Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2017

Open Access 01-08-2017 | Original Article

Interest of an auto-adjustable nighttime compression sleeve (MOBIDERM® Autofit) in maintenance phase of upper limb lymphedema: the MARILYN pilot RCT

Authors: S. Mestre, C. Calais, G. Gaillard, M. Nou, M. Pasqualini, C. Ben Amor, I. Quere

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a debilitating condition. The recommended treatment is based on decongestive lymphedema therapy (DLT) with two separate phases: a short-term intensive phase to reduce lymphedema volume and a long-term maintenance phase to stabilize it. Optimizing compression therapy and compliance during maintenance phase are key factors for long-term control of lymphedema. The primary objective of this pilot prospective open-label randomized study was to assess the benefit of a new auto-adjustable nighttime arm sleeve (MOBIDERM® Autofit) on lymphedema volume during the maintenance phase after the intensive phase.

Methods

Forty women with BRCL were consecutively enrolled and randomized (D0) for 1 month in 1:1 ratio either in night-use group: with MOBIDERM® Autofit (on top of a daytime compression hosiery), or in no night-use group: without MOBIDERM® Autofit (daytime hosiery alone). From Day 31 to Day 90, all patients were fitted with MOBIDERM® Autofit. Primary endpoint was lymphedema volume variation between Day 0 and Day 30. Secondary endpoints were compliance, quality of life (LYMQOL arm questionnaire), functional symptoms (heaviness, limb use limitation, pain), sleep quality, and safety.

Results

In ITT population, between Day 0 and Day 30, mean lymphedema volume increase was higher in no night-use group with 92.9 mL (i.e., 3.2%) than in night-use group with 46.7 mL (i.e., 1.80%), p = 0.757. Between Day 30 and Day 90, all patients fitted with MOBIDERM® Autofit, lymphedema volume remained stable in both groups. The device improved functional symptoms and function domain of the LYMQOL arm questionnaire. MOBIDERM® Autofit was worn overnight almost 85% of the nights. It was well accepted by the patients and no adverse reaction leading to permanent device discontinuation occurred.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that MOBIDERM® Autofit offers clinical benefits during maintenance phase of lymphedema treatment and enhances patient’s self-management.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Petrek JA, Heelan MC (1998) Incidence of breast carcinoma-related lymphedema. Cancer 83:2776–1781CrossRefPubMed Petrek JA, Heelan MC (1998) Incidence of breast carcinoma-related lymphedema. Cancer 83:2776–1781CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Meric F, Buchholz TA, Mirza NQ, Vlastos G, Ames FC, Ross MI et al (2002) Long-term complications associated with breast-conservation surgery and radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 9(6):543–549CrossRefPubMed Meric F, Buchholz TA, Mirza NQ, Vlastos G, Ames FC, Ross MI et al (2002) Long-term complications associated with breast-conservation surgery and radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 9(6):543–549CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Clark B, Sitzia J, Harlow W (2005) Incidence and risk of arm oedema following treatment for breast cancer: a three-year follow-up study. QJM 98(5):343–348CrossRefPubMed Clark B, Sitzia J, Harlow W (2005) Incidence and risk of arm oedema following treatment for breast cancer: a three-year follow-up study. QJM 98(5):343–348CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Campbell KL, Pusic AL, Zucker DS, McNeely ML, Binkley JM, Cheville AL, Harwood KJ (2012) A prospective model of care for breast cancer rehabilitation: function. Cancer 118(8 Suppl):2300–2311CrossRefPubMed Campbell KL, Pusic AL, Zucker DS, McNeely ML, Binkley JM, Cheville AL, Harwood KJ (2012) A prospective model of care for breast cancer rehabilitation: function. Cancer 118(8 Suppl):2300–2311CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Paskett ED, Dean JA, Oliveri JM, Harrop JP (2012) Cancer-related lymphedema risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and impact: a review. J Clin Oncol 30(30):3726–3733CrossRefPubMed Paskett ED, Dean JA, Oliveri JM, Harrop JP (2012) Cancer-related lymphedema risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and impact: a review. J Clin Oncol 30(30):3726–3733CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cheville AL, McGarvey CL, Petrek JA, Russo SA, Taylor ME, Thiadens SR (2003) Lymphedema management. Semin Radiat Oncol 13(3):290–301CrossRefPubMed Cheville AL, McGarvey CL, Petrek JA, Russo SA, Taylor ME, Thiadens SR (2003) Lymphedema management. Semin Radiat Oncol 13(3):290–301CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Vignes S, Porcher R, Arrault M, Dupuy A (2011) Factors influencing breast cancer-related lymphedema volume after intensive decongestive physiotherapy. Support Care Cancer 19(7):935–940CrossRefPubMed Vignes S, Porcher R, Arrault M, Dupuy A (2011) Factors influencing breast cancer-related lymphedema volume after intensive decongestive physiotherapy. Support Care Cancer 19(7):935–940CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Quéré I, Presles E, Coupe M, Vignes S, Vaillant L, Eveno D et al (2014) Prospective multicentre observational study of lymphedema therapy: POLIT study. J Mal Vasc 39(4):256–263CrossRefPubMed Quéré I, Presles E, Coupe M, Vignes S, Vaillant L, Eveno D et al (2014) Prospective multicentre observational study of lymphedema therapy: POLIT study. J Mal Vasc 39(4):256–263CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference The International Lymphoedema Framework. Best Practice for the management of lymphoedema - Second edition, 2012. The International Lymphoedema Framework. Best Practice for the management of lymphoedema - Second edition, 2012.
12.
go back to reference Damstra RJ, Partsch H (2009) Compression therapy in breast cancer-related lymphedema: A randomized, controlled comparative study of relation between volume and interface pressure changes. J Vasc Surg 49(5):1256–1263CrossRefPubMed Damstra RJ, Partsch H (2009) Compression therapy in breast cancer-related lymphedema: A randomized, controlled comparative study of relation between volume and interface pressure changes. J Vasc Surg 49(5):1256–1263CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Megens AM, Harris SR, Kim-Sing C, McKenzie DC (2001) Measurementof upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissectionfor breast cancer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:1639–1644CrossRefPubMed Megens AM, Harris SR, Kim-Sing C, McKenzie DC (2001) Measurementof upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissectionfor breast cancer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:1639–1644CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Galland C, Auvert JF, Flahault A, Vayssairat M (2002) Why and how post-mastectomy edema should be quantified in patients withbreast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 75:87–89CrossRefPubMed Galland C, Auvert JF, Flahault A, Vayssairat M (2002) Why and how post-mastectomy edema should be quantified in patients withbreast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 75:87–89CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Keeley V, Crooks S, Locke J, Veigas D, Riches K, Hilliam R (2010) A quality of life measure for limb lymphoedema (LYMQOL). Journal of Lymphoedema 5(1):26–37 Keeley V, Crooks S, Locke J, Veigas D, Riches K, Hilliam R (2010) A quality of life measure for limb lymphoedema (LYMQOL). Journal of Lymphoedema 5(1):26–37
17.
go back to reference Boris M, Weindorf S, Lasinkski S (1997) Persistence of lymphedema reduction after noninvasive complex lymphedema therapy. Oncology (Williston Park) 11(1):99–109 discussion 10, 13-4 Boris M, Weindorf S, Lasinkski S (1997) Persistence of lymphedema reduction after noninvasive complex lymphedema therapy. Oncology (Williston Park) 11(1):99–109 discussion 10, 13-4
Metadata
Title
Interest of an auto-adjustable nighttime compression sleeve (MOBIDERM® Autofit) in maintenance phase of upper limb lymphedema: the MARILYN pilot RCT
Authors
S. Mestre
C. Calais
G. Gaillard
M. Nou
M. Pasqualini
C. Ben Amor
I. Quere
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3652-5

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine