Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2012

01-10-2012 | Original Article

Interviews with patients with advanced cancer—another step towards an international cancer pain classification system

Authors: Anne Kari Knudsen, Nina Aass, Ellen Heitzer, Pål Klepstad, Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Walter Schippinger, Elisabeth Brenne, Stein Kaasa, Elisabet Wasteson, On behalf of the European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC)

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 10/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Patients’ involvement in the development of assessment tools is recommended, and the European Palliative Care Research Collaborative has adhered to this when developing a shared language for cancer pain, an international assessment and classification system. Study objectives were to investigate how patients ranked the relevance of several previously identified pain domains, to investigate patients’ perception of the pain experience and to disclose additional, relevant pain domains for cancer pain classification to those identified in the literature.

Methods

Semistructured interviews with advanced cancer patients treated with opioids were performed and analysed verbatim. Patients scored the relevance of predefined pain domains on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale.

Results

Thirty-three Norwegian and Austrian patients were included (16 females and 17 males); the mean age was 63 years, and the mean Karnofsky performance score was 65. The ranking of domains was as follows etiology (mean Numerical Rating Scale score, 8.5), duration (8.0), intensity (7.4), coping (7.1), physical (5.9) and psychological functioning (5.8). Sleep was identified as a new candidate domain to include in the system. The patients emphasised consequences of having pain, for example, poor physical functioning and psychological distress.

Conclusions

Previously identified pain domains were confirmed to be relevant to the patients; however, the ranking differed from the experts’ ranking. Sleep disturbances may be added as a domain in a future classification system.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bender JL, Hohenadel J, Wong J, Katz J, Ferris LE, Shobbrook C, Warr D, Jadad AR (2008) What patients with cancer want to know about pain: a qualitative study. J Pain Symptom Manage 35:177–187PubMedCrossRef Bender JL, Hohenadel J, Wong J, Katz J, Ferris LE, Shobbrook C, Warr D, Jadad AR (2008) What patients with cancer want to know about pain: a qualitative study. J Pain Symptom Manage 35:177–187PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7:6–9PubMed Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7:6–9PubMed
4.
go back to reference Bruera E, MacMillan K, Hanson J, MacDonald RN (1989) The Edmonton staging system for cancer pain: preliminary report. Pain 37:203–209PubMedCrossRef Bruera E, MacMillan K, Hanson J, MacDonald RN (1989) The Edmonton staging system for cancer pain: preliminary report. Pain 37:203–209PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Coyle N, Tickoo R (2007) Qualitative research: what this research paradigm has to offer to the understanding of pain. Pain Med 8:205–206PubMedCrossRef Coyle N, Tickoo R (2007) Qualitative research: what this research paradigm has to offer to the understanding of pain. Pain Med 8:205–206PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fainsinger RL, Nekolaichuk C, Lawlor P, Hagen N, Bercovitch M, Fisch M, Galloway L, Kaye G, Landman W, Spruyt O, Zhukovsky D, Bruera E, Hanson J (2010) An international multicentre validation study of a pain classification system for cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 46:2896–2904PubMedCrossRef Fainsinger RL, Nekolaichuk C, Lawlor P, Hagen N, Bercovitch M, Fisch M, Galloway L, Kaye G, Landman W, Spruyt O, Zhukovsky D, Bruera E, Hanson J (2010) An international multicentre validation study of a pain classification system for cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 46:2896–2904PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fainsinger RL, Nekolaichuk CL (2008) A “TNM” classification system for cancer pain: The Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP) Support Care Cancer Fainsinger RL, Nekolaichuk CL (2008) A “TNM” classification system for cancer pain: The Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP) Support Care Cancer
9.
go back to reference Fainsinger RL, Nekolaichuk CL, Lawlor PG, Neumann CM, Hanson J, Vigano A (2005) A multicenter study of the revised Edmonton Staging System for classifying cancer pain in advanced cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 29:224–237PubMedCrossRef Fainsinger RL, Nekolaichuk CL, Lawlor PG, Neumann CM, Hanson J, Vigano A (2005) A multicenter study of the revised Edmonton Staging System for classifying cancer pain in advanced cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 29:224–237PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fayers PM (2007) Developing a quationnaire Quality of Life The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Wiley, West Sussex, pp 55–58 Fayers PM (2007) Developing a quationnaire Quality of Life The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Wiley, West Sussex, pp 55–58
11.
go back to reference Fayers PM, Hjermstad MJ, Ranhoff AH, Kaasa S, Skogstad L, Klepstad P, Loge JH (2005) Which Mini-Mental State Exam items can be used to screen for delirium and cognitive impairment? J Pain Symptom Manage 30:41–50PubMedCrossRef Fayers PM, Hjermstad MJ, Ranhoff AH, Kaasa S, Skogstad L, Klepstad P, Loge JH (2005) Which Mini-Mental State Exam items can be used to screen for delirium and cognitive impairment? J Pain Symptom Manage 30:41–50PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference FDA (2006) Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:79CrossRef FDA (2006) Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:79CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198PubMedCrossRef Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Giorgi A (1985) Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In: Giorgi A (ed) Phenomenology and psychological research. Dusquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, pp 8–22 Giorgi A (1985) Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In: Giorgi A (ed) Phenomenology and psychological research. Dusquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, pp 8–22
15.
go back to reference Hjermstad MJ, Fainsinger R, Kaasa S (2009) Assessment and classification of cancer pain. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 3:24–30PubMedCrossRef Hjermstad MJ, Fainsinger R, Kaasa S (2009) Assessment and classification of cancer pain. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 3:24–30PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hjermstad MJ, Gibbins J, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Loge JH, Kaasa S (2008) Pain assessment tools in palliative care: an urgent need for consensus. Palliat Med 22:895–903PubMedCrossRef Hjermstad MJ, Gibbins J, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Loge JH, Kaasa S (2008) Pain assessment tools in palliative care: an urgent need for consensus. Palliat Med 22:895–903PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Holen JC, Hjermstad MJ, Loge JH, Fayers PM, Caraceni A, De CF, Forbes K, Furst CJ, Radbruch L, Kaasa S (2006) Pain assessment tools: is the content appropriate for use in palliative care? J Pain Symptom Manage 32:567–580PubMedCrossRef Holen JC, Hjermstad MJ, Loge JH, Fayers PM, Caraceni A, De CF, Forbes K, Furst CJ, Radbruch L, Kaasa S (2006) Pain assessment tools: is the content appropriate for use in palliative care? J Pain Symptom Manage 32:567–580PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hwang SS, Chang VT, Fairclough DL, Kasimis B (2002) Development of a cancer pain prognostic scale. J Pain Symptom Manage 24:366–378PubMedCrossRef Hwang SS, Chang VT, Fairclough DL, Kasimis B (2002) Development of a cancer pain prognostic scale. J Pain Symptom Manage 24:366–378PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Knudsen AK, Aass N, Fainsinger R, Caraceni A, Klepstad P, Jordhoy M, Hjermstad MJ, Kaasa S (2009) Classification of pain in cancer patients—a systematic literature review. Palliat Med 23:295–308PubMedCrossRef Knudsen AK, Aass N, Fainsinger R, Caraceni A, Klepstad P, Jordhoy M, Hjermstad MJ, Kaasa S (2009) Classification of pain in cancer patients—a systematic literature review. Palliat Med 23:295–308PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kaasa S (2010) An international multicentre validation study of a pain classification system for cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 46:2865–2866PubMedCrossRef Kaasa S (2010) An international multicentre validation study of a pain classification system for cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 46:2865–2866PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kaasa S, Loge JH, Fayers P, Caraceni A, Strasser F, Hjermstad MJ, Higginson I, Radbruch L, Haugen DF (2008) Symptom assessment in palliative care: a need for international collaboration. J Clin Oncol 26:3867–3873PubMedCrossRef Kaasa S, Loge JH, Fayers P, Caraceni A, Strasser F, Hjermstad MJ, Higginson I, Radbruch L, Haugen DF (2008) Symptom assessment in palliative care: a need for international collaboration. J Clin Oncol 26:3867–3873PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Laugsand EA, Jakobsen G, Kaasa S, Klepstad P (2010) Inadequate symptom control in advanced cancer patients across Europe Support Care Cancer Laugsand EA, Jakobsen G, Kaasa S, Klepstad P (2010) Inadequate symptom control in advanced cancer patients across Europe Support Care Cancer
24.
go back to reference Malterud K (2001) Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 358:483–488PubMedCrossRef Malterud K (2001) Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 358:483–488PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Merskey H, Bogduk N (1994) International Association for the Study of Pain: Classification of Chronic Pain. IASP Press, Seattle Merskey H, Bogduk N (1994) International Association for the Study of Pain: Classification of Chronic Pain. IASP Press, Seattle
26.
go back to reference Mystakidou K, Tsilika E, Parpa E, Katsouda E, Galanos A, Vlahos L (2006) Psychological distress of patients with advanced cancer: influence and contribution of pain severity and pain interference. Cancer Nurs 29:400–405PubMedCrossRef Mystakidou K, Tsilika E, Parpa E, Katsouda E, Galanos A, Vlahos L (2006) Psychological distress of patients with advanced cancer: influence and contribution of pain severity and pain interference. Cancer Nurs 29:400–405PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Nekolaichuk CL, Fainsinger RL, Lawlor PG (2005) A validation study of a pain classification system for advanced cancer patients using content experts: the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer. Pain Palliat Med 19:466–476CrossRef Nekolaichuk CL, Fainsinger RL, Lawlor PG (2005) A validation study of a pain classification system for advanced cancer patients using content experts: the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer. Pain Palliat Med 19:466–476CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative designs and data collection: qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 242–246 Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative designs and data collection: qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 242–246
30.
go back to reference Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative interviewing. In: Patton MQ (ed) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 344–347 Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative interviewing. In: Patton MQ (ed) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 344–347
31.
go back to reference Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
33.
go back to reference Reid CM, Gooberman-Hill R, Hanks GW (2008) Opioid analgesics for cancer pain: symptom control for the living or comfort for the dying? A qualitative study to investigate the factors influencing the decision to accept morphine for pain caused by cancer. Ann Oncol 19:44–48PubMedCrossRef Reid CM, Gooberman-Hill R, Hanks GW (2008) Opioid analgesics for cancer pain: symptom control for the living or comfort for the dying? A qualitative study to investigate the factors influencing the decision to accept morphine for pain caused by cancer. Ann Oncol 19:44–48PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Sharma N, Hansen CH, O’Connor M, Walker J, Kleiboer A, Murray G, Espie C, Storey D, Sharpe M (2011) Sleep problems in cancer patients: prevalence and association with distress and pain Psychooncology Jul 1. [Epub ahead of print] Sharma N, Hansen CH, O’Connor M, Walker J, Kleiboer A, Murray G, Espie C, Storey D, Sharpe M (2011) Sleep problems in cancer patients: prevalence and association with distress and pain Psychooncology Jul 1. [Epub ahead of print]
36.
go back to reference Snyder CF, Aaronson NK (2009) Use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Lancet 374:369–370PubMedCrossRef Snyder CF, Aaronson NK (2009) Use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Lancet 374:369–370PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Sprangers MA, Cull A, Groenvold M, Bjordal K, Blazeby J, Aaronson NK (1998) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer approach to developing questionnaire modules: an update and overview. EORTC Qual Life Stud Group Qual Life Res 7:291–300 Sprangers MA, Cull A, Groenvold M, Bjordal K, Blazeby J, Aaronson NK (1998) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer approach to developing questionnaire modules: an update and overview. EORTC Qual Life Stud Group Qual Life Res 7:291–300
38.
go back to reference Sutton LM, Porter LS, Keefe FJ (2002) Cancer pain at the end of life: a biopsychosocial perspective. Pain 99:5–10PubMedCrossRef Sutton LM, Porter LS, Keefe FJ (2002) Cancer pain at the end of life: a biopsychosocial perspective. Pain 99:5–10PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Watanabe S, Nekolaichuk C, Beaumont C, Mawani A (2009) The Edmonton symptom assessment system—what do patients think? Support Care Cancer 17:675–683PubMedCrossRef Watanabe S, Nekolaichuk C, Beaumont C, Mawani A (2009) The Edmonton symptom assessment system—what do patients think? Support Care Cancer 17:675–683PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Interviews with patients with advanced cancer—another step towards an international cancer pain classification system
Authors
Anne Kari Knudsen
Nina Aass
Ellen Heitzer
Pål Klepstad
Marianne Jensen Hjermstad
Walter Schippinger
Elisabeth Brenne
Stein Kaasa
Elisabet Wasteson
On behalf of the European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC)
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 10/2012
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1361-z

Other articles of this Issue 10/2012

Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine