Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurocritical Care 3/2023

01-09-2022 | Intracranial Hypertension | Original work

Assessment of Cerebral Autoregulation Using Invasive and Noninvasive Methods of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring

Authors: Catherine E. Hassett, S. Pinar Uysal, Robert Butler, Nina Z. Moore, Danilo Cardim, Joao A. Gomes

Published in: Neurocritical Care | Issue 3/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pulse amplitude index (PAx), a descriptor of cerebrovascular reactivity, correlates the changes of the pulse amplitude of the intracranial pressure (ICP) waveform (AMP) with changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP). AMP relies on cerebrovascular compliance, which is modulated by the state of the cerebrovascular reactivity. PAx can aid in prognostication after acute brain injuries as a tool for the assessment of cerebral autoregulation and could potentially tailor individual management; however, invasive measurements are required for its calculation. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between noninvasive PAx (nPAx) derived from a novel noninvasive device for ICP monitoring and PAx derived from gold standard invasive methods.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed invasive ICP (external ventricular drain) and non-invasive ICP (nICP), via mechanical extensometer (Brain4Care Corp.). Invasive and non-invasive ICP waveform morphology data was collected in adult patients with brain injury with arterial blood pressure monitoring. The time series from all signals were first treated to remove movement artifacts. PAx and nPAx were calculated as the moving correlation coefficients of 10-s averages of AMP or non-invasive AMP (nAMP) and MAP. AMP/nAMP was determined by calculating the fundamental frequency amplitude of the ICP/nICP signal over a 10-s window, updated every 10-s. We then evaluated the relationship between invasive PAx and noninvasive nPAx using the methods of repeated-measures analysis to generate an estimate of the correlation coefficient and its 95% confidence interval (CI). The agreement between the two methods was assessed using the Bland–Altman test.

Results

Twenty-four patients were identified. The median age was 53.5 years (interquartile range 40–70), and intracranial hemorrhage (84%) was the most common etiology. Twenty-one (87.5%) patients underwent mechanical ventilation, and 60% were sedated with a median Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 (7–15). Mean PAx was 0.0296 ± 0.331, and nPAx was 0.0171 ± 0.332. The correlation between PAx and nPAx was strong (R = 0.70, p < 0.0005, 95% CI 0.687–0.717). Bland–Altman analysis showed excellent agreement, with a bias of − 0.018 (95% CI − 0.026 to − 0.01) and a localized regression trend line that did not deviate from 0.

Conclusions

PAx can be calculated by conventional and noninvasive ICP monitoring in a statistically significant evaluation with strong agreement. Further study of the applications of this clinical tool is warranted, with the goal of early therapeutic intervention to improve neurologic outcomes following acute brain injuries.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Donnelly J, Aries MJ, Czosnyka M. Further understanding of cerebral autoregulation at the bedside: possible implications for future therapy. Expert Rev Neurother. 2015;15(2):169–85.CrossRefPubMed Donnelly J, Aries MJ, Czosnyka M. Further understanding of cerebral autoregulation at the bedside: possible implications for future therapy. Expert Rev Neurother. 2015;15(2):169–85.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Castro P, Azevedo E, Sorond F. Cerebral autoregulation in Stroke. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2018;20(8):37.CrossRefPubMed Castro P, Azevedo E, Sorond F. Cerebral autoregulation in Stroke. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2018;20(8):37.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Aries MJ, Czosnyka M, Budohoski KP, et al. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular reactivity using pulse waveform of intracranial pressure. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17(1):67–76.CrossRefPubMed Aries MJ, Czosnyka M, Budohoski KP, et al. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular reactivity using pulse waveform of intracranial pressure. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17(1):67–76.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Radolovich DK, Aries MJ, Castellani G, et al. Pulsatile intracranial pressure and cerebral autoregulation after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15(3):379–86.CrossRefPubMed Radolovich DK, Aries MJ, Castellani G, et al. Pulsatile intracranial pressure and cerebral autoregulation after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15(3):379–86.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Reinhard M, Neunhoeffer F, Gerds TA, et al. Secondary decline of cerebral autoregulation is associated with worse outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:264–71.CrossRefPubMed Reinhard M, Neunhoeffer F, Gerds TA, et al. Secondary decline of cerebral autoregulation is associated with worse outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:264–71.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ma H, Guo ZN, Liu J, et al. Temporal course of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2016;47:674–81.CrossRefPubMed Ma H, Guo ZN, Liu J, et al. Temporal course of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2016;47:674–81.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rivera-Lara L, Zorrilla-Vaca A, Geocadin RG, et al. Cerebral autoregulation-oriented therapy at the bedside: a comprehensive review. Anesthesiology. 2017;126(6):1187–99.CrossRefPubMed Rivera-Lara L, Zorrilla-Vaca A, Geocadin RG, et al. Cerebral autoregulation-oriented therapy at the bedside: a comprehensive review. Anesthesiology. 2017;126(6):1187–99.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sorrentino E, Diedler J, Kasprowicz M, et al. Critical thresholds for cerebrovascular reactivity after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2012;16(2):258–66.CrossRefPubMed Sorrentino E, Diedler J, Kasprowicz M, et al. Critical thresholds for cerebrovascular reactivity after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2012;16(2):258–66.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Steiner LA, Czosnyka M, Piechnik SK, et al. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity allows determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(4):733–8.CrossRefPubMed Steiner LA, Czosnyka M, Piechnik SK, et al. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity allows determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(4):733–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Czosnyka M, Miller C. Participants in the international multidisciplinary consensus conference on multimodality monitoring. Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation. Neurocrit Care. 2014;21(Suppl 2):S95-102.CrossRefPubMed Czosnyka M, Miller C. Participants in the international multidisciplinary consensus conference on multimodality monitoring. Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation. Neurocrit Care. 2014;21(Suppl 2):S95-102.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Selb J, Wu KC, Sutin J, et al. Prolonged monitoring of cerebral blood flow and autoregulation with diffuse correlation spectroscopy in neurocritical care patients. Neurophotonics. 2018;5(4): 045005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Selb J, Wu KC, Sutin J, et al. Prolonged monitoring of cerebral blood flow and autoregulation with diffuse correlation spectroscopy in neurocritical care patients. Neurophotonics. 2018;5(4): 045005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Panerai RB. Transcranial doppler for evaluation of cerebral autoregulation. Clin Auton Res. 2009;19(4):197–211.CrossRefPubMed Panerai RB. Transcranial doppler for evaluation of cerebral autoregulation. Clin Auton Res. 2009;19(4):197–211.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Cabella B, Vilela GH, Mascarenhas S, et al. Validation of a new noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring method by direct comparison with an invasive technique. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2016;122:93–6.CrossRefPubMed Cabella B, Vilela GH, Mascarenhas S, et al. Validation of a new noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring method by direct comparison with an invasive technique. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2016;122:93–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Frigieri G, Andrade RAP, Dias C, et al. Analysis of a non-invasive intracranial pressure monitoring method in patients with traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2018;126:107–10.CrossRefPubMed Frigieri G, Andrade RAP, Dias C, et al. Analysis of a non-invasive intracranial pressure monitoring method in patients with traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2018;126:107–10.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mascarenhas S, Vilela GHF, Carlotti C, et al. The new ICP minimally invasive method shows that the monrokellie doctrine is not valid. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2012;114:117–20.CrossRefPubMed Mascarenhas S, Vilela GHF, Carlotti C, et al. The new ICP minimally invasive method shows that the monrokellie doctrine is not valid. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2012;114:117–20.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference de Moraes FM, Rocha E, Barros FCD, et al. Waveform morphology as a surrogate for ICP monitoring: a comparison between an invasive and a noninvasive method. Neurocrit Care. 2022;24:1–9. de Moraes FM, Rocha E, Barros FCD, et al. Waveform morphology as a surrogate for ICP monitoring: a comparison between an invasive and a noninvasive method. Neurocrit Care. 2022;24:1–9.
20.
go back to reference Holm S, Eide PK. The frequency domain versus time domain methods for processing of intracranial pressure (ICP) signals. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30(2):164–70.CrossRefPubMed Holm S, Eide PK. The frequency domain versus time domain methods for processing of intracranial pressure (ICP) signals. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30(2):164–70.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bentsen G, Stubhaug A, Eide PK. Differential effects of osmotherapy on static and pulsatile intracranial pressure. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(8):2414–9.CrossRefPubMed Bentsen G, Stubhaug A, Eide PK. Differential effects of osmotherapy on static and pulsatile intracranial pressure. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(8):2414–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Eide PK, Sorteberg W. Intracranial pressure levels and single wave amplitudes, Glasgow Coma Score and Glasgow Outcome Score after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006;148(12):1267–75.CrossRefPubMed Eide PK, Sorteberg W. Intracranial pressure levels and single wave amplitudes, Glasgow Coma Score and Glasgow Outcome Score after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006;148(12):1267–75.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Andrade RDAP, et al. A nanometer resolution wearable wireless medical device for non invasive intracranial pressure monitoring. IEEE Sens J. 2015;21(20):22270–84.CrossRef Andrade RDAP, et al. A nanometer resolution wearable wireless medical device for non invasive intracranial pressure monitoring. IEEE Sens J. 2015;21(20):22270–84.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Carrera E, Kim DJ, Castellani G, et al. What shapes pulse amplitude of intracranial pressure? J Neurotrauma. 2010;27(2):317–24.CrossRefPubMed Carrera E, Kim DJ, Castellani G, et al. What shapes pulse amplitude of intracranial pressure? J Neurotrauma. 2010;27(2):317–24.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Radolovich DK, Aries MJ, Castellani G, et al. Pulsatile intracranial pressure and cerebral autoregulation after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15:379–86.CrossRefPubMed Radolovich DK, Aries MJ, Castellani G, et al. Pulsatile intracranial pressure and cerebral autoregulation after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15:379–86.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Patel HC, Menon DK, Tebbs S, Hawker R, Hutchinson PJ, Kirkpatrick PJ. Specialist neurocritical care and outcome from head injury. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28(5):547–53.CrossRefPubMed Patel HC, Menon DK, Tebbs S, Hawker R, Hutchinson PJ, Kirkpatrick PJ. Specialist neurocritical care and outcome from head injury. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28(5):547–53.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Marmarou A, Lu J, Butcher I, et al. Prognostic value of the Glasgow Coma Scale and pupil reactivity in traumatic brain injury assessed pre-hospital and on enrollment: an IMPACT analysis. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(2):270–80.CrossRefPubMed Marmarou A, Lu J, Butcher I, et al. Prognostic value of the Glasgow Coma Scale and pupil reactivity in traumatic brain injury assessed pre-hospital and on enrollment: an IMPACT analysis. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(2):270–80.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Tas J, Beqiri E, van Kaam CR, et al. An update on the COGiTATE phase II study: feasibility and safety of targeting an optimal cerebral perfusion pressure as a patient-tailored therapy in severe traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2021;131:143–7.CrossRefPubMed Tas J, Beqiri E, van Kaam CR, et al. An update on the COGiTATE phase II study: feasibility and safety of targeting an optimal cerebral perfusion pressure as a patient-tailored therapy in severe traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2021;131:143–7.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Petersen NH, Silverman A, Strander SM, Kodali S, Wang A, Sansing LH, Schindler JL, Falcone GJ, Gilmore EJ, Jasne AS, Cord B, Hebert RM, Johnson M, Matouk CC, Sheth KN. Fixed compared with autoregulation-oriented blood pressure thresholds after mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2020;51(3):914–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Petersen NH, Silverman A, Strander SM, Kodali S, Wang A, Sansing LH, Schindler JL, Falcone GJ, Gilmore EJ, Jasne AS, Cord B, Hebert RM, Johnson M, Matouk CC, Sheth KN. Fixed compared with autoregulation-oriented blood pressure thresholds after mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2020;51(3):914–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Assessment of Cerebral Autoregulation Using Invasive and Noninvasive Methods of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring
Authors
Catherine E. Hassett
S. Pinar Uysal
Robert Butler
Nina Z. Moore
Danilo Cardim
Joao A. Gomes
Publication date
01-09-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Neurocritical Care / Issue 3/2023
Print ISSN: 1541-6933
Electronic ISSN: 1556-0961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01585-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2023

Neurocritical Care 3/2023 Go to the issue