Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 5/2012

01-05-2012 | Reports of Original Investigations

Intrathecally administered ropivacaine is less neurotoxic than procaine, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine in a rat spinal model

Authors: Tamie Takenami, MD, Guoqin Wang, MD, PhD, Yoshihiro Nara, DVM, Sayano Fukushima, MD, PhD, Saburo Yagishita, MD, PhD, Hiromi Hiruma, MD, PhD, Tadashi Kawakami, MD, PhD, Hirotsugu Okamoto, MD, PhD

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the neurotoxicity of intrathecal procaine, bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine in an animal model.

Methods

The study comprised two experiments. In the concentration experiment, rats (n = 78) were administered 0.12 μL·g−1 body weight (BW) of 2% or 20% procaine, 0.5% or 5% bupivacaine, 0.5% or 5% levobupivacaine, or 0.5% or 5% ropivacaine. Based on the findings, the doses were increased by volume in the subsequent volume experiment using 0.12, 0.24, or 0.48 μL·g−1 BW of 6% procaine, 6% levobupivacaine, or 6% ropivacaine (n = 79). Walking behaviour and sensory threshold were analyzed, and a histological examination of the spinal cord, posterior and anterior roots, and cauda equina was performed.

Results

The concentration experiment showed abnormalities only in the 5% bupivacaine group, and these abnormal findings were in the posterior root (PR) and posterior column (PC). The volume experiment revealed that procaine 0.24 μL·g−1 was neurotoxic, mainly affecting the PR. At 0.48 μL·g−1, severe injury was observed in the PR and PC in all six procaine rats and four of six levobupivacaine rats, while milder injury was limited to the PR in one of six ropivacaine rats, which differed significantly from the former two groups (P = 0.006 and P = 0.014, respectively). Electron microscopy showed axonal degeneration.

Conclusion

All four local anesthetics seemed to cause identical neurotoxic lesions commencing in the PR and extending to the PC by axonal degeneration. Bupivacaine appeared to be the most neurotoxic of the four drugs, and the neurotoxicity at higher doses increased by volume with procaine > levobupivacaine > ropivacaine.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Albright GA. Cardiac arrest following regional anesthesia with etidocaine or bupivacaine. Anesthesiology 1979; 51: 285-7.PubMedCrossRef Albright GA. Cardiac arrest following regional anesthesia with etidocaine or bupivacaine. Anesthesiology 1979; 51: 285-7.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Zink W, Graf BM. Benefit-risk assessment of ropivacaine in the management of postoperative pain. Drug Saf 2004; 27: 1093-114.PubMedCrossRef Zink W, Graf BM. Benefit-risk assessment of ropivacaine in the management of postoperative pain. Drug Saf 2004; 27: 1093-114.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mather LE. Stereochemistry in anaesthetic and analgetic drugs. Minerva Anestesiol 2005; 71: 507-16.PubMed Mather LE. Stereochemistry in anaesthetic and analgetic drugs. Minerva Anestesiol 2005; 71: 507-16.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Groban L. Central nervous system and cardiac effects from long-acting amide local anesthetic toxicity in the intact animal model. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003; 28: 3-11.PubMed Groban L. Central nervous system and cardiac effects from long-acting amide local anesthetic toxicity in the intact animal model. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003; 28: 3-11.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Huang YF, Pryor ME, Mather LE, Veering BT. Cardiovascular and central nervous system effects of intravenous levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in sheep. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 797-804.PubMed Huang YF, Pryor ME, Mather LE, Veering BT. Cardiovascular and central nervous system effects of intravenous levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in sheep. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 797-804.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Knudsen K, Beckman Suurkula M, Blomberg S, Sjovall J, Edvardsson N. Central nervous and cardiovascular effects of i.v. infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 507-14.PubMed Knudsen K, Beckman Suurkula M, Blomberg S, Sjovall J, Edvardsson N. Central nervous and cardiovascular effects of i.v. infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 507-14.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Groban L, Deal DD, Vernon JC, James RL, Butterworth J. Does local anesthetic stereoselectivity or structure predict myocardial depression in anesthetized canines? Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002; 27: 460-8.PubMed Groban L, Deal DD, Vernon JC, James RL, Butterworth J. Does local anesthetic stereoselectivity or structure predict myocardial depression in anesthetized canines? Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002; 27: 460-8.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Bardsley H, Gristwood R, Baker H, Watson N, Nimmo W. A comparison of the cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and rac-bupivacaine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 46: 245-9.PubMedCrossRef Bardsley H, Gristwood R, Baker H, Watson N, Nimmo W. A comparison of the cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and rac-bupivacaine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 46: 245-9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Takenami T, Yagishita S, Asato F, Hoka S. Neurotoxicity of intrathecally administered tetracaine commences at the posterior root near entry into the spinal cord. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000; 25: 372-9.PubMed Takenami T, Yagishita S, Asato F, Hoka S. Neurotoxicity of intrathecally administered tetracaine commences at the posterior root near entry into the spinal cord. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000; 25: 372-9.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Takenami T, Yagishita S, Nara Y, Hoka S. Intrathecal mepivacaine and prilocaine are less neurotoxic than lidocaine in a rat intrathecal model. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2004; 29: 446-53.PubMed Takenami T, Yagishita S, Nara Y, Hoka S. Intrathecal mepivacaine and prilocaine are less neurotoxic than lidocaine in a rat intrathecal model. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2004; 29: 446-53.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Takenami T, Yagishita S, Murase S, Hiruma H, Kawakami T, Hoka S. Neurotoxicity of intrathecally administered bupivacaine involves the posterior roots/posterior white matter and is milder than lidocaine in rats. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2005; 30: 464-72.PubMed Takenami T, Yagishita S, Murase S, Hiruma H, Kawakami T, Hoka S. Neurotoxicity of intrathecally administered bupivacaine involves the posterior roots/posterior white matter and is milder than lidocaine in rats. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2005; 30: 464-72.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Takenami T, Yagishita S, Nara Y, et al. Spinal procaine is less neurotoxic than mepivacaine, prilocaine and bupivacaine in rats. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009; 34: 189-95.PubMedCrossRef Takenami T, Yagishita S, Nara Y, et al. Spinal procaine is less neurotoxic than mepivacaine, prilocaine and bupivacaine in rats. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009; 34: 189-95.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stoelting RK, Miller RD. Local anesthetics. In: Stoelting RK, Miller RD, editors. Basics of Anesthesia. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p. 80-8. Stoelting RK, Miller RD. Local anesthetics. In: Stoelting RK, Miller RD, editors. Basics of Anesthesia. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p. 80-8.
14.
go back to reference Miller RD, Katzung BG. Local anesthetics. In: Katzung BG, editor. Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. 8th ed. New York: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill; 2001. p. 436-45. Miller RD, Katzung BG. Local anesthetics. In: Katzung BG, editor. Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. 8th ed. New York: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill; 2001. p. 436-45.
15.
16.
go back to reference Zaric D, Christiansen C, Pace NL, Puniasawadwong Y. Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anesthetics: a systemic review of randomized, controlled trials. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1811-6.PubMedCrossRef Zaric D, Christiansen C, Pace NL, Puniasawadwong Y. Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anesthetics: a systemic review of randomized, controlled trials. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1811-6.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Yaksh TL, Rudy TA. Chronic catheterization of the spinal subarachnoid space. Physiol Behav 1976; 77: 1031-6.CrossRef Yaksh TL, Rudy TA. Chronic catheterization of the spinal subarachnoid space. Physiol Behav 1976; 77: 1031-6.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Casati A, Putzu M. Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: are they clinically different? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2005; 19: 247-68.PubMedCrossRef Casati A, Putzu M. Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: are they clinically different? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2005; 19: 247-68.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Radwan IA, Saito S, Goto F. The neurotoxicity of local anesthetics on growing neurons: a comparative study of lidocaine, bupivacaine, mepivacaine and ropivacaine. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 319-24.PubMed Radwan IA, Saito S, Goto F. The neurotoxicity of local anesthetics on growing neurons: a comparative study of lidocaine, bupivacaine, mepivacaine and ropivacaine. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 319-24.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Kasaba T, Onizuka S, Takasaki M. Procaine and mepivacaine have less toxicity in vitro than other clinically used local anesthetics. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 85-90.PubMedCrossRef Kasaba T, Onizuka S, Takasaki M. Procaine and mepivacaine have less toxicity in vitro than other clinically used local anesthetics. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 85-90.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Malinovsky JM, Charles F, Baudrimont M, et al. Intrathecal ropivacaine in rabbits: pharmacodynamic and neurotoxicologic study. Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 429-35.PubMedCrossRef Malinovsky JM, Charles F, Baudrimont M, et al. Intrathecal ropivacaine in rabbits: pharmacodynamic and neurotoxicologic study. Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 429-35.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Yamashita A, Matsumoto M, Matsumoto S, Ito M, Kawai K, Sakabe T. A comparison of the neurotoxic effect on the spinal cord of tetracaine, lidocaine, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine administered intrathecally in rabbits. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 512-9.PubMedCrossRef Yamashita A, Matsumoto M, Matsumoto S, Ito M, Kawai K, Sakabe T. A comparison of the neurotoxic effect on the spinal cord of tetracaine, lidocaine, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine administered intrathecally in rabbits. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 512-9.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Muguruma T, Sakura S, Kirihara Y, Saito Y. Comparative somatic and visceral antinociception and neurotoxicity of intrathecal bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and dextrobupivacaine in rats. Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 1249-56.PubMedCrossRef Muguruma T, Sakura S, Kirihara Y, Saito Y. Comparative somatic and visceral antinociception and neurotoxicity of intrathecal bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and dextrobupivacaine in rats. Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 1249-56.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rigler ML, Drasner K, Krejcie TC, et al. Cauda equina syndrome after continuous spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1991; 72: 275-81.PubMedCrossRef Rigler ML, Drasner K, Krejcie TC, et al. Cauda equina syndrome after continuous spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1991; 72: 275-81.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hartric CT. Transient radicular irritation: a misnomer? Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 1392-3. Hartric CT. Transient radicular irritation: a misnomer? Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 1392-3.
Metadata
Title
Intrathecally administered ropivacaine is less neurotoxic than procaine, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine in a rat spinal model
Authors
Tamie Takenami, MD
Guoqin Wang, MD, PhD
Yoshihiro Nara, DVM
Sayano Fukushima, MD, PhD
Saburo Yagishita, MD, PhD
Hiromi Hiruma, MD, PhD
Tadashi Kawakami, MD, PhD
Hirotsugu Okamoto, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-05-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-012-9685-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 5/2012 Go to the issue