Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2006

Open Access 01-12-2006 | Research article

Interval estimation and optimal design for the within-subject coefficient of variation for continuous and binary variables

Authors: Mohamed M Shoukri, Nasser Elkum, Stephen D Walter

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In this paper we propose the use of the within-subject coefficient of variation as an index of a measurement's reliability. For continuous variables and based on its maximum likelihood estimation we derive a variance-stabilizing transformation and discuss confidence interval construction within the framework of a one-way random effects model. We investigate sample size requirements for the within-subject coefficient of variation for continuous and binary variables.

Methods

We investigate the validity of the approximate normal confidence interval by Monte Carlo simulations. In designing a reliability study, a crucial issue is the balance between the number of subjects to be recruited and the number of repeated measurements per subject. We discuss efficiency of estimation and cost considerations for the optimal allocation of the sample resources. The approach is illustrated by an example on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). We also discuss the issue of sample size estimation for dichotomous responses with two examples.

Results

For the continuous variable we found that the variance stabilizing transformation improves the asymptotic coverage probabilities on the within-subject coefficient of variation for the continuous variable. The maximum like estimation and sample size estimation based on pre-specified width of confidence interval are novel contribution to the literature for the binary variable.

Conclusion

Using the sample size formulas, we hope to help clinical epidemiologists and practicing statisticians to efficiently design reliability studies using the within-subject coefficient of variation, whether the variable of interest is continuous or binary.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ashton E, Takahashi C, Berg M, Goodman A, Totterman S, Ekholm S: Accuracy and reproducibility of manual and semi-automated quantification of MS lesions in MRI. 2003, Technical Report, Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY Ashton E, Takahashi C, Berg M, Goodman A, Totterman S, Ekholm S: Accuracy and reproducibility of manual and semi-automated quantification of MS lesions in MRI. 2003, Technical Report, Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
2.
go back to reference Schwartz L, Ginsberg M, DeCorato D: Evaluation of Tumor Measurements in oncology: Use of film-based and electronic techniques. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2000, 18 (10): 2179-2184.PubMed Schwartz L, Ginsberg M, DeCorato D: Evaluation of Tumor Measurements in oncology: Use of film-based and electronic techniques. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2000, 18 (10): 2179-2184.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Tian L: Inference on the common coefficient of variation. Statistics in Medicine. 2005, 24: 2213-2220. 10.1002/sim.2088.CrossRefPubMed Tian L: Inference on the common coefficient of variation. Statistics in Medicine. 2005, 24: 2213-2220. 10.1002/sim.2088.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Fleiss J: Design and analysis of clinical experiments. 1986, Wiley & Sons, New York Fleiss J: Design and analysis of clinical experiments. 1986, Wiley & Sons, New York
5.
go back to reference Dunn G: Design and analysis of reliability Studies. 1989, Oxford University Press, New York Dunn G: Design and analysis of reliability Studies. 1989, Oxford University Press, New York
6.
go back to reference Shoukri MM: Measures of inter-observer agreement. 2004, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press. Boca Raton, Florida Shoukri MM: Measures of inter-observer agreement. 2004, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press. Boca Raton, Florida
7.
go back to reference Quan H, Shih WJ: Assessing reproducibility by the within-subject coefficient of variation with random effects models. Biometrics. 1996, 52: 1195-1203.CrossRefPubMed Quan H, Shih WJ: Assessing reproducibility by the within-subject coefficient of variation with random effects models. Biometrics. 1996, 52: 1195-1203.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Donner A, Eliasziw M: Sample size requirements for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine. 1987, 6: 441-448.CrossRefPubMed Donner A, Eliasziw M: Sample size requirements for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine. 1987, 6: 441-448.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Walter D, Eliasziw M, Donner A: Sample size and optimal design for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine. 1998, 17: 101-110. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::AID-SIM727>3.0.CO;2-E.CrossRefPubMed Walter D, Eliasziw M, Donner A: Sample size and optimal design for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine. 1998, 17: 101-110. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::AID-SIM727>3.0.CO;2-E.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bonett DG: Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Statistics in Medicine. 2002, 21: 1331-1335. 10.1002/sim.1108.CrossRefPubMed Bonett DG: Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Statistics in Medicine. 2002, 21: 1331-1335. 10.1002/sim.1108.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Shoukri M, Asyali M, Walter S: Issues of cost and efficiency in the design of reliability studies. Biometrics. 2003, 59: 1107-1112. 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2003.00127.x.CrossRefPubMed Shoukri M, Asyali M, Walter S: Issues of cost and efficiency in the design of reliability studies. Biometrics. 2003, 59: 1107-1112. 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2003.00127.x.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Flynn N, Whitely E, Peters T: Recruitment strategy in a cluster randomized trial: Cost implications. Statistics in Medicine. 2002, 21: 397-405. 10.1002/sim.1025.CrossRefPubMed Flynn N, Whitely E, Peters T: Recruitment strategy in a cluster randomized trial: Cost implications. Statistics in Medicine. 2002, 21: 397-405. 10.1002/sim.1025.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kendall M, Stuart A: The advanced theory of statistics. 1986, London: Griffin, I: Kendall M, Stuart A: The advanced theory of statistics. 1986, London: Griffin, I:
14.
go back to reference Sukhatme P, Sukhatme B, Sukhatme S, Asok C: Sampling theory of surveys with applications. 1984, Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press Sukhatme P, Sukhatme B, Sukhatme S, Asok C: Sampling theory of surveys with applications. 1984, Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press
15.
go back to reference Mak TK: Analyzing the intra-class correlation for dichotomous variables. Applied Statistics. 1988, 37: 344-352.CrossRef Mak TK: Analyzing the intra-class correlation for dichotomous variables. Applied Statistics. 1988, 37: 344-352.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bloch DA, Kraemer HC: 2 × 2 kappa coefficients: measures of agreement or association. Biometrics. 1989, 45: 269-287.CrossRefPubMed Bloch DA, Kraemer HC: 2 × 2 kappa coefficients: measures of agreement or association. Biometrics. 1989, 45: 269-287.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Powell KA, Obouchowski NA, Chilote WA, Barry MM, Ganocik SN, Cardenso G: File-screen versus digitized mammography: assessment of clinical equivalence. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1999, 173: 889-894.CrossRefPubMed Powell KA, Obouchowski NA, Chilote WA, Barry MM, Ganocik SN, Cardenso G: File-screen versus digitized mammography: assessment of clinical equivalence. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1999, 173: 889-894.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Donner A, Eliasziw M: A goodness-of-fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: confidence interval construction, significance testing and sample size estimation. Statistics in Medicine. 1992, 11: 1551-1519.CrossRef Donner A, Eliasziw M: A goodness-of-fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: confidence interval construction, significance testing and sample size estimation. Statistics in Medicine. 1992, 11: 1551-1519.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gardner M, Altman D: Confidence intervals rather than P-values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. British Medical Journal. 1986, 292: 746-750.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gardner M, Altman D: Confidence intervals rather than P-values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. British Medical Journal. 1986, 292: 746-750.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Goodman S, Berlin J: The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1994, 121: 200-206.CrossRefPubMed Goodman S, Berlin J: The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1994, 121: 200-206.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Interval estimation and optimal design for the within-subject coefficient of variation for continuous and binary variables
Authors
Mohamed M Shoukri
Nasser Elkum
Stephen D Walter
Publication date
01-12-2006
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2006
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-24

Other articles of this Issue 1/2006

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2006 Go to the issue