Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Correspondence

Interpretation of within-group change in randomised trials

Author: Kypros Kypri

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2020

Abstract

In medicine, it is common to observe improvement after intervention, at least partly because patients present for care in extremis and would have improved without intervention. Controlling for this counterfactual explanation for improvement is the principle reason to conduct a trial in which patients are randomised to treatment or a control group. Accordingly, it is not reasonable to infer that both interventions are effective when the groups show similar improvements in outcome.

Säfsten E, Forsell Y, Ramstedt M, Damström Thakker K, Galanti MR. A pragmatic randomised trial of two counselling models at the Swedish national alcohol helpline. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):213.CrossRef

GBD 2016 Alcohol Collaborators. Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2018;392(10152):1015–35.CrossRef

Säfsten E, Forsell Y, Ramstedt M, Galanti MR. Comparing counselling models for the hazardous use of alcohol at the Swedish National Alcohol Helpline: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2017;18(1):257.CrossRef

Barnett AG, van der Pols JC, Dobson AJ. Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34(1):215–20.CrossRef

Kypri K. Methodological issues in alcohol screening and brief intervention research. Subst Abus. 2007;28(3):31–42.CrossRef

Hofler M. Causal inference based on counterfactuals. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:28.CrossRef

Chalmers D. Otitis media with effusion in children: the Dunedin Study. Oxford: MacKeith Press; 1989. p. xii. 167.

American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Management of Acute Otitis M. Diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Pediatrics. 2004;113(5):1451–65.CrossRef

McCambridge J, Kypri K, McElduff P. Regression to the mean and alcohol consumption: a cohort study exploring implications for the interpretation of change in control groups in brief intervention trials. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;135:156–9.CrossRef

10.

Friedman LM, Furberg C, DeMets DL. Fundamentals of clinical trials. New York: Springer; 2010.CrossRef

11.

Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(3):141–5.CrossRef

Title: Interpretation of within-group change in randomised trials
Author: Kypros Kypri
Publication date: 01-12-2020
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02641-w

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Interpretation of within-group change in randomised trials

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Cost-effectiveness of guideline-based stepped and collaborative care versus treatment as usual for patients with depression – a cluster-randomized trial

Correction to: Dimensions of leisure-time physical activity and risk of depression in the “Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra” (SUN) prospective cohort

Animal-assisted therapy on happiness and life quality of chronic psychiatric patients living in psychiatric residential care homes: a randomized controlled study

Demographic and clinical characteristics of foreign nationals accessing psychiatric services in Japan: a multicentre study in a metropolitan area

Correction to: Relationship between Toxoplasma gondii seropositivity and schizophrenia in the Lebanese population: potential implication of genetic polymorphism of MMP-9

Cues for different diagnostic patterns of interpersonal violence in a psychiatric sample: an observational study