopidogrel pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships in stable coronary artery disease patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2015;71(9):1059–66PubMedCrossRef Simon N, Finzi J, Cayla G, Montalescot G, Collet JP, Hulot JS. Omeprazole, pantoprazole, and CYP2C19 effects on clopidogrel pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships in stable coronary artery disease patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2015;71(9):1059–66PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Pena A, Collet JP, Hulot JS, et al. Can we override clopidogrel resistance? Circulation. 2009;119(21):2854–8.PubMedCrossRef Pena A, Collet JP, Hulot JS, et al. Can we override clopidogrel resistance? Circulation. 2009;119(21):2854–8.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hulot JS, Collet JP, Cayla G, et al. CYP2C19 but not PON1 genetic variants influence clopidogrel pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical efficacy in post-myocardial infarction patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:422–8.PubMedCrossRef Hulot JS, Collet JP, Cayla G, et al. CYP2C19 but not PON1 genetic variants influence clopidogrel pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical efficacy in post-myocardial infarction patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:422–8.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Frelinger AL 3rd, Bhatt DL, Lee RD, et al. Clopidogrel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics vary widely despite exclusion or control of polymorphisms (CYP2C19, ABCB1, PON1), noncompliance, diet, smoking, co-medications (including proton pump inhibitors), and pre-existent variability in platelet function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:872–9.PubMedCrossRef Frelinger AL 3rd, Bhatt DL, Lee RD, et al. Clopidogrel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics vary widely despite exclusion or control of polymorphisms (CYP2C19, ABCB1, PON1), noncompliance, diet, smoking, co-medications (including proton pump inhibitors), and pre-existent variability in platelet function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:872–9.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Windecker S, Alfonso F, Collet J-P, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the task force on myocardial revascularization of the ESC/EACTS Developed with the special contribution of the EAPCI. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2541–619.PubMedCrossRef Windecker S, Alfonso F, Collet J-P, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the task force on myocardial revascularization of the ESC/EACTS Developed with the special contribution of the EAPCI. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2541–619.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intravenous Clopidogrel (MDCO-157) Compared with Oral Clopidogrel: The Randomized Cross-Over AMPHORE Study
Authors
Jean-Philippe Collet
Christian Funck-Brentano
Jayne Prats
Joe-Elie Salem
Jean-Sébastien Hulot
Edith Guilloux
Ming-yi Hu
Kan He
Johanne Silvain
Vanessa Gallois
Delphine Brugier
Ghalia Anzaha
Sophie Galier
Nathalie Nicolas
Gilles Montalescot
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1175-3277
Electronic ISSN: 1179-187X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-015-0145-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 1/2016 Go to the issue