Top

International Breastfeeding Journal

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Review

Interventions to promote exclusive breastfeeding among young mothers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Christa Buckland, Debra Hector, Gregory S. Kolt, Paul Fahey, Amit Arora

Published in: International Breastfeeding Journal | Issue 1/2020

Abstract

Background

Exclusive breastfeeding rates in many high-income countries are considerably lower than the World Health Organization recommendations. Younger mothers are less likely than older mothers to exclusively breastfeed or to exclusively breastfeed for a long duration. This systematic review explores interventions to increase the rate of exclusive breastfeeding among young mothers in high-income countries.

Methods

A systematic search of the following databases was completed in August 2020: CINAHL, PubMed, MEDLINE, ProQuest, PsychInfo, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus and Embase. A manual search of the reference lists of all the included studies and published systematic reviews was also performed. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. A random effects model meta-analyses was applied. Heterogeneity of outcomes between the studies was assessed using both the χ² test and the I² statistic.

Results

Of 955 records identified in the search, 392 duplicates were removed, and nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies were randomised controlled trial (RCTs) and two were quasi-experimental in design. Eight were conducted in the United States. The interventions included peer counselling, telephone support, massage, gift packs, financial incentive and antenatal education. Most studies included a combination of strategies, peer counselling being the most common. A meta-analysis of four of nine included studies did not detect a difference in rate of exclusive breastfeeding to 3 months postpartum (RR 1.44; 95% CI 0.82, 2.55; p = 0.204).

This review is limited by the relatively few studies which met the inclusion criteria and the small sample sizes of most included studies. High rates of attrition and formula supplementation among the participants made it difficult to detect a statistically significant effect. Consistency in follow up times would enable more studies to be included in a meta-analysis.

Conclusions

Peer counselling was the most promising strategy associated with higher rates of exclusive breastfeeding. However, further studies are needed to understand the breastfeeding experiences of young mothers. Young mothers should be targeted specifically in intervention studies.

Available only for authorised users

World Health Organization. Breastfeeding advocacy initiative: For the best start in life, 2015. Available at http://www.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/152891/http://apps.who.int//iris/bitstream/10665/152891/1/WHO_NMH_NHD_15.1_eng.pdf.

World Health Organization. (2008). Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43895/1/9789241596664_eng.pdf.

World Health Organization. Global strategy on infant and young child feeding, 2002. Available at http://apps.who.int/gb/archive/pdf_files/WHA55/ea5515.pdf?ua=1.

Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, Franca GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21^st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387:475–90.PubMedCrossRef

Kramer MS, Kakuma R. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2012(8):CD003517.PubMedCentral

Young J, Watson EL, Raven L. Responding to evidence: breastfeed baby if you can – the sixth public health recommendation to reduce the risk of sudden and unexpected death in infancy. Breastfeed Rev. 2012;20(1):7–16.PubMed

Heikkilä K, Kelly Y, Renfrew MJ, Sacker A, Quigley MA. Breastfeeding and educational achievement at age 5. Matern Child Nutr. 2014;10:92–101.PubMedCrossRef

American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy statement: breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012;129(3):e827–41.CrossRef

Bartick M, Reinhold A. The burden of suboptimal breastfeeding in the United States: a pediatric cost analysis. Pediatrics. 2010;125(5):e1048–56.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Smith JP, Thompson JF, Ellwood DA. Hospital system costs of artificial infant feeding: estimates for the Australian Capital Territory. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2002;26(2):543–51.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Chowdhury R, Sinha B, Sankar MJ, Taneja S, Bhandari N, Rollins N, et al. Breastfeeding and maternal health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104(467):96–113.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

12.

Khan J, Vesel L, Bahl R, Martines JC. Timing of breastfeeding initiation and exclusivity of breastfeeding during the first month of life: effects on neonatal mortality and morbidity—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19:468–79.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Smith JP, Harvey PJ. Chronic disease and infant nutrition: is it significant to public health? Public Health Nutr. 2010;14(2):279–89.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Scott J, Binns C, Oddy W, Graham KI. Predictors of breastfeeding duration. Evidence from a cohort study. Paediatrics. 2006;117(4):e646–55.CrossRef

15.

World Health Organization. Global Breastfeeding Scorecard, 2017 tracking progress for breastfeeding policies and programmes, 2017. Available at https://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/global-bf-scorecard-2017.pdf.

16.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breastfeeding report card: United States 2018. 2018. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/reportcard.htm.

17.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2010 Australian National Infant Feeding Survey: Indicator results. (Cat no. PHE 156), 2011. Available at http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=10737420925.

18.

World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory data repository: Exclusive breastfeeding under 6 months Data by country, 2017. Available at http://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.NUT1730.

19.

Jones JR, Kogan MD, Singh GK, Dee DL, Grummer-Strawn LM. Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding in the United States. Pediatrics. 2011;128(6):1117–25 https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/128/6/1117.long.PubMedCrossRef

20.

NHS Digital. Infant Feeding Survey – UK. 2010; Retrieved from https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/infant-feeding-survey/infant-feeding-survey-uk-2010.

21.

Balogun OO, O’Sullivan EJ, McFadden A, Ota E, Gavine A, Garner CD, et al. Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD001688.PubMed

22.

Bevan G, Brown M. Interventions in exclusive breastfeeding: a systematic review. Br J Nurs. 2014;23(2):86–9.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Elliott-Rudder M, Pilotto L, McIntyre E, Ramanathan S. Motivational interviewing improves exclusive breastfeeding in an Australian randomised controlled trial. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103:e11–6.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Lumbiganon P, Martis R, Laopaiboon M, Festin MR, Ho JJ, Hakimi M. Antenatal breastfeeding education for increasing breastfeeding duration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12(12):CD006425.PubMed

25.

Olaiya O, Dee D, Sharma A, Smith R. Maternity care practices and breastfeeding among adolescent mothers aged 12-19 years--United States, 2009-2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(2):17–22.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Scott S, Pritchard C, Szatkowski L. The impact of breastfeeding peer support for mothers aged under 25: a time series analysis. Matern Child Nutr. 2017;13(1):e12241.CrossRef

27.

World Health Organization, UNICEF. Baby-friendly hospital initiative: Revised, updated and expanded for integrated care. 2009. Available at http://www.who.int/entity/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/bfhi_trainingcourse/en/index.html.

28.

Mellin PS, Poplawski DT, Defreest N, Massler K, Gole A. Does skin-to-skin contact at birth really make a difference in exclusive breastfeeding rates at discharge? J Obstetr Gynecologic Neonatal Nurs. 2012;41(s1):S141–2.CrossRef

29.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity. Data, Trend and Maps [online]. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpao/data-trends-maps/index.html. Accessed 23 Nov 2020.

30.

Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

31.

Buckland C, Kolt G, Hector D, Arora A. Interventions for increasing exclusive breastfeeding among young mothers in high-income countries: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018083989 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018083989. Accessed 23 Nov 2020.

32.

Costantino G, Montano N, Casazza G. When should we change our clinical practice based on the results of a clinical study? Searching for evidence: PICOS and PubMed. Intern Emerg Med. 2015;10(4):525–7.PubMedCrossRef

33.

World Bank. World Bank Country and Lending Groups: High-income economies ($12,056 or more). 2018. Available at https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519 on 15 August 2018.

34.

Clarivate Analytics. Endnote X8. 2016. Available at https://endnote.com/.

35.

Arlotti J, Cottrell B, Lee S, Curtin J. Breastfeeding among low-income women with and without peer support. J Community Health Nurs. 1998;15(3):163–78.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Bunik M, Shobe P, O'Connor ME, Beaty B, Langendoerfer S, Krane L, et al. Are 2 weeks of daily breastfeeding support insufficient to overcome the influences of formula? Acad Pediatr. 2010;10:21–8.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Chapman DJ, Morel KL, Bermúdez-Millán A, Young SM, Damio G, Pérez-Escamilla R. Breastfeeding education and support trial for overweight and obese women: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2013;131(1):e162–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

38.

Di Meglio G, Mcdermott MP, Klein JD. A randomized controlled trial of telephone peer support's influence on breastfeeding duration in adolescent mothers. Breastfeed Med. 2010;5(1):41–7.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Pugh LC, Milligan RA, Frick KD, Spatz D, Bronner Y. Breastfeeding duration, costs, and benefits of a support program for low-income breastfeeding women. Birth. 2002;29(2):95–100.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Serrano MS, Doren FA, Wilson L. Teaching Chilean mothers to massage their full-term infants: effects on maternal breast-feeding and infant weight gain at age 2 and 4 months. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2010;24(2):172–81.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Snell BJ, Krantz M, Keeton R, Delgado K, Peckham C. The association of formula samples given at hospital discharge with the early duration of breastfeeding. J Hum Lact. 1992;8(2):67–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/089033449200800213.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Wambach KA, Aaronson L, Breedlove G, Williams Domian E, Rojjanasrirat W, Yeh HW. A randomized controlled trial of breastfeeding support and education for adolescent mothers. West J Nurs Res. 2011;33(4):486–505.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Washio Y, Humphreys M, Colchado E, Sierra-Ortiz M, Zhang A, Collins BN, et al. Incentive-based intervention to maintain breastfeeding among low-income Puerto Rican mothers. Pediatrics. 2017;139(3):e20163119.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

44.

Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC, (editors). Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions vVersion 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org.

45.

Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG. Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, (editors) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Chichester: The Cochrane Collaboration and John Wiley and Sons Ltd. 2008(2011):243–296.CrossRef

46.

Borenstein M. Wiley InterScience. Chapter 10, in Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley; 2009.

47.

Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. Br Med J. 2011;343:d4002.CrossRef

48.

R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna; 2013. http://www.R-project.org/.

49.

Shakya P, Kunieda MK, Koyama M, Rai SS, Miyaguchi M, Dhakal S, et al. Effectiveness of community-based peer support for mothers to improve their breastfeeding practices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177434.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

50.

Jolly K, Ingram L, Khan KS, Deeks JJ, Freemantle N, MacArthur C. Systematic review of peer support for breastfeeding continuation: Meta-regression analysis of the effect of setting, intensity, and timing. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.). 2012;344:d8287.CrossRef

51.

Skouteris H, Bailey C, Nagle C, Hauck Y, Bruce L, Morris H. Interventions designed to promote exclusive breastfeeding in high-income countries: a systematic review update. Breastfeed Med. 2017;12(10):64–614.CrossRef

52.

Haroon S, Das JK, Salam RA, Imdad A, Bhutta ZA. Breastfeeding promotion interventions and breastfeeding practices: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(Suppl 3):S20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

53.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Barriers to breastfeeding in the United States. Washington, D.C.: In The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding; 2011. Available at http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/calls/breastfeeding/calltoactiontosupportbreastfeeding.pdf.

Title: Interventions to promote exclusive breastfeeding among young mothers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Christa Buckland
Debra Hector
Gregory S. Kolt
Paul Fahey
Amit Arora
Publication date: 01-12-2020
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: International Breastfeeding Journal / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1746-4358
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-020-00340-6

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Interventions to promote exclusive breastfeeding among young mothers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

“If I have money, I cannot allow my baby to breastfeed only …” barriers and facilitators to scale-up of peer counselling for exclusive breastfeeding in Uganda

The relationship between perceived milk supply and exclusive breastfeeding during the first six months postpartum: a cross-sectional study

Exploring the challenges and opportunities towards optimal breastfeeding in Ethiopia: a formative qualitative study

Trends and factors associated to early initiation of breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding and duration of breastfeeding in Ethiopia: evidence from the Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016

Effectiveness of biological nurturing on early breastfeeding problems: a randomized controlled trial

Understanding breastfeeding behaviours: a cross-sectional analysis of associated factors in Ireland, the United Kingdom and Australia